Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2023 May 13;166:212–223. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.05.011

Reducing the foreign body response on human cochlear implants and their materials in vivo with photografted zwitterionic hydrogel coatings

Ryan Horne 1,2, Nir Ben-Shlomo 3, Megan Jensen 3, Morgan Ellerman 2, Caleb Escudero 1, Rong Hua 3, Douglas Bennion 3, C Allan Guymon 2, Marlan R Hansen 3
PMCID: PMC10330692  NIHMSID: NIHMS1900682  PMID: 37187301

Abstract

The foreign body response to implanted materials often complicates the functionality of sensitive biomedical devices. For cochlear implants, this response can reduce device performance, battery life and preservation of residual acoustic hearing. As a permanent and passive solution to the foreign body response, this work investigates ultra-low-fouling poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) (pCBMA) thin film hydrogels that are simultaneously photo-grafted and photo-polymerized onto polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The cellular anti-fouling properties of these coatings are robustly maintained even after six-months subcutaneous incubation and over a broad range of cross-linker compositions. On pCBMA-coated PDMS sheets implanted subcutaneously, capsule thickness and inflammation are reduced significantly in comparison to uncoated PDMS or coatings of polymerized poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) (pPEGDMA). Further, capsule thickness is reduced over a wide range of pCBMA cross-linker compositions. On cochlear implant electrode arrays implanted subcutaneously for one year, the coating bridges over the exposed platinum electrodes and dramatically reduces the capsule thickness over the entire implant. Coated cochlear implant electrode arrays could therefore lead to persistent improved performance and reduced risk of residual hearing loss. More generally, the in vivo anti-fibrotic properties of pCBMA coatings also demonstrate potential to mitigate the fibrotic response on a variety of sensing/stimulating implants.

Keywords: foreign body response, zwitterionic hydrogels, anti-fouling, fibrotic capsule thickness, cochlear implants

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1900682-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Implantable devices, which have wide ranging medical applications including cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators, glucose monitors, and cochlear implants, have transformed patient health and outcomes. The utility of many of these biomedical devices, however, is limited by the biological responses to the foreign implant materials.[14] This foreign body response is characterized by persistent inflammation, macrophage infiltration and transformation to foreign body giant cells, and fibrotic capsule formation.[5] This immune response protects the in vivo environment from toxins, infection, chemical imbalance, cell lysis, and mechanical damage.[6] However, the foreign body response can also significantly impair the function of medically implanted devices. The inflammatory response can damage sensitive tissue structures, and fibrotic capsule formation can interrupt the intended interaction of the device with the host tissue. Encased in fibrotic scar tissue, these devices may not be able to stimulate, medicate, or sense with the desired degree of accuracy or precision.

For cochlear implants, if the stimulating electrode array becomes encased in fibrotic tissue through the foreign body response, the current flow is then spread, stimulating a wider population of target neurons, thereby resulting in decreased tonal specificity within the cochlea and diminished hearing outcomes.[7] Recently, hybrid cochlear implants have become critical for treating high frequency hearing loss in patients with preserved hearing at low frequencies.[8] However, the foreign body response in these patients can damage residual low-frequency hearing in addition to limiting the functionality of the cochlear implant to restore high-frequency hearing.[8, 9] In severe cases, the foreign body response can even lead to device malfunction or neo-ossification in the cochlea, preventing the possibility of reimplantation.[10]

The foreign body response evolves from initial protein adsorption to major tissue remodeling over the course of weeks to months. Immediately upon implantation, a foreign surface typically becomes deposited with ubiquitous in vivo proteins like fibrinogen and albumin.[11] Local immune cells, like neutrophils and later monocytes, recognize the deposited proteins and release pro-inflammatory signals.[12] As the response develops, macrophages adhere to the surface and attempt to engulf the foreign material, then gradually fuse into giant cells to form an immediate barrier around the implant.[12] Finally, fibroblasts are recruited and encase the giant cell layer in fibrotic tissue to further insulate the foreign material.[12]

If this cascade of protein deposition, cell adhesion and immune activation could be reduced, then the resulting giant cell and fibrotic capsule could be correspondingly decreased. Among the many approaches used to reduce the foreign body response, some have explored films of zwitterionic polymers or other hydrogel materials or to reduce protein deposition, cellular adhesion, and/or fibrotic capsule formation.[1315] Zwitterionic polymers, consisting of repeating units that each carry paired positive and negative charges that balance to a net zero charge, are of particular interest as they create an internal dipole that strongly attracts water molecules in a highly ordered scaffold around the polymer.[16] This scaffold limits interaction with other species, thereby reducing protein and cell attachment to the surface. Specific zwitterionic monomers have included carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA),[1719] 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC),[13, 2022] and sulfobetaine methacrylate (SBMA),[2325] all of which do show different degrees of reduced biofouling. Additionally, previous work has showed that pCBMA typically demonstrates higher anti-fouling, hydration, and mechanical properties than pSBMA and other zwitterionic polymers.[2628]

While many of these zwitterionic polymer systems can be effective at mitigating the foreign body response, they typically lack the robustness required to comprehensively coat medical implants for long-term use. The modulus of hydrogels is often less than that of biological soft tissue, leaving the hydrogel vulnerable to damage as a stand-alone material. This effect can be mitigated by using the hydrogel as a coating, as long as it remains durable through handling, implantation and long-term use. Additionally, using zwitterions to permanently coat chemically inert surfaces, such as those used in cochlear implant electrodes can be difficult, because effective coating methods typically rely on interactions with or reactivity of the surface. Unfortunately, fibrosis on the cochlear implant or other neural interface electrodes limits device function by significantly reducing electrical signal transduction to sensory cells. Additionally, recent work has shown that the cochlear implant electrodes themselves are even more potent aggravators of the foreign body response than other materials such as the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) housing.[29] One strategy has been to develop hydrogel coatings for cochlear implant materials that reduce protein and cellular adhesion, thus decreasing the capsule thickness in model systems.[3032]

Our work has focused on simultaneously photopolymerizing and photografting cross-linked zwitterionic monomers, specifically carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA), to PDMS.[33] The resulting polyCBMA (pCBMA) forms a durable thin film that can coat a variety of surface types and demonstrates robust anti-fouling for fibrinogen and macrophages in vitro and for bacteria in vivo.[26, 28, 33, 34] This strategy allows for dense packing of zwitterionic chains, creating a uniform hydrogel thin film firmly grafted to a cochlear implant or PDMS surface as shown in Figure 1. Prior work has characterized the photografting and photopolymerizing of thin film zwitterionic hydrogel coatings onto cochlear implants. Interestingly, these coatings reduce insertional friction into human cadaveric cochleae by ~50%.[34] Previous work has also shown that the incorporation of cross-linker is essential for in vitro anti-fouling properties.[26] At the same time, films formed with just a PEGDMA cross-linker were not as effective in preventing bioadhesion and proliferation as zwitterionic systems. A wide range of cross-linker compositions (5–50wt%) was observed to offer significant (order of magnitude) reduction of in vitro fouling.[26]

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The process for fabricating thin film zwitterionic hydrogels onto cochlear implant (CI) and related surfaces. The CI surface is first prepared with an acetone solution of benzophenone (BP), which is a surface grafting agent that generates free radicals on the surface upon exposure to UV light. The solvent is removed under vacuum and then the pre-monomer zwitterionic solution is applied which contains free carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA) zwitterionic monomers, poly[ethylene glycol] dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) cross-linking monomers, and Irgacure 2959 (Irg. 2959), a photoinitiator. Upon exposure to UV light, the benzophenone and Irg. 2959 generate radicals which trigger free-radical polymerization of the monomers via methacrylate groups.

