Table 1.
Meta-analyses results on the effect of exercise interventions on negative symptoms
Study | Control group | Number of participants | Model | Effect size | 95% CI | P | I2, % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Sabe et al 2020 | AC | 954 | RE | SMD = −0.24 | −0.43 | −0.06 | 0.01 | 45 |
Vogel et al 2019 | AC | 1249 | RE | g = −0.43 | −0.20 | −0.67 | 0.00 | 76 |
Sabe et al 2019 | AC | 1081 | RE | SMD = −0.36 | −0.58 | −0.15 | 0.00 | 62 |
Lutgens et al 2017 | TAU | − | RE | g = −0.36 | −0.71 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 55 |
Firth et al 2015 | AC | 659 | RE | SMD = −0.44 | −0.78 | −0.09 | 0.01 | 0 |
Cramer et al 2013 | TAU | 198 | RE | SMD = −0.59 | −1.87 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 80 |
g, Hedges g; AC, any comparator; RE, random effects; SMD, standardised mean difference; TAU, treatment-as-usual.