Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2023 Mar 20;118(8):1527–1539. doi: 10.1111/add.16178

Table 3:

Adjusted opioid overdose mortality incident rate ratios during time prescribed methadone or buprenorphine, relative to time out of OAT, and during time prescribed buprenorphine relative to time prescribed methadone, by age group

Treatment PY N opioid overdose deaths Crude mortality rate per 1,000 PY (95% CI) GEE
Adjusted IRR (95% CI)
MSM
Adjusted IRR (95% CI)
Age group Comparison of each treatment to time out of OAT Comparison of buprenorphine to methadone Comparison of each treatment to time out of OAT Comparison of buprenorphine to methadone
Out of OAT 30,027 123 4.1 (3.4–4.9) Ref. Ref.
<30 years Buprenorphine 11,016 9 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.20 (0.09–0.45) 0.58 (0.24–1.38) 0.18 (0.07–0.45) 0.46 (0.17–1.26)
Methadone 25,533 37 1.4 (1.0–2.0) 0.34 (0.22–0.53) Ref. 0.39 (0.24–0.63) Ref.
Out of OAT 45,140 321 7.1 (6.4–7.9) Ref. Ref.
30–39 years Buprenorphine 18,229 23 1.3 (0.8–1.9) 0.18 (0.11–0.29) 0.80 (0.46–1.40) 0.17 (0.10–0.31) 0.61 (0.32–1.18)
Methadone 47,208 77 1.6 (1.3–2.0) 0.22 (0.16–0.30) Ref. 0.28 (0.20–0.39) Ref.
Out of OAT 27,428 210 7.7 (6.7–8.8) Ref. Ref.
40–49 years Buprenorphine 12,901 17 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 0.17 (0.09–0.31) 0.61 (0.32–1.17) 0.20 (0.09–0.44) 0.70 (0.30–1.64)
Methadone 32,794 73 2.2 (1.8–2.8) 0.28 (0.20–0.39) Ref. 0.28 (0.19–0.40) Ref.
Out of OAT 10,800 102 9.4 (7.8–11.5) Ref. Ref.
50+ years Buprenorphine 6,195 11 1.8 (1.0–3.2) 0.18 (0.08–0.39) 0.47 (0.21–1.02) 0.22 (0.08–0.61) 0.49 (0.17–1.41)
Methadone 14,785 56 3.8 (2.9–4.9) 0.39 (0.26–0.58) Ref. 0.45 (0.29–0.69) Ref.

OAT = opioid agonist treatment. PY = person-years. GEE = generalized estimating equation. IRR = incident rate ratio. MSM = marginal structural model. Ref = reference category for IRR. GEE models are adjusted for year, sex, geographical remoteness, indigeneity, socio-economic disadvantage index, recent: incarceration, mental health ambulatory outpatient activity, previous OAT history, hospital admissions for mood and psychosis disorders, substance use and self-harm. MSM models are weight adjusted for treatment selection bias using: year^, sex, geographical remoteness, Indigenous status, socio-economic disadvantage index, recency of: criminal charges^, previous OAT history, most recent OAT^, hospital admissions for respiratory^, substance use^, previous NFOD on OAT, prescriber preference^ and censorship using: year^, sex, geographical remoteness, indigeneity, socio-economic disadvantage index, previous OAT history, treatment^ and treatment by year interaction^ and recency of: incarceration^, hospital admissions for mood^ and psychosis disorders^, substance use^ and mental health ambulatory outpatient activity^. ^=fitted at baseline and time varying.