Table 7:
Quality assessment of cross-sectional studies
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citation | 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | 2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | 3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | 4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | 5. Were confounding factors identified? | 6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | 7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | 8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? |
Azevedo 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Bryniarski 2021 | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Buzgova 2014 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Buzgova 2015 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Chan 2014 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Delgado-Guay 2009 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Ganzini 2010 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Grotmol 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Grotmol 2019 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
HeNoch 2007 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Huang 2019 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Irwin 2008 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Janssens 2019 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Masel 2016 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
McMillan 2009 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Smith 2003 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Smitz 2006 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Sudarisan 2019 | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Teunissen 2007 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |