Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 10;130(3):495–502. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522003452

Table 1.

Patient information materials provided by centres and received by patients

Type of information Centres Patients
n % n %
Disease-specific information 82/147 55·8* 352/509 69·2
Patient advocacy groups 98/147 66·7 NR
Nutrition 79/147 53·7 146/493 29·6
Sport/physical activity 69/147 46·9 85/491 17·3
Other 12/147 8·2 34/441 7·7

NR, not reported.

*

Urologists were asked: In your opinion, what methods could improve patient compliance with the treatment? (multiple answers are permitted)

• More time for explanations by reducing other time-consuming obligations

• Printed material/brochures to inform patients about the disease and the benefits and possible risks of treatment

• Material on the Internet to inform patients about the disease and the benefits and possible risks of treatment

• Inclusion of family members

• Public information campaign about prostatic carcinoma and its treatment

• Greater support for patient self-help organisations

• Frequent testing of the testosterone level as an easily communicable efficacy criterion

• Frequent testing of the PSA level as an easily communicable efficacy criterion

• Patient-friendly pharmaceutical form of hormone therapy

• Other: _________________________________

Urologists were asked: What concomitant measures do you suggest to your patients who have prostatic carcinoma?

○ Nutritional advice

○ Sports groups

○ Patient self-help organisations

Other: _________________________________