While this prior work shows promise, in vivo assessment of the foreign body response, including ultimate fibrotic capsule thickness, is necessary to ascertain the true effect of photografted zwitterionic thin films on the foreign body response, as promising in vitro results are often not reproducible in vivo. Similarly, the effect of such a coating is best assessed on real medical devices, because different geometries, scales, materials, and handling impact the practicality of any surface modification.

The following studies assess the hypothesis that zwitterionic pCBMA hydrogel coatings reduce the foreign body response in vivo over both short and extended timeframes with specific focus on their application for cochlear implants. The longevity of the pCBMA coating is examined in vivo by imaging and quantitative maintenance of anti-fouling properties in a simple model system of PDMS sheets. The impact of hydrogel chemistry on in vivo fibrotic capsule thickness and the practicality of coated cylindrical implant geometry in vivo are assessed. Lastly, pCBMA thin films are applied to human cochlear implant electrode arrays subcutaneously in vivo to determine their capacity to reduce fibrotic capsules for one-year chronic implantations. Human cochlear implant electrode arrays are implanted subcutaneously in mice to enable the use of a small animal model to assess the effectiveness of an actual human device without the confounding effect of a traumatic insertion of a large device into the small, delicate mouse cochlea. These studies are designed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the coatings in vivo on commercial medical implants with multi-feature surfaces such as cochlear implant electrode arrays composed of platinum-iridium electrodes housed in PDMS.

Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Acetone, 4% paraformaldehyde, isoflurane, fluorescein sodium salt, fetal bovine serum, and Irgacure 2959 (2-hydroxy-1-[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy) phenyl]-2-methyl-1-propanone) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), TrypLE Express, Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium, Tissue-Tek OCT Compound, and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) were from ThermoFisher (Waltham, MA). (3-([2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethylammonio)propionate (CBMA) and PEG (molecular weight of 400 g/mol, approximately 9 repeat units) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA) were purchased from TCI Chemicals (Portland, OR) and Polysciences (Warrington, PA), respectively. Different poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) systems used included silastic tubing (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and non-reinforced medical grade silicone sheeting (0.01 in. thickness, Bentec Medical, Inc., Woodland, CA). Benzophenone was purchased from Acros Organics (NJ). An Omnicure S1500 lamp (Excelitas Technologies, Mississauga, Canada) was used for photocuring under pure nitrogen gas (Linde, Inc., Danbury, CT). The surfactant (Gelest, Morrisville, PA) used was dimethylsiloxane-acetoxy terminated ethylene oxide block copolymer (75% non-siloxane) and acted as a dispersing agent for coating cylindrical geometries.

2.2. Zwitterionic thin film fabrication on PDMS and cochlear implants

All zwitterionic thin film pre-polymer solutions were composed of 35wt% monomers, 0.8wt% surfactant, 0.05wt% Irgacure 2959 photoinitiator, and the remainder distilled water. The 35wt% monomer component was comprised of PEGDMA (cross-linker) and zwitterionic monomer (CBMA) to reach a desired percentage of cross-linker ranging from 0–100%. This prepolymer solution was used to coat medical grade PDMS in the form of sheets (12 mm × 5 mm × 0.25 mm), outside surfaces of small tubes, and cochlear implant devices for in vivo experiments. Initially, the PDMS pieces were placed in a 50 g/L benzophenone (surface grafting agent) acetone solution, soaked for 1 hour, and dried for 20 minutes in vacuum.

Prepolymer solution was then dispersed over the surface using a cover slip for flat surfaces. For curved tube surfaces (1.2 mm outer diameter and 12 mm long) an additional untreated PDMS sleeve (1.5 mm inner diameter and 12 mm long) with a longitudinal slit was used to evenly disperse the solution. The photografted hydrogel thin film was then formed by photopolymerization using a UV lamp for 10 minutes at 30 mW/cm2 under nitrogen flow to mitigate any oxygen inhibition. For the partially coated samples, light was exposed to the central area of the PDMS sheet leaving an approximately ~1mm region on the material edge that was not exposed. Following polymerization, the cover slip or untreated PDMS outer tube was peeled away under wet (distilled water) conditions with a razor blade. The sample was then thoroughly washed using a deionized water stream for at least 60 seconds to remove any residual solvent or unreacted monomers from the nascent hydrogel. The coated PDMS was stored in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and transferred to fresh sterile PBS prior to use.

The same coating method and photopolymerization conditions described above were applied to cochlear implants with minor modifications. Mid-scala and lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays were provided by Advanced Bionics (Santa Clarita, CA) and Cochlear (Sydney, Australia) respectively and were coated as above by insertion into a 0.76 mm inner diameter untreated PDMS tube with a longitudinal slit, filled with CBMA prepolymer solution incorporating 10wt% cross-linking monomer. To visually verify that the samples were successfully coated with the zwitterionic hydrogel, they were placed in sodium fluorescein dye of 20 mg/mL. The coating was sufficiently durable to retain its integrity after the cochlear implant relaxed to its curved state. No cracks, delamination events, or changes in the integrity of the coating were observed.

2.3. Implantation surgery

Samples were implanted in vivo in 8–10 week old CBA/J mice except for the partially coated implant experiment, which was conducted in BL/6 mice. Prior to any surgery, the implants were sterilized with UV light and surgical instruments were sterilized in an autoclave. All surgeries were conducted according to approved IACUC protocols (Iowa IACUC protocol number #1101569), including proper anesthesia, analgesia, sterile technique, and post-surgical monitoring. After isoflurane anesthesia of 1–5% as needed by pedal response, an incision was made in the interscapular space and the samples were inserted using sterile technique under the dermis. Incisions were closed with absorbable sutures. The mice were monitored for post-surgical complications, and any mice developing ulcerative skin lesions or unrelated health complications were euthanized. Equal numbers of males and females were included in each group.

2.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging

After removal of the implants from mouse tissue, implants were soaked three times in PBS for 1 hour each. The samples were then cut in cross-section, dried in ambient air for 2 days, and mounted with the cutting face visible onto carbon tape. The sample was then gold sputtered and visualized under 10 kV of voltage at a working distance of 7.8 mm and an emission current of 93 μA.

