Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurooncol. 2014 Jul 22;120(1):163–169. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1539-6

Table 2.

Hazard ratios for hazard of developing leptomeningeal dissemination

Univariate analysis

Clinical feature Univariate hazard ratio (95 % CI) p value
Age (5-year interval) 0.9 (0.8, 1.0)   0.006
Female Sex – (male, referent) 1.4 (0.8, 2.5)   0.24
Primary site of cancera
   Breast 1.5 (0.8, 2.8)   0.16
   Lung 0.6 (0.3, 1.0)   0.07
   Melanoma 1.3 (0.6, 2.9)   0.47
   Colon/rectal 2.9 (1.2, 6.7)   0.01
   Genitourinary
   Otherb 1.4 (0.4, 4.9)   0.57
Number of metastases 1.1 (1.0, 1.3)   0.005
Distant Failure 4.1 (2.1, 7.9) <0.0001
Surgical resection before SRS 1.1 (0.6, 2.0)   0.78
Surgical resection after SRS
Whole brain radiation therapy 2.4 (1.4, 4.4)   0.003
Stepwise multivariable model

Clinical feature Adjusted hazard ratio(95 % CI) p value

Colorectal primary sitea 4.5 (2.5, 8.0) <0.0001
Number of metastases 1.1 (1.0, 1.2)   0.0091
Distant failure 2.0 (1.2,3.2)   0.0065
Age (5-year interval) 0.9 (0.8, 0.9)   0.0006
Breast cancer primary sitea 1.6 (1.0, 2.7)   0.05

CI confidence interval, SRS stereotactic radiosurgery

a

Each primary site was compared against all other sites combined

b

Includes “other and unknown”, gynecologic, and esophagus

No leptomeningeal dissemination observed