Abstract
Obesity and diabetes are risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the underlying mechanisms are yet to be elucidated. Adeno‐associated virus (AAV) frequently infects humans and has been widely used in gene therapy, but the risk of AAV infection such as HCC should be further evaluated. Here, we show that recombinant AAV injection caused liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and HCC in db/db or high‐fat diet‐induced hyperglycemic and obese mice, but not in mice with only hyperglycemia or obesity. Prednisone administration or knockdown of Pebp1, highly expressed in db/db mice, alleviated hepatic injury and necroptosis induced by recombinant AAV in mice with diabetes and obesity. Inhibition of Pebp1 pathway also attenuated inflammation and necroptosis in vitro. Our findings show that AAV infection is a critical risk factor for HCC in patients with diabetes and obesity, and AAV gene therapy for these patients should be carefully evaluated. Both prednisone treatment and targeting Pebp1 pathway are promising strategies to alleviate inflammation and necroptosis that occurred in AAV gene therapy or related diseases.
Keywords: diabetes, HCC, necroptosis, obesity, rAAV
Subject Categories: Cancer; Digestive System; Genetics, Gene Therapy & Genetic Disease
Hepatic necroptosis and HCC were caused by recombinant AAV injection in hyperglycemic and obese mice, which could be alleviated by prednisone administration or Pebp1/Tbk1 signaling inhibition.
The paper explained.
Problem
Obesity and diabetes are important risk factors for tumorigenesis, including liver cancer. Adeno‐associated virus (AAV), widely used for gene therapy, is found in around 30–80% of the population. However, whether environmental or therapeutical AAV infection is a critical risk factor for liver cancer in individuals with obesity and diabetes is yet to be elucidated.
Results
rAAV injection leads to liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and liver cancer in hyperglycemic and obese mice, but not in hyperglycemic and slim mice or euglycemic and obese mice. Prednisone administration markedly alleviated liver injury and hepatic necroptosis in hyperglycemic and obese mice. Inhibition of Pebp1/Tbk1 signaling also attenuated liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and subsequent liver cancer caused by rAAV injection in hyperglycemic and obese mice.
Impact
Environmental AAV infection or AAV gene therapy for individuals with hyperglycemia and obesity should be carefully evaluated. Both prednisone treatment and targeting Pebp1/Tbk1 signaling are promising strategies to prevent or treat AAV‐induced liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and related diseases including liver cancer.
Introduction
Both diabetes and obesity are considered as important risk factors for tumorigenesis, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; Marengo et al, 2016; Mantovani & Targher, 2017; Lega & Lipscombe, 2020; Plaz Torres et al, 2022). A case–control study showed that a history of diabetes could explain around 8% of cases of liver cancer in the population (La Vecchia et al, 1997). Similarly, a history of diabetes at baseline is highly associated with HCC without hepatitis B or C virus infections (Koh et al, 2013). A study in 362,552 Swedish men showed that obese men have a significantly increased risk of all cancers (Samanic et al, 2006). Moreover, a European cohort study also provided evidence of an association between obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, and the risk of HCC (Schlesinger et al, 2013). A national population‐based cohort study in Korean showed general obesity and central obesity are associated with an increased risk of HCC (Hwang et al, 2021). However, the underlying mechanisms for the high risk of HCC in patients with diabetes and obesity need further investigation.
It has been reported that the estimated total of infection‐attributable cancer is 17.8% of the global cancer burden, and HBV and HCV account for 4.9% (Parkin, 2006). HBV and HCV are the leading risk factors for HCC globally (El‐Serag, 2012; Teng et al, 2021). Around 54.4% of all liver cancer in the world is attributable to HBV (Parkin, 2006). A prospective study showed that persons with anti‐HCV positivity and anti‐HBV negativity have a 20‐fold increased risk of developing HCC (Sun et al, 2003). Moreover, a follow‐up study showed over 100‐fold increased risk of HCC in HBV or HCV carriers with both obesity and diabetes (Chen et al, 2008), and overweight is associated with an increased risk of HCC occurrence in patients with HCV (N'Kontchou et al, 2006). However, whether other viral infections may also contribute to the risk of HCC in patients with diabetes and obesity is yet to be elucidated.