2.5. In vitro fibroblast density assay

Fibroblast adhesion and proliferation on both naïve and explanted materials was determined using methods described previously.[26] Briefly, fibroblasts from the spiral ligament of the cochlea were harvested from p2–5 CBA/J mice and treated with 0.12% trypsin and 0.2% collagenase for 10 minutes at 37°C followed by treatment with fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM). Cells were then plated and cultured in DMEM 10% FBS. Confluent fibroblasts were removed from the cell culture with TrypLE Express. Samples were then exposed to 1 mL of resuspended fibroblasts for 48 hours at 37°C. Cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS followed by immunostaning with anti-vimentin antibody (Abcam ab92547, 1:200) to label the fibroblasts followed by a secondary antibody (ThermoFischer, 1:400) labeled with Alexa 488. Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium contained DAPI to label nuclei. Fibroblast numbers were determined by capturing nine 20X images systematically per sample. For each sample, the mean number of fibroblasts per viewing field was averaged from the nine fields. Each condition was repeated with three samples. Samples used for this assay were either freshly prepared or explanted from mice after a six-month incubation and carefully cleaned by washing with PBS and removing remaining visible debris using pipette tips to prevent damage to the hydrogel. All samples were then soaked in sterile PBS for two days, washed in PBS three times, and then sterilized under UV light prior to their use in this assay.

2.6. Implant capsule tissue preservation for histology and immunohistochemistry

To harvest implants for histology and immunohistochemistry, the mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and treated with a depilatory agent. The implants were then excised together with the overlying skin and subdermal tissues. Samples were fixed with refrigerated 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight, then washed three times for 1 hour each in PBS. The samples were then prepared for 1 hour each in successive PBS solutions of 10wt%, 20wt%, and 30wt% sucrose. Finally, the samples were placed in a 50:50 volume mixture of 30wt% sucrose in PBS embedding medium (Tissue-Tek OCT Compound) overnight at 4°C. The samples were then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and sectioned on a LEICA CryoJane system to create 20μm thick sections. Sections were collected from a plane 3 mm deep from the leading edge of the implant to avoid edge effects.

2.7. Histology capsule thickness analysis

Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) were imaged with a light microscope at 4x and 20x magnification. The skin-facing side of the implant was systematically analyzed for capsule thickness at 20x magnification by measuring in ImageJ the distance from the implant interface through the basophilic cell layer to the transition from dark, thick eosinophilic (pink) banding to light eosinophilic banding. The average thickness was then calculated across the cross-section and reported for each sample.

2.8. Cochlear implant post-explant preparation, embedding, and sectioning

To prepare tissues encasing cochlear implant electrode arrays for sectioning, a modified epoxy embedding protocol was followed and is detailed in the Supplemental information. Coating cochlear implant electrode arrays and assessing the capsule thickness formed in vivo represents a technical challenge. First, properly and permanently coating the exposed platinum electrode is difficult because typical metal grafting approaches rely on chemical modification at the surface, but the platinum electrodes are inert. The approach here leveraged the internal cohesion of hydrogel to span the platinum electrode regions from surrounding anchored hydrogel regions on PDMS. The second challenge is in preparing the tissues containing cochlear implant electrode arrays for sectioning. A specimen with an electrode array in fibrotic subcutaneous tissue demonstrates very different stiffnesses that make traditional sectioning techniques infeasible. The approach here used a stiff epoxy resin to embed the specimen followed by sectioning with a diamond knife to cut through the stiff, hard cochlear implant electrodes while still preserving the integrity of the surrounding tissue and implant housing.

Pre-curved mid-scala cochlear implant arrays were straightened with a stylet and photografted with pCBMA hydrogels. The stylet was then removed and, importantly, the thin film withstood the recurving of the electrode array. This is significant since electrode arrays adopt a curved configuration when placed within the spiral shaped cochlea. Coated and uncoated mid-scala cochlear implant arrays were then implanted subcutaneously for one year to determine the degree of foreign body response in a long-term setting. Over this time frame, any foreign body response should reflect the lifetime impact. The implants were then removed, prepared for embedding, photographed (Fig. 7AB), and embedded in resin (Fig. 7CD) for sectioning. Sections were cut with a diamond knife at a thickness of 1 micrometer and stained with Toluidine Blue. Sections were collected from the cross-section of an exposed electrode interface. The presence or absence of grafted coating was confirmed by light microscopy of the sections to form groups of uncoated and pCBMA coated electrodes. Capsule thickness was assessed as described above, treating the regions of exposed PDMS and platinum separately.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

CBMA thin films reduce 1-year in vivo fibrotic capsule thickness subcutaneously on human cochlear implant electrodes. The left column (A, C, E, G, and black bars of I) represent uncoated electrodes and the right column (B, D, F, H, and blue bars of I) represent CBMA-coated electrodes. The top row shows images of cleared uncoated (A) and coated (B) cochlear implants after 1 year of implantation in subcutaneous mouse tissue and shortly before embedding in LWR resin. The 2nd row shows images of uncoated (C) and coated (D) cochlear implants embedded in LWR resin and cut in cross-section in the middle of an exposed platinum electrode (labeled “Pt face”) as it is housed in PDMS (labeled “PDMS face”). The 3rd row shows 20x magnification images of 1 μm sections of uncoated (E) and coated (F, coating which is pink in appearance labeled “Thin Film”) platinum electrode faces (labeled “Pt”) stained with Toluidine blue, with the fibrotic capsule thickness labeled in red lines. In the coated electrode (F), these red lines are small so their location is indicated with red arrows. The 4th row shows similar 20x magnification images, but of the PDMS-housing face of the implant, again stained with Toluidine blue and the capsule thickness indicated in red for uncoated (G) and coated (H, coating which is pink in appearance is labeled “Thin Film”). The graph in (I) shows capsule thickness as a function of PDMS vs Pt (platinum) surface and uncoated (black circles) vs coated (blue squares). Two-way ANOVA reveals a significant difference for uncoated vs coated groups of p=0.026. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n=3–4. Scale bars apply to subsequent images until a new scale bar is given.

2.9. Statistical methods

The confidence interval required for significance was set at 95% (p<0.05). In experiments with more than two independent variables, a two-way ANOVA was first conducted to detect which variables, if any, accounted for meaningful differences. If the threshold of statistical significance was met, then post-hoc Tukey tests were conducted to compare groups within statistically significant variables. One-way ANOVA was conducted on experiments with one independent variable and more than two groups, and follow-up Tukey tests conducted on statistically significant variables. For experiments comparing just two groups, Student’s t-test was used. All data in each experimental group were confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test to be normally distributed, taken as a test significance greater than 0.05.

