Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 6;23:499. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04481-0

Table 1.

Questionnaire Results

2019–2020 2020–2021 2021–2022
Response 23.3% Response 31.1% Response 36.0%
N M SD N M SD N M SD
Intervision helped me to… [1-5] (1—5) (1—5)
1. gain insight in how I am doing in my clerkshipsa 92 3.7 0.9 123 3.6 0.9 x x x
2. gain insight in how I handle difficult situations during the clerkshipsa 92 4.0 0.8 123 4.1 0.7 x x x
a. gain self-insightb x x x x x x 142 3.8 0.9
3. better deal with difficult situations during the clerkships 92 3.9 0.8 123 3.9 0.8 142 3.9 0.8
4. put things that happen in the clinical workplace into perspective 92 4.1 0.8 123 3.9 0.8 142 4.0 0.8
5. better regulate any emotions that I experience in the clinical workplace 91 3.7 0.9 123 3.6 0.8 142 3.6 0.9
6. Intervision stimulated to actively work with the insights I gained during intervision 92 3.6 0.8 123 3.6 0.9 141 3.6 0.7
7. I find the sharing of experiences with fellow students during intervision to be valuable 92 4.1 0.9 122 4.0 0.9 142 4.1 0.8
8. Intervision is a good addition to the clerkships 91 4.0 1.0 122 3.8 1.0 142 3.9 0.9
N M SD N M SD N M SD
(1—10) (1–10) (1—10)
9. Give a grade (1–10) for the quality of the intervision programme 92 7.8 1.3 123 7.2 1.6 142 7.5 1.3

1:fully disagree, 2: disagree, 3: neutral, 4: agree, 5: fully agree

1 = lowest, 10 = highest (lower than 6 is considered insufficient)

apart of the 2019–2020 & 2020–2021 questionnaire, replaced by questions 'a' in the 2021–2022

bpart of the 2021–2022 questionnaire