Adeno‐associated virus (AAV) infection is around 30–80% in human populations (Erles et al, 1999; Halbert et al, 2006; Calcedo et al, 2009). However, no specific diseases have yet been associated with natural infection in most population studies, and AAV is usually regarded as nonpathogenic (Russell & Kay, 1999; Vasileva & Jessberger, 2005). Moreover, AAV vectors have broad tropism, low immunogenicity, rarely integrate into the host chromosome and can result in long‐term expression of the transgene (Russell & Kay, 1999; Li & Samulski, 2020). Therefore, AAVs are considered as promising vectors with the excellent safety profile for gene therapy applications, and even approved for clinical applications (Nathwani et al, 2014; Keeler & Flotte, 2019; Li & Samulski, 2020). Meanwhile, it has been reported that gene therapy with recombinant AAV (rAAV) frequently leads to impaired serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities (Nathwani et al, 2014; George et al, 2017; Mendell et al, 2017; Ozelo et al, 2022), and high dose of AAV even led to liver dysfunction and death of four patients (Philippidis, 2020, 2021). Newly, a Phase Ib trial of AAV gene therapy was placed on hold after the death of a young male participant (Philippidis, 2022). However, the underlying mechanisms leading to liver dysfunction and death are still unclear. Recently, a participant in a Phase 3 trial of AAV gene therapy developed hepatocellular carcinoma, although whether AAV contributed to this cancer's development needs further investigation (Kaiser, 2020). The safety of AAV was further challenged by the findings of AAV vector integration sites in mouse HCC after AAV injection (Donsante et al, 2007). Furthermore, a long‐term study of AAV gene therapy in dogs identified 1,741 unique AAV integration events in genomic DNA (Nguyen et al, 2021). It has also been reported that clonal integration of AAV in 11 of 193 HCCs, suggesting AAV is associated with oncogenic insertional mutagenesis in human HCC (Nault et al, 2015). Therefore, an association between AAV and HCC in the setting of therapeutic gene delivery has remained uncertain, and the mechanisms of AAV‐correlated development of HCC are still largely unknown (Valdmanis et al, 2012; Chandler et al, 2015). Moreover, whether rAAV injection in diabetic and obese models will lead to the development of HCC is still unclear.
In this study, we investigated the effect of rAAV injection in hyperglycemic and/or obese mice, and the potential protective role of prednisone. Liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and HCC were monitored in those mice. Moreover, Pebp1 was screened, and we investigated its role in inflammation and necroptosis in vivo and in vitro. Our data demonstrate that rAAV induces prednisone‐protectable liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and HCC in diabetic and obese mice via Pebp1 pathway.
Results
Injection of rAAV induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in db/db mice
To investigate whether rAAV injection will affect liver function and lead to the development of HCC in mice with diabetes and obesity, rAAV serotype 2/9 was constructed and injected into wild‐type and db/db male mice at the age of 9 weeks through tail vein (Fig 1A and B). The increased body weight, blood glucose levels, and serum ALT and AST activities in the diabetic and obese db/db mice were confirmed (Fig EV1A–D). Two months after a single injection of rAAV, wild‐type mice showed similar body weight, blood glucose levels, serum ALT and AST activities with the mice injected with PBS (Fig 1C–F). Injection of rAAV also had no noticeable effect on the hepatic morphology and histomorphology analyzed by H&E staining in wild‐type mice (Fig 1G). Meanwhile, db/db mice injected with rAAV showed similar body weight and blood glucose levels, but markedly increased serum ALT and AST activities compared with those injected with PBS (Fig 1H–K). Moreover, rAAV injection induced hepatic necrosis and death in db/db mice, and the incidence of necrosis and death was around 58 and 17%, respectively (Fig 1L).
To investigate whether the necrosis is necroptosis, phosphorylation of MLKL as a specific marker of necroptosis was detected (Pasparakis & Vandenabeele, 2015). The p‐MLKL level in necrotic area was dramatically increased compared with that in normal area (Fig 1M), which indicated that necroptosis was induced in livers of db/db mice after a single injection of rAAV for 2 months. Necroptosis is usually accompanied with inflammation (Newton & Manning, 2016); therefore, the hepatic mRNA levels of some key inflammatory factors were monitored. As expected, the mRNA levels of Il‐6, Il‐1β, Tnf‐α, and Mcp‐1 were significantly increased in necroptotic area compared with those in normal area (Fig 1N). To further investigate the effects of other serotypes of rAAV, rAAV serotype 2/8 was constructed and injected into db/db mice in the same manner. Two months after a single injection of rAAV serotype 2/8, liver injury and hepatic necroptosis were also observed in db/db mice (Fig EV2A–G). These data demonstrate that rAAV injection can lead to liver injury and necroptosis in db/db mice but not in wild‐type mice.