Results

3.1. Characterization of pCBMA grafted thin films

Photografted zwitterionic pCBMA thin films coatings were applied to a variety of surface geometries and characterized as shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2A demonstrates the hydrophilic properties of the zwitterionic coating, which readily absorbs the water solution colored with sodium fluorescein dye, as compared to uncoated PDMS, which fails to absorb the dye solution. For long-term analysis of thin film persistence, coated and uncoated PDMS sheets were implanted subcutaneously for six months and then imaged by SEM, using cross-sections to evaluate for the presence of the thin film as shown in Fig. 2BC. The thin film appears uniform and undamaged even after extended implantation suggesting that the hydrogels are durable and remain adhered to the PDMS in vivo. These same zwitterionic coatings were also photografted to lateral-wall cochlear implant electrode arrays. Images of uncoated (Fig. 2D) and coated (Fig. 2E) arrays are shown after being soaked in dye solution. A thin, uniform coating over the surface of the whole electrode array is evident, demonstrating the ability to coat cylindrical surfaces. Critically, the coating spans both regions of the PDMS housing and platinum electrodes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Thin film zwitterionic hydrogels on PDMS. First shown are (A) gross images of (starting from the left) uncoated PDMS, uncoated PDMS stained with water-tracing fluorescein dye, coated PDMS, and coated PDMS stained with water-tracing fluorescein dye (green). SEM images are shown of (B) uncoated PDMS and (C) coated PDMS both after 6-month implantation in subcutaneous mouse tissue. Also shown are pictures of straight cochlear implant electrode arrays that are (D) uncoated and (E) coated and stained with concentrated water-tracing fluorescein dye (orange). Scale bar in (B) applies to (C).

3.2. Fibroblast adhesion and proliferation in vitro after subcutaneous incubation

To determine the effect of pCBMA cross-link density on anti-fouling properties, in vitro fibroblast adhesion and proliferation was assessed on pCBMA coatings with 1.6%–31% cross-linker either freshly made or after six months of subcutaneous incubation. Shown in Fig. 3 are representative images of the fibroblast density assay on PDMS (Fig. 3A) and to PDMS coated with pCBMA hydrogel thin films of increasing crosslinker (Fig. 3BE) with results quantified in Fig. 3F.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Thin film zwitterionic hydrogels prevent in vitro fibroblast adhesion when newly made and after subcutaneous implantation for 6 months. Representative images are shown of fibroblasts labeled with antivimentin antibody (green, to stain fibroblast cell body) and DAPI (blue, to stain nuclei) as they adhere to (A) explanted uncoated PDMS and explanted PDMS that had been coated with CBMA thin films of (B) 1.6%, (C) 5%, (D) 13%, and (E) 31% cross-link percentages. Shown graphically (F), fibroblast adhesion density normalized to uncoated samples was compared between uncoated (pair of leftmost columns) and CBMA-coated PDMS of specified cross-linker percentages (four pairs of rightmost columns) after 2-way ANOVA calculated a significant effect by surface modification. Each coated surface was compared against its respective uncoated control by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparisons test, and all were found to be significant p<0.02. Also compared was the group of new (black) and 6-month implants (grey) paired by surface type by 2-way ANOVA. These two groups were not significantly different from each other (p=0.73). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n=3. Scale bar applies to all images.

The fibroblasts on the uncoated PDMS (Fig. 3A) appear as a thick, confluent mat of well-attached cells. The cellular processes are outstretched with relatively large cell bodies, rich in vimentin (green) staining. Very few fibroblasts are found on the coated surfaces (Fig. 3BE). In addition to being much less dense, these cells display a more muted and compact morphology.

Accordingly, fibroblast density on these coated surfaces is an order of magnitude less than the density on PDMS (Fig. 3F). Additionally, all the pCBMA systems with various degrees of cross-linking differed significantly from the uncoated control with a p value of 0.02 or less by post-hoc Tukey tests. This provides evidence that all pCBMA thin films, regardless of cross-linker percentage, demonstrate durable and effective anti-fouling properties. The two-way ANOVA also showed no significant differences in fibroblast density between new samples and explanted samples (p=0.73), confirming that these properties persist even after long-term subcutaneous implantation.

3.3. Fibrotic capsule thickness and morphology

To determine whether macrophage [26] and fibroblast anti-fouling properties translate to a reduced foreign body response in vivo, PDMS implants with both coated (5wt% cross-linker) and uncoated regions were inserted into mice and removed after six weeks. The responses to uncoated regions differed substantially from the coated regions as shown in Fig. 4. The response to the uncoated region on the left of Fig. 4A is robust and highly cellular as depicted by a clearly defined dark basophilic (purple) interface next to thick, fibrous, highly cellular tissue. However, after progressing past the transition between coated and uncoated regions (shown in greater detail in Fig. 4B), the inflammatory response is only sustained for a few hundred micrometers and then dissipates. The interface with the pCBMA coating then continues without the intense cellular and fibrotic tissue found in the uncoated region. Thus, the pCBMA coating has a clear anti-fibrotic effect when directly compared in the same implant with a region of uncoated PDMS.

Figure 4 –

Figure 4 –

Zwitterionic thin films reduce fibrosis on PDMS. PDMS slabs with uncoated and CBMA-coated regions was implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of mice. After 6 weeks the implants were harvested, and sections containing the implants were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The CBMA hydrogel stains with eosin (pink) whereas the PDMS does not stain. Yellow dotted lines outline the fibrotic capsule and the arrows indicate thickness. The vertical black dotted line indicates the boundary between the coated and uncoated region. A wide view (A) and zoomed-in view (B) are provided.

To quantitatively analyze the impact of photografted thin films on the fibrotic response, implants were inserted subcutaneously in mice. Fig. 5 shows the resulting histology and capsule thickness analyses. Implants tested included uncoated PDMS controls (Fig. 5A) in addition to poly[poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate)] films (pPEGDMA, Fig. 5B) and 10% cross-linked pCBMA films (Fig. 5C), all subcutaneously implanted for six weeks and histologically analyzed for capsule thickness (indicated with a dotted yellow line and asterisk in Fig. 5D). It should be noted that 10% cross-linked poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) films were also prepared, but this mouse cohort developed ulcerative dermatitis surrounding the implant sites and required euthanasia within one week of implantation. This reaction to the implant, while lacking histology at six weeks, suggests that pHEMA thin films on PDMS exacerbate the inflammatory response to the implanted materials.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Thin films of CBMA, not PEGDMA, best reduce capsule thickness on uncoated PDMS sheets. Images at 20x magnification are shown of fibrotic capsule thicknesses (labeled with a yellow dashed line and asterisk) after 6 weeks in vivo on PDMS sheets that were uncoated (A), coated with 100% PEGDMA (B), and coated with 10% cross-linked CBMA (C). Tissue samples were stained by H&E to show basophilic cells (purple) and eosinophilic (pink) regions of fibrous tissue. One way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the mean capsule thicknesses of uncoated vs PEGDMA vs CBMA (D). Post-hoc Tukey tests show that CBMA and uncoated PDMS capsule thicknesses are significantly different (p=0.010) while PEGDMA fails to show any statistical difference to uncoated PDMS (p=0.061). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n=3–5. Scale bar applies to all images.

