Table 2.

Quality assessment of included studies

A. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series for included retrospective single-arm studies
Study	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Q6	Q7	Q8	Q9	Q10	Overall appraisal
Castro 2022 [21]	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Teng 2022 [22]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Include
Komatsu 2022 [23]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Kuzuya 2022 [24]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Cheon 2022 [25]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Himmelsbach 2022 [26]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Maesaka 2022 [27]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Iwamoto 2021 [28]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Tomonari 2022 [29]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Sho 2022 [30]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Chon 2022 [31]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
D’Alessio 2022 [32]	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Eso 2021 [33]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Chen 2022 [34]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Fulgenzi 2022 [35]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Include
Tada 2022 [36]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Chuma 2022 [37]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Unclear	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Wang 2022 [38]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
Tanaka 2022 [39]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Include
B. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the other suitable studies
Study		Selection			Comparability			Outcome			Quality score
Kim 2022 [40]		4			2			2			8
Hiraoka 2022 [41]		4			2			2			8
Cheng 2022 [42]		4			2			3			9
Lee 2020 [17]		4			2			3			9