We next analyzed gene expression profiles of normal and necroptotic areas from livers of db/db mice after a single injection of PBS or rAAV for 2 months. In this and the following experiments, rAAV serotype 2/9 were used. The scatter plots of differentially expressed genes were shown in Fig 1O. The top 15 significantly enriched KEGG pathways of the differentially expressed genes between normal and necroptotic areas from mice injected with PBS and rAAV, respectively, were shown in Fig 1P. GSEA analysis of the enriched chemical carcinogenesis and cell cycle pathways related to carcinogenesis were shown in Fig EV3A and B, and the top 15 differentially expressed genes in these two enriched KEGG pathways were shown in Fig EV3C and D. To further investigate whether rAAV injection will lead to the development of HCC in db/db mice, the mice were analyzed after a single injection of rAAV or PBS for 6 months. The db/db mice injected with rAAV showed decreased body weight, similar blood glucose levels, and markedly increased serum ALT and AST activities compared with those injected with PBS (Fig 1Q–T). Furthermore, as expected, obvious liver tumors could be observed in around 54% of db/db mice after a single injection of rAAV for 6 months and around 8% of these mice died (Fig 1U). The hepatic carcinoma was confirmed by H&E staining and ki67 immunohistochemistry of liver sections (Fig 1U). Moreover, we analyzed gene expression profiles of HCC and adjacent areas from livers of db/db mice after a single injection of rAAV for 6 months. The scatter plots of differentially expressed genes were shown in Fig 1V. The top 15 significantly enriched KEGG pathways of the differentially expressed genes between HCC and adjacent areas were shown in Fig 1W. GSEA analysis of the enriched chemical carcinogenesis and ECM‐receptor interaction pathways related to carcinogenesis were shown in Fig EV3E and F, and the top 15 differentially expressed genes in these two enriched KEGG pathways were shown in Fig EV3G and H.
Taken together, these data demonstrate that injection of rAAV induces liver injury, necroptosis, and development of HCC in db/db mice but not in wild‐type mice.
Injection of rAAV induces liver injury, but not hepatic necroptosis, in mice with only hyperglycemia or obesity
To investigate whether rAAV injection induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in mice with only hyperglycemia, wild‐type mice were consecutively injected with 40 mg/kg/day streptozotocin intraperitoneally for 5 days to induce hyperglycemia. The schematic of the experimental design was shown in Fig 2A. Injection with streptozotocin led to a decrease in body weight and an obvious increase in blood glucose levels (Fig 2B and C). After a single injection of rAAV for 2 months, hyperglycemic mice induced by streptozotocin showed similar body weight, blood glucose levels, and hepatic glycogen content, but increased liver weight, serum ALT and AST activities, and apoptotic liver cells compared with those injected with PBS (Figs 2D–H, and EV4A and B). Hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that rAAV injection did not cause necroptosis in livers of streptozotocin‐induced hyperglycemic mice (Fig 2I). Moreover, there was no significant change of p‐MLKL level in livers of streptozotocin‐induced hyperglycemic mice after rAAV injection (Fig 2J).
To investigate whether rAAV injection induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis and carcinoma in mice with obesity and euglycemia, resistance to HFD‐induced hyperglycemia (RHH) mice were fed with high‐fat diet (HFD) to induce obesity. The schematic of the experimental design was shown in Fig 2K. Resistance to HFD‐induced hyperglycemia mice fed with HFD for 12 weeks showed significantly increased body weight and fat mass but normal blood glucose levels (Fig 2L–N). Two months after a single injection of rAAV, obese but euglycemic RHH mice showed similar body weight, liver weight and blood glucose levels, and significantly increased serum ALT and AST activities compared with those injected with PBS (Fig 2O–S). Hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that rAAV injection did not cause necroptosis in livers of the obese but euglycemic mice (Fig 2T). Moreover, there was no significant change of p‐MLKL level in livers of the obese but euglycemic mice after rAAV injection (Fig 2U).
Taken together, neither hyperglycemia nor obesity alone is sufficient for rAAV‐induced hepatic necroptosis in mice.
Injection of rAAV induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in HFD‐induced hyperglycemic and obese mice
To further investigate the contribution of hyperglycemia and obesity to the liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma induced by rAAV injection, wild‐type mice were fed with HFD to induce hyperglycemia and obesity. The schematic of the experimental design was shown in Fig 3A. Body weight, fat mass, and blood glucose levels were significantly increased in mice fed with HFD for 12 weeks (Fig 3B–D). Two months after a single injection of rAAV, hyperglycemic and obese mice induced by HFD showed similar body weight, liver weight, and blood glucose levels, but significantly increased serum ALT and AST activities compared with those injected with PBS (Fig 3E–I). Hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that rAAV injection led to hepatic necroptosis in hyperglycemic and obese mice induced by HFD (Fig 3J). Moreover, the protein level of p‐MLKL and the mRNA levels of some key inflammatory factors in necroptotic area were dramatically increased compared with those in normal area (Fig 3K and L).