The capsule on the pCBMA coated implant shows much less foreign body response pathology than either of the controls. The accompanying capsule is much less pronounced, with a mean thickness of 27 μm compared to 82 μm for uncoated and 43 μm for pPEGDMA (Fig. 5D). Statistically, capsule thickness is significantly different when comparing uncoated, pPEGDMA, and pCBMA (Fig. 5D) by one-way ANOVA. Additionally, post-hoc Tukey tests reveal that the capsule thickness decrease in pCBMA relative to uncoated PDMS is significant (p=0.010), and that the pPEGDMA narrowly fails to reach the threshold of significance (p=0.061).

On uncoated PDMS (Fig. 5A), a dense infiltrate of basophilic cells immediately at the interface is evident. These cells dominate the otherwise lightly eosinophilic (pink) and fibrous connective tissue with densely packed basophilic bodies. Directly adjacent to this basophilic milieu, a band of intense eosinophilic stain reveals tightly packed fibers running parallel to the interface. This fibrous tissue forms a continuous barrier around the implant. Moving away from the dense fibrous tissue towards the skin, the tissue suddenly stains less eosinophilic, fewer cells are present, and connective fibers appear loosely organized and randomly oriented, which is typical of loose connective tissue found in normal subdermal tissue. The thickness measurements and analysis therefore focus on the pathology of the inflammatory, dense, fibrous capsule.

When the implant is coated with a thin film of zwitterionic hydrogel (Fig. 5C), the appearance of the implant-tissue interface is quite different. First, the hydrogel itself is clearly visible as a bright, uniform, acellular, eosinophilic band under H&E staining. The interface with the tissue begins at the edge of this band where cells first appear. At this interface, the tissue either appears as loose connective tissue or as a one or two nuclei-wide basophilic band which quickly gives way to a narrow band of deeply eosinophilic fibers outwards toward the skin. Typically, this band is limited in scope or even absent. Overall, the tissue response immediately around the zwitterionic coated system appears much less basophilic and cellular than the tissue seen around an uncoated implant. The adjacent tissue moving away from the thin film stains much more lightly eosinophilic. Taken together, these findings indicate a thinner capsule and diminished foreign body response to the pCBMA coating.

The grafted thin film composed of cross-linker molecules only (pPEGDMA) was tested as a non-zwitterionic hydrogel control. The scar capsule and morphology are interestingly more like those found in uncoated PDMS rather than those seen in response to the pCBMA thin film. pPEGDMA was selected as a control both because it is used in small amounts (10–20%) as a cross-linker in the pCBMA films and also a well-studied biomaterial.[35] The immediate interface appears as an intense, thick, basophilic region with multinucleated giant cells (Fig. 5B). The hydrogel itself is visible as a relatively thin, cloudy, blue-gray band that appears to be missing in regions across the surface, suggesting that the pPEGDMA hydrogel likely does not adhere effectively in all regions to the underlying PDMS. Where the film is present, a thin line of cells is observed between the PDMS and pPEGDMA film, implying that adhesive failure of the film likely occurred during the implantation period and that the void formed in vivo. To this point, all films were confirmed to be intact and defect-free prior to insertion. Therefore, the pPEGDMA film appears unable to fully withstand the in vivo environment.

3.4. Fibrotic capsule thickness as a function of cross-link density

To determine if capsule thickness and morphology are influenced by cross-linking, pCBMA thin films of 0–50wt% cross-linker were subcutaneously implanted for six weeks and analyzed by H&E staining. Additionally, it is also important to assess whether the photografting process and coating durability could be effective in vivo with cylindrical substrate geometry. Following the implantation, capsule thickness was analyzed as shown in Fig. 6. The uncoated control (Fig. 6A) histology reveals a well demarcated band of fibrosis encompassing the implant (marked with a dotted line and asterisk) including a layer of dense, basophilic cells immediately at the interface, consistent with previous results. Some of the nuclei at the surface appear conglomerated into giant cells, a typical development of the late-stage foreign body response. The deep, intense eosinophilic staining of the overall capsule sharply contrasts with the lightly stained surrounding tissue.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

CBMA hydrogel thin films of a broad range of cross-linker percentages reduce fibrotic capsule thickness on cylindrical PDMS. Images at 20x magnification are shown of fibrotic capsule thicknesses (labeled with a yellow dashed line and asterisk) after 6 weeks in vivo on PDMS cylinders of uncoated PDMS (A) and CBMA coated samples of 0% (B), 5% (C), 10% (D), 25% (E), and 50% (F) cross-linker percentages. Tissue samples were stained by H&E to show basophilic cells (purple) and eosinophilic (pink) regions of fibrous tissue. The graph shows the mean capsule thickness plotted as a function of surface type (D), with significance of a comparison to PDMS summarized “ns” for not significant, “*” for p<0.05, and “**” for p<0.01. One way ANOVA yielded a significant difference between groups at p=0.0044 and was followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, using uncoated PDMS as the control. Compared to uncoated, the cross-linker percentages were not significant for 0% (p=0.3322) and significant for 5% (p=0.0039), 10% (p=0.0031), 25% (p=0.0031), and 50% (p=0.0265). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n=3. Scale bar applies to all images, all imaged at 20x magnification.

A control without cross-linker was also examined, because this formulation is expected to only form relatively weak pCBMA strands grafted from the surface and lack anti-fouling properties. This control lacked evidence of any significant coating after sectioning (Fig. 5B) and elicited a robust capsule of similar thickness to uncoated PDMS. The capsule itself matches the intense eosinophilic banding seen in the uncoated sample, although without the same degree of interfacial basophilic cells.

The capsule is quite different, however, at the interface with cross-linked pCBMA thin films (Fig. 6CF). Starting with the pCBMA thin film of 5% cross-linker (Fig. 6C), the thin film itself stains an acellular orange and interfaces with a limited band of cellular, basophilic fibrosis. Interestingly, the coloring and stain of these cells lack the intensity seen in the uncoated sample. The capsule thickness is also reduced by a factor of 2 compared to both uncoated and uncross-linked samples. Similar observations apply to the pCBMA coating of 10% cross-linker (Fig. 6D), although this capsule appears to have far fewer interfacial cells and is mostly a thin band of eosinophilic capsule. The 25% cross-linker capsule (Fig. 6E) is less defined. The material interface exhibits a faint band of increased eosinophilia and slightly more concentrated cells, but appears the most similar overall to normal loose connective tissue. As the film becomes more cross-linked and richer in PEGDMA, it is reasonable to believe that characteristics will more closely match that of the pure PEGDMA film from Fig. 5B. We find that the 50% cross-linked CBMA film (Fig. 6F) remains intact, shows bright staining on H&E, and mitigates capsule development, although not as consistently or strongly as lower cross-link percentages. The capsule bears a slight enrichment in cells and demonstrates eosinophilic banding, but not as intensely as the uncoated sample.

