Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eye Contact Lens. 2023 May 2;49(7):267–274. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000993

TABLE 4.

Bacterial and fungal distribution in microbial keratitis at other academic ophthalmology departments in the United States*

Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, MD Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary Boston, MA27,37 Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA2 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL30,36 St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO20 University of California, San Francisco25 University of Pittsburgh 26 Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles (faculty practice)21 Los Angeles County Hospital-University of Southern California (public hospital)21
Most common bacterial isolate Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (24.8%) Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (45.5%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26%) Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (20%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.6%) Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (41%) Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (30%)
Most common fungal isolate in fungal keratitis Candida spp. (45%) Fusarium spp.10 (41%) Candida spp. (% unavail) Fusarium spp. (62%) Fusarium spp. (35%) --- --- Candida spp. (14%) Candida spp. (29%)
Bacteria vs. fungi 90% vs. 10% --- 85% vs. 15% --- 84% vs. 16% --- --- 91% vs. 9% 89% vs. 11%
Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative in bacterial keratitis 69.5% vs 28.4% 87% vs 13% --- 48% vs 50% 59% vs. 41% 65% vs 35% 56% vs 44% 70% vs 21% 68% vs 21%
Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence in bacterial keratitis 12% 3% 24% 26% 21% 11% 17% 13% 10%
*

For proportions of bacterial keratitis in our study as well as other studies included for comparison, the number of cases of bacterial keratitis, rather than all cases of microbial keratitis, was used as the denominator.