Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(9):2397–2409. doi: 10.1177/03635465221104470

Table 3.

Baseline (pre rACLR) Patient-Reported Outcome Scores

Median (25%, 75% quartile) Baseline Patient Reported Outcome Scores Overall (n=1234) No Bone Grafting (n=1075) 1-Stage Bone Grafting (n=64) 2-Stage Bone Grafting (n=95) P value

IKDC 52 (38, 63) 52 (39, 64) 51 (39, 60) 48 (34, 59) 0.22
KOOS
 • Symptoms 68 (54, 82) 68 (54, 82) 71 (50, 82) 68 (54, 82) 0.95
 • Pain 75 (58, 86) 75 (58, 86) 75 (60, 86) 72 (61, 86) 0.87
 • Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 87 (69, 96) 87 (69, 96) 86 (66, 96) 85 (63, 94) 0.66
 • Sports/recreation 45 (25, 65) 45 (25, 65) 40 (15, 65) 40 (20, 59) 0.21
 • Quality of life (QOL) 31 (19, 44) 31 (19, 44) 31 (13, 45) 25 (13, 38) 0.001 1
WOMAC
 • Stiffness 75 (50, 88) 75 (50, 88) 75 (59, 88) 75 (50, 88) 0.43
 • Pain 85 (70, 95) 85 (70, 95) 80 (65, 95) 80 (65, 94) 0.48
 • Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 87 (69, 96) 87 (69, 96) 86 (66, 96) 85 (63, 94) 0.64
Marx Activity Level 11 (4, 16) 12 (4, 16) 7 (3, 15) 6 (0, 12) <0.001 2

Key:

1:

ANOVA tests showed a significant difference in this variable between groups (p=0.001). Tukey HSD multiple comparison test showed that the 2-staged bone grafting group was significantly lower than the no bone grafting group (p=0.001). The 2-staged bone grafting group was not significantly lower than the 1-stage bone grafting group (p=0.20).

2:

ANOVA tests showed a significant difference in this variable between groups (p<0.001). Tukey HSD multiple comparison test showed that the 2-staged bone grafting group was significantly lower than the no bone grafting group (p<0.001). The 1-stage bone grafting group was not significantly different than the 2-staged bone grafting group (p=0.29) or the no bone grafting group (p=0.07).