One-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant variation between groups (p=0.0044). Follow-up Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests compared each group to the uncoated control. While the 0% cross-linker implant capsule appeared the same statistically as the one on uncoated PDMS (p=0.33), all cross-linked films had a statistically significant decrease in their mean capsule thickness compared to uncoated.

3.5. One-year fibrotic capsule thickness on human cochlear implant electrode arrays

To assess the in vivo anti-fibrotic effect of zwitterionic thin films on medical implants, pCBMA coatings of 10wt% cross-linker were applied to cochlear implant electrode arrays and implanted subcutaneously for one year.

Cross-sections were cut from electrode-bearing regions and stained with Toluidine Blue. Sample images are shown in Fig. 7 for uncoated platinum electrodes (Fig. 7E), coated platinum electrodes (Fig. 7F), uncoated PDMS housing (Fig. 7G), and coated PDMS housing (Fig. 7H). The capsule thicknesses were measured for each electrode and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (Fig. 7I). The capsule surrounding the uncoated platinum electrode is thick and appears almost pyramidal in shape, the apex being positioned over the middle of the electrode face. The cellular architecture immediately at the interface of the platinum also suggests a sustained presence of immune cells. The fibrotic capsule is thick, banded, and clearly identified from the surrounding minimally stained adipose tissue.

The zwitterionic coating on the platinum (Fig. 7F) is easily identified by the presence of the pink-stained coating which is positioned between the black, opaque platinum face and the surrounding tissue. A minimal band of fibrosis is present, but the intense fibrosis observed in the uncoated platinum is largely absent. The thin film itself remains intact and spans the region over the platinum electrode, showing a uniform film that completely encapsulates both the PDMS and platinum-iridium surfaces. It should be noted that the platinum appears fractured as an artifact of sectioning stresses but remained intact during implantation as evidenced by the intact electrodes on the cutting faces of Fig. 7CD.

A clear difference is also observed between the capsule on uncoated and coated PDMS housing. The fibrotic capsule of uncoated PDMS stains deep blue and exhibits the typical parallel banding of fibrotic capsules. The pCBMA coated system induces a much thinner capsule, as shown in Fig. 7H. It should be noted that due to the difficulty of sectioning, implant elements may have shifted slightly during sectioning, especially in terms of the exact positioning of the thin film relative to the tissue. The PDMS housing itself does not absorb any stain and so appears colorless.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference between coated and uncoated mean capsule thickness. The mean capsule thickness for an uncoated cochlear implant was 47 μm but was 60% less at 18 μm for a coated cochlear implant. While a statistical difference was not observed between PDMS and platinum surfaces, the platinum surface appears to have elicited a stronger response, consistent with previous studies.[29] Very little variability was observed in capsule thickness for coated samples. On the other hand, variability was high in uncoated samples.

Discussion

This work demonstrates for the first time the in vivo anti-fibrotic effect of a photografted zwitterionic hydrogel thin film on medical device materials. Specifically, the capsule thickness surrounding coated materials is reduced and histologically shows fewer interfacial cells and reduced fibrotic tissue (Fig. 4Fig. 7). When conventional (pPEGDMA, pHEMA) and zwitterionic hydrogel thin films (pCBMA) are compared (Fig. 5), zwitterionic films exhibit a greater degree of durability, compatibility, and anti-fibrotic effects. In particular, pPEGDMA thin films do not remain intact over a six-week incubation in vivo and pHEMA films on PDMS induce ulceration, whereas pCBMA films remain intact while reducing capsule thickness.

This work also highlights the ability to photograft zwitterionic thin films on flat (Fig. 2A, Fig. 4, Fig. 5) and cylindrical (Fig. 2G, Fig. 6, Fig. 7) geometries while maintaining anti-fibrotic properties. Multiple experiments show that the anti-fouling effect of zwitterionic hydrogels is consistently observed for zwitterionic thin films of 2wt% to 50wt% cross-linker (Fig. 3, Fig. 6). These results also demonstrate that thin films are both physically present and functionally unchanged in vivo at durations of six months (Fig. 2, Fig. 3) and one year (Fig. 7).

The results suggest two potential independent mechanisms for the change in tissue response to a coated surface. The mechanism best supported by the data is that decreased attachment of fibroblasts (Fig. 3) and other immune cells drives the reduction in fibrosis seen on coated implants. Decreased adhesion of any agent of the foreign body response, whether fibrinogen, macrophage, or fibroblast, would be expected to dampen the inflammatory cascade necessary for producing a fibrotic capsule.

While the anti-adhesion properties of zwitterionic thin films are likely contributing significantly to this capsule-reducing effect, another potential mechanism could also be active. The microenvironment at the interface of a coated implant may mimic the endogenous environment better than that of an uncoated implant in topography, elastic modulus, and/or chemistry. If this microenvironment better resembles native tissues, it would likely trigger fewer inflammatory interactions and less local signaling. Potential evidence of this effect can be seen in Fig. 4, where regions of coating that closely border uncoated regions still receive local inflammatory signals, while those regions far (e.g. more than ~600 μm) from uncoated sites appear relatively protected from pro-inflammatory signaling. This mechanism could also account for reduced capsule thickness even when cells do ultimately colonize the implant interface.

Interestingly, the anti-fouling effects observed in vitro for fibroblasts and in vivo for capsule thickness are largely comparable for thin films which vary from 2wt% to at least 25wt% cross-linker. These findings are consistent with previous work which showed homogeneity of fibrinogen and macrophage anti-fouling properties over the same cross-linking range, while simultaneously varying the compressive modulus by at least an order of magnitude.[26] These results also support the previously reported in vitro findings that cross-linker is necessary to enable signficant anti-fouling properties on a surface via dense, networked, grafted pCBMA polymer chains.[26] Altogether, these data show that these films have consistent anti-fouling properties over a relatively broad range of compressive moduli.

Despite the historically difficult nature of permanently modifying inert metal surfaces, this coating innovation demonstrates the ability to mitigate capsule formation around platinum electrodes (Fig. 7). The pyramidal geometry of the fibrosis on uncoated electrodes suggests that immune interactions at the platinum interface produce a local signal for intense foreign body response activation that is maximized in the center of the exposed platinum.[29] Minimal fibrosis is observed on the coated electrode faces. This result is promising not just for cochlear implant electrode arrays, but also for any electrode-based device that would benefit from an in vivo anti-fibrotic effect such as glucose monitors and deep brain stimulators. In this work, the thin films benefitted from anchoring regions of PDMS housing to help adhere to these electrodes and proved effective for covering ~0.5 mm electrode leaflets that were recessed into the PDMS housing. The evidence suggests that the film remained flush with the electrode surface, otherwise it would have seen cellular infiltration in the gap like was observed with imperfectly adhered pPEGDMA films (Fig. 4B).