To further investigate whether rAAV injection will lead to the development of HCC in hyperglycemic and obese mice induced by HFD, the mice were analyzed after a single injection of rAAV for 6 months. The mice injected with rAAV showed similar body weight and blood glucose levels, decreased liver weight, and increased serum ALT and AST activities compared with those injected with PBS (Fig 3M–Q). Furthermore, as expected, obvious liver tumors could be observed in around 38% of the hyperglycemic and obese mice after a single injection of rAAV for 6 months (Fig 3R). The hepatic carcinoma was further confirmed by H&E staining and ki67 immunohistochemistry of liver sections (Fig 3R).
Taken together, rAAV injection induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in mice with both hyperglycemia and obesity.
Oral administration of prednisone significantly alleviates rAAV‐induced liver injury and hepatic necroptosis in db/db mice
It has been reported that asymptomatic increase in serum AST and/or ALT activities induced by gene therapy with AAV vector can be resolved with prednisone treatment (George et al, 2017; Mendell et al, 2017). To investigate whether prednisone can also attenuate liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma induced by rAAV injection in mice with hyperglycemia and obesity, we first investigated whether prednisone can alleviate inflammation and necroptosis in vitro. It has been reported that Poly(I:C) has been used to mimic virus infection in cell model to induce inflammation (Liu et al, 2019). As shown in Fig 4A, some inflammatory factors were dramatically induced by poly(I:C) in primary macrophages, which was markedly alleviated by prednisone. Then, we directly analyzed the effect of prednisone on necroptosis in a cell model induced by poly(I:C) and z‐VAD‐fmk (Pearson et al, 2017). Necroptosis induced by poly(I:C) and z‐VAD‐fmk in primary macrophages monitored by propidium iodide staining and p‐MLKL level was also significantly inhibited by prednisone (Fig 4B and C). Furthermore, we fed db/db mice with chow diet containing prednisone for 2 months after a single injection of rAAV (Fig 4D). As shown in Fig 4E–I, prednisone treatment had no significant effect on body weight, liver weight, and blood glucose levels, but markedly decreased serum ALT and AST activities in db/db mice after a single injection of rAAV for 2 months. Moreover, prednisone administration dramatically inhibited hepatic necroptosis induced by rAAV injection when analyzed by morphological analysis, and the incidence of hepatic necroptosis was decreased from 83 to 33%; meanwhile, the death ratio was significantly decreased (Fig 4J and K). The effect of prednisone on hepatic necroptosis was further confirmed by H&E staining and immunoblot analysis of p‐MLKL level (Fig 4L and M). In addition, some inflammatory factors increased in necroptotic area were dramatically decreased by prednisone treatment (Fig 4N).
These data demonstrate that prednisone treatment protects db/db mice injected with rAAV from liver injury and hepatic necroptosis, and prednisone is likely to alleviate liver injury through blocking hepatic necroptosis.
Pebp1 mediates rAAV‐induced liver injury and hepatic necroptosis in db/db mice
To further investigate why hyperglycemic and obese mice are sensitive to rAAV injection, the gene expression profile of liver samples from wild‐type and db/db mice was analyzed. The scatter plot of differentially expressed genes was shown in Fig EV1E. The top 15 significantly enriched KEGG pathways of the differentially expressed genes were shown in Fig EV1F, and the top 15 genes upregulated in db/db mice were shown in Fig 5A. Among the top 15 genes upregulated in db/db mice, Cyp4a14 plays an important role in the development and progression of NAFLD (Zhang et al, 2017), Pebp1 is an inflammatory and immune system modulator (Lai et al, 2017; Gabriela‐Freitas et al, 2019), and Tat plays an important suppressive role in the development and progression of HCC (Fu et al, 2010). However, the effects of these three genes involved in different signaling pathways on diabetes or necroptosis are still largely unknown. The increase in Cyp4a14, Pebp1, and Tat were validated by qPCR and selected for further investigation (Fig 5B). The rAAV expressing siRNAs targeting these genes were injected via tail vein into db/db mice, and the schematic of the experimental design was shown in Fig 5C. Two months after a single injection of rAAV expressing the siRNAs, each group of db/db mice showed similar body weight, liver weight, and blood glucose levels (Fig 5D–F). Serum ALT and AST activities were significantly decreased in db/db mice injected with rAAV‐si‐Pebp1 compared with those injected with rAAV‐si‐NC, rAAV‐si‐Cyp4a14, or rAAV‐si‐Tat (Fig 5G and H). Similarly, hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that downregulation of Pebp1 markedly alleviated rAAV‐induced hepatic necroptosis from around 57% to around 17% in db/db mice, and the death ratio was significantly decreased (Fig 5I). The effect of these siRNAs was confirmed by qPCR (Fig 5J). Moreover, the levels of p‐MLKL and some inflammatory factors in necroptotic area were dramatically decreased by downregulation