Table 2.

Correlation between different workflows in relation to the dental measurements (n = 18)

	IOS vs. Scan		IOS vs. CBCT		Scan vs. CBCT
	r	p	r	p	r	p
Maxillary
R6	0.955	< 0.001*	0.921	< 0.001*	0.949	< 0.001*
R5	0.928	< 0.001*	0.873	< 0.001*	0.878	< 0.001*
R4	0.825	< 0.001*	0.867	< 0.001*	0.766	< 0.001*
R3	0.908	< 0.001*	0.712	0.001*	0.655	0.003*
R2	0.907	< 0.001*	0.899	< 0.001*	0.851	< 0.001*
R1	0.952	< 0.001*	0.917	< 0.001*	0.902	< 0.001*
L1	0.976	< 0.001*	0.984	< 0.001*	0.970	< 0.001*
L2	0.798	< 0.001*	0.875	< 0.001*	0.902	< 0.001*
L3	0.916	< 0.001*	0.616	0.007*	0.671	0.002*
L4	0.943	< 0.001*	0.794	< 0.001*	0.797	< 0.001*
L5	0.939	< 0.001*	0.872	< 0.001*	0.853	< 0.001*
L6	0.951	< 0.001*	0.907	< 0.001*	0.832	< 0.001*
Mandibular
R6	0.864	< 0.001*	0.971	< 0.001*	0.876	< 0.001*
R5	0.982	< 0.001*	0.966	< 0.001*	0.972	< 0.001*
R4	0.710	0.001*	0.760	< 0.001*	0.561	0.015*
R3	0.957	< 0.001*	0.697	0.001*	0.692	0.001*
R2	0.630	0.005*	0.768	< 0.001*	0.620	0.006*
R1	0.499	0.035*	0.626	0.005*	0.462	0.054
L1	0.865	< 0.001*	0.841	< 0.001*	0.607	0.008*
L2	0.726	0.001*	0.800	< 0.001*	0.750	< 0.001*
L3	0.824	< 0.001*	0.797	< 0.001*	0.836	< 0.001*
L4	0.863	< 0.001*	0.818	< 0.001*	0.937	< 0.001*
L5	0.986	< 0.001*	0.988	< 0.001*	0.987	< 0.001*
L6	0.948	< 0.001*	0.931	< 0.001*	0.916	< 0.001*

r Pearson coefficient

^*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05