Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2023 Feb 20;130(7):756–763. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.018

Table 3.

Summary of GRS results for specific glaucoma phenotypes among POAG cases in the NEIGHBORHOOD consortium.

A. Maximal treated intraocular pressure (in mmHg)
GRS GRS Percentile Mean (SD) Top GRS Percentile Mean (SD) Bottom GRS Percentile p-value Adjusted p-value1
TXNRD2 1% 19.9 (7.1) (n=24) 15.6 (3.9) (n=24) 0.01 0.03
5% 17.1 (5.6) (n=118) 17.0 (4.8) (n=120) 0.93 0.94
10% 17.3 (5.6) (n=241) 17.8 (5.1) (n=235) 0.28 0.84
ME3 1% 19.2 (4.5) (n=24) 17.9 (5.0) (n=24) 0.36 0.43
5% 18.2 (5.4) (n=118) 18.3 (5.9) (n=118) 0.94 0.94
10% 18.4 (5.6) (n=230) 18.1 (5.9) (n=243) 0.70 0.92
TXNRD2 + ME3 1% 18.5 (5.1) (n=23) 16.8 (5.8) (n=26) 0.28 0.42
5% 18.1 (5.6) (n=117) 18.0 (5.5) (n=121) 0.88 0.94
10% 17.8 (5.4) (n=230) 18.0 (5.3) (n=239) 0.77 0.92
B. Paracentral visual field loss
GRS GRS Percentile Prevalence Top GRS Percentile Prevalence Bottom GRS Percentile p-value Adjusted p-value1
TXNRD2 1% 18.2% (n=11) 20.0% (n=5) 0.93 0.93
5% 42.6% (n=47) 36.6% (n=41) 0.57 0.62
10% 43.2% (n=95) 42.9% (n=77) 0.97 0.97
ME3 1% 72.7% (n=11) 14.3% (n=7) 0.02 0.03
5% 51.4% (n=37) 44.4% (n=54) 0.52 0.62
10% 52.5% (n=80) 43.3% (n=90) 0.23 0.69
TXNRD2 + ME3 1% 88.9% (n=9) 33.3% (n=12) 0.01 0.03
5% 41.3% (n=46) 46.5% (n=43) 0.62 0.62
10% 46.6% (n=88) 41.9% (n=93) 0.53 0.80
1

Adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed using the False Discovery Rate (FDR) method

POAG= primary open-angle glaucoma; GRS= genetic risk score; mmHg= millimeters of mercury; SD= standard deviation