Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2023 Apr 7;278(1):22–30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005878

Table 3.

Changes in physical function outcomes within arms and between arms.

Outcome Arm A Arm B P-value for
difference between
Arm A and Arm B
6-minute walk distance (m), mean ± SD
n 61 64
Baseline 466.5 ± 102.0 478.1 ± 92.7 0.50
Follow-up 484.9 ± 109.6 505.4 ± 113.5 0.31
Δ within group 18.5 ± 56.7 27.3 ± 68.1 0.44
P-value for Δ within group 0.01 0.002
5x sit-to-stand time (s), mean ± SD
n 58 61
Baseline 11.9 ± 3.9 11.2 ± 3.4 0.32
Follow-up 11.0 ± 5.3 9.7 ± 3.4 0.12
Δ within group −0.9 ± 3.3 −1.5 ± 2.2 0.24
P-value for Δ within group 0.05 <0.001
Handgrip strength (kg), mean ± SD
n 61 64
Baseline 32.3 ± 11.0 33.0 ± 11.3 0.72
Follow-up 32.0 ± 10.6 32.9 ± 11.5 0.64
Δ within group −0.3 ± 5.2 −0.1 ± 4.4 0.80
P-value for Δ within group 0.64 0.86
Arm curl test repetitions, mean ± SD
n 60 62
Baseline 20.1 ± 5.2 18.6 ± 4.9 0.11
Follow-up 21.6 ± 6.2 21.4 ± 6.4 0.85
Δ within group 1.5 ± 3.6 2.8 ± 3.8 0.06
P-value for Δ within group 0.002 <0.001
3-meter walk test time (s), mean ± SD
n 59 63
Baseline 2.8 ± .7 2.7 ± .6 0.74
Follow up 2.7 ± .8 2.6 ± .5 0.55
Δ within group −0.1 ± .7 −0.1 ± .5 0.76
P-value for Δ within group 0.20 0.04