Interestingly, the coating on the cochlear implant seems to mask the differences in the underlying surface material, and no difference was observed between coated platinum and PDMS surfaces. With a higher-powered study, any interaction between coating status and difference between platinum and PDMS effects might become discernable. However, the goal of this experiment was to determine whether coating a cochlear implant electrode array showed a demonstrable effect on capsule thickness over a chronic implantation. In that respect, the study accomplished its aims.

For cochlear implants in particular, a capsule thickness reduction of 50–70% could have dramatic implications for auditory performance. Reducing fibrosis could help mitigate the gradual increase in electrode impedances that occurs in the months following implantation and lead to reduced current spread and improved battery life. Further, delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation has been associated with intracochlear fibrosis and increased electrode impedance.[3639] Thus, to the extent that zwitterionic thin film coatings reduce fibrosis, they may also be expected to mitigate loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.[40, 41]

This work is based on a mouse subcutaneous model for assessing the extent of the foreign body response to implants, which offers some advantages and disadvantages. The subcutaneous model enabled an assessment of the foreign body response in isolation from the potentially confounding effect of cochlear trauma. Importantly, we have already shown that these zwitterionic thin films dramatically reduce surface friction of PDMS leading to a reduction in insertion forces for cochlear implant electrode arrays in human cadaveric cochleae.[34] A subcutaneous mouse model enables evaluation of anti-fibrotic performance of a human cochlear implant electrode array. Implants sized for humans were desirable because they were large enough to feasibly coat using the sleeve polymerization described in the methods. Human implants of course have an advantage over miniaturized implants because they best reflect actual clinical use. Further, they are available in pre-curved configurations to mimic the shape of the electrode array when placed in the cochlea. However, some elements of the subcutaneous model limit the study. For one, the impact of zwitterionic hydrogels on mitigating cochlea-specific responses like neo-ossification remains unknown. The biology or anatomy of the cochlea could possibly limit the functionality of a zwitterionic hydrogel in ways yet to be understood. Further, improvements in cochlear implant electrode array performance can only be explicitly assessed with a functional implant in a living cochlea. To address these limitations, future work will investigate the effect of zwitterionic thin films on fibrosis, electrical impedance, and neo-ossification using functional human cochlear implants implanted in cochleae of large animals.

Conclusions

This study shows the potent anti-fibrotic effect of photografted pCBMA thin films on implant materials including PDMS in different geometries and cochlear implant electrode arrays. This study provides in vivo evidence that a wide range of cross-linker compositions can be effectively used in coatings to mitigate the foreign body response. These pCBMA coatings are durable and maintain their properties over six-month and one-year long incubations. The reduction in fibrotic capsule thickness offered by this passive, durable thin film is sustained in vivo up to one year, which is promising for implants needing long-term protection. For a cochlear implant, a coated electrode may lead to enhanced hearing performance and reduce risk of loss of residual hearing. These findings stand to benefit not just outcomes for cochlear implants, but also many other neural prostheses or other medical devices that would show enhanced performance or fewer complications with reduced fibrosis.

Supplementary Material

1

Statement of Significance.

This article presents, for the first time, evidence of the in vivo anti-fibrotic effect of zwitterionic hydrogel thin films photografted to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and human cochlear implant arrays. The hydrogel coating shows no evidence of degradation or loss of function after long-term implantation. The coating process enables full coverage of the electrode array. The coating reduces fibrotic capsule thickness 50–70% over a broad range of cross-link densities for implantations from six weeks to one year.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (5T32DC000040, T32GM139776, F30DC019274, and R01DC012578) and by the University of Iowa UI Ventures fund.

The authors would also like to thank Advanced Bionics for donating inactive mid-scala human cochlear implant electrode arrays and Cochlear for donating inactive Nucleus Slim Straight human cochlear implant electrode arrays. Additionally, the authors acknowledge Jianqiang Shao for extensive assistance with the sectioning and embedding of the explanted cochlear implant electrode arrays and Brian Mostaert for troubleshooting and designing effective tissue sectioning methods.

Footnotes

Declaration of interests

The authors declare the following financial interests which may be considered as potential competing interests:

“Durable photopolymerizable cross-linked anti-fouling coatings” as an active patent (JP7005535B2, CN109562202B, AU2017280359B2) or patent pending (CA3028732A1, US20200308440A1).

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Gifford R, Continuous Glucose Monitoring: 40 Years, What We′ve Learned and What’s Next, ChemPhysChem 14(10) (2013) 2032–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Miller PM, Gross RE, Wire Tethering or ‘Bowstringing’ as a Long-Term Hardware-Related Complication of Deep Brain Stimulation, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 87(6) (2009) 353–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Kharbikar BN, Chendke GS, Desai TA, Modulating the foreign body response of implants for diabetes treatment, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 174 (2021) 87–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Seyyedi M, Nadol JB Jr., Intracochlear Inflammatory Response to Cochlear Implant Electrodes in Humans, Otology & Neurotology 35(9) (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT, Foreign body reaction to biomaterials, Seminars in Immunology 20(2) (2008) 86–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Pagán AJ, Ramakrishnan L, The Formation and Function of Granulomas, Annual Review of Immunology 36(1) (2018) 639–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Nadol JB Jr., Eddington DK, Burgess BJ, Foreign Body or Hypersensitivity Granuloma of the Inner Ear After Cochlear Implantation: One Possible Cause of a Soft Failure?, Otology & Neurotology 29(8) (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Friedmann DR, Peng R, Fang Y, McMenomey SO, Roland JT, Waltzman SB, Effects of loss of residual hearing on speech performance with the CI422 and the Hybrid-L electrode, Cochlear Implants International 16(5) (2015) 277–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ishiyama A, Doherty J, Ishiyama G, Quesnel AM, Lopez I, Linthicum FH, Post Hybrid Cochlear Implant Hearing Loss and Endolymphatic Hydrops, Otology & Neurotology 37(10) (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Foggia MJ, Quevedo RV, Hansen MR, Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials, Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 4(6) (2019) 678–683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Wells LA, Guo H, Emili A, Sefton MV, The profile of adsorbed plasma and serum proteins on methacrylic acid copolymer beads: Effect on complement activation, Biomaterials 118 (2017) 74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kastellorizios M, Tipnis N, Burgess DJ, Foreign Body Reaction to Subcutaneous Implants, Immune Responses to Biosurfaces: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions 865 (2015) 93–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Ham J, Kim Y, An T, Kang S, Ha C, Wufue M, Kim Y, Jeon B, Kim S, Kim J, Choi TH, Seo J-H, Kim DW, Park J-U, Lee Y, Covalently Grafted 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl Phosphorylcholine Networks Inhibit Fibrous Capsule Formation around Silicone Breast Implants in a Porcine Model, ACS applied materials & interfaces 12(27) (2020) 30198–30212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Yong Y, Qiao M, Chiu A, Fuchs S, Liu Q, Pardo Y, Worobo R, Liu Z, Ma M, Conformal Hydrogel Coatings on Catheters To Reduce Biofouling, Langmuir 35(5) (2019) 1927–1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Jiang S, Cao Z, Ultralow-Fouling, Functionalizable, and Hydrolyzable Zwitterionic Materials and Their Derivatives for Biological Applications, Advanced Materials 22(9) (2010) 920–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Blackman LD, Gunatillake PA, Cass P, Locock KES, An introduction to zwitterionic polymer behavior and applications in solution and at surfaces, Chemical Society Reviews 48(3) (2019) 757–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Carr LR, Xue H, Jiang S, Functionalizable and nonfouling zwitterionic carboxybetaine hydrogels with a carboxybetaine dimethacrylate crosslinker, Biomaterials 32(4) (2011) 961–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Cheng G, Li G, Xue H, Chen S, Bryers JD, Jiang S, Zwitterionic carboxybetaine polymer surfaces and their resistance to long-term biofilm formation, Biomaterials 30(28) (2009) 5234–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yang W, Xue H, Carr LR, Wang J, Jiang S, Zwitterionic poly(carboxybetaine) hydrogels for glucose biosensors in complex media, Biosens Bioelectron 26(5) (2011) 2454–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Chen M, Briscoe WH, Armes SP, Klein J, Lubrication at Physiological Pressures by Polyzwitterionic Brushes, Science 323(5922) (2009) 1698–1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Goda T, Konno T, Takai M, Moro T, Ishihara K, Biomimetic phosphorylcholine polymer grafting from polydimethylsiloxane surface using photo-induced polymerization, Biomaterials 27(30) (2006) 5151–5160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Jansen LE, Amer LD, Chen EYT, Nguyen TV, Saleh LS, Emrick T, Liu WF, Bryant SJ, Peyton SR, Zwitterionic PEG-PC Hydrogels Modulate the Foreign Body Response in a Modulus-Dependent Manner, Biomacromolecules 19(7) (2018) 2880–2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Smith RS, Zhang Z, Bouchard M, Li J, Lapp HS, Brotske GR, Lucchino DL, Weaver D, Roth LA, Coury A, Biggerstaff J, Sukavaneshvar S, Langer R, Loose C, Vascular catheters with a nonleaching poly-sulfobetaine surface modification reduce thrombus formation and microbial attachment, Sci Transl Med 4(153) (2012) 153ra132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wu L, Jasinski J, Krishnan S, Carboxybetaine, sulfobetaine, and cationic block copolymer coatings: A comparison of the surface properties and antibiofouling behavior, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 124(3) (2012) 2154–2170. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Zhang Z, Chao T, Chen S, Jiang S, Superlow fouling sulfobetaine and carboxybetaine polymers on glass slides, Langmuir 22(24) (2006) 10072–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Jensen MJ, Peel A, Horne R, Chamberlain J, Xu L, Hansen MR, Guymon CA, Antifouling and Mechanical Properties of Photografted Zwitterionic Hydrogel Thin-Film Coatings Depend on the Cross-Link Density, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 7(9) (2021) 4494–4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Peel A, Horne R, Bennion DM, Guymon CA, Hansen MR, Durability of photografted zwitterionic hydrogel coatings for reduction of the foreign body response to cochlear implants, bioRxiv (2022) 2022.06.24.497518. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Shen N, Cheng E, Whitley JW, Horne RR, Leigh B, Xu L, Jones BD, Guymon CA, Hansen MR, Photograftable Zwitterionic Coatings Prevent Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Adhesion to PDMS Surfaces, ACS Applied Bio Materials 4(2) (2021) 1283–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Jensen MJ, Claussen AD, Higgins T, Vielman-Quevedo R, Mostaert B, Xu L, Kirk J, Hansen MR, Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response, Hearing research (2022) 108597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Wrzeszcz A, Steffens M, Balster S, Warnecke A, Dittrich B, Lenarz T, Reuter G, Hydrogel coated and dexamethasone releasing cochlear implants: Quantification of fibrosis in guinea pigs and evaluation of insertion forces in a human cochlea model, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 103(1) (2015) 169–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Hadler C, Aliuos P, Brandes G, Warnecke A, Bohlmann J, Dempwolf W, Menzel H, Lenarz T, Reuter G, Wissel K, Polymer Coatings of Cochlear Implant Electrode Surface - An Option for Improving Electrode-Nerve-Interface by Blocking Fibroblast Overgrowth, PloS one 11(7) (2016) e0157710–e0157710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Ceschi P, Bohl A, Sternberg K, Neumeister A, Senz V, Schmitz KP, Kietzmann M, Scheper V, Lenarz T, Stöver T, Paasche G, Biodegradable polymeric coatings on cochlear implant surfaces and their influence on spiral ganglion cell survival, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 102(6) (2014) 1255–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Leigh BL, Cheng E, Xu L, Derk A, Hansen MR, Guymon CA, Antifouling Photograftable Zwitterionic Coatings on PDMS Substrates, Langmuir 35(5) (2019) 1100–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Bennion DM, Horne R, Peel A, Reineke P, Henslee A, Kaufmann C, Guymon CA, Hansen MR, Zwitterionic Photografted Coatings of Cochlear Implant Biomaterials Reduce Friction and Insertion Forces, Otology & Neurotology 42(10) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Killion JA, Geever LM, Devine DM, Kennedy JE, Higginbotham CL, Mechanical properties and thermal behaviour of PEGDMA hydrogels for potential bone regeneration application, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 4(7) (2011) 1219–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Quesnel AM, Nakajima HH, Rosowski JJ, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Nadol JB, Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology, Hearing research 333 (2016) 225–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Jensen MJ, Isaac H, Hernandez H, Oleson J, Dunn C, Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Timing of Acoustic Hearing Changes After Cochlear Implantation, The Laryngoscope 132(10) (2022) 2036–2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Tejani VD, Yang H, Kim J-S, Hernandez H, Oleson JJ, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 23(1) (2022) 95–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Scheperle RA, Tejani VD, Omtvedt JK, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Oleson JJ, Ozanne MV, Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing, Hearing research 350 (2017) 45–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Rahman MT, Chari DA, Ishiyama G, Lopez I, Quesnel AM, Ishiyama A, Nadol JB, Hansen MR, Cochlear implants: Causes, effects and mitigation strategies for the foreign body response and inflammation, Hearing research 422 (2022) 108536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Tarabichi O, Jensen M, Hansen MR, Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery, Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 29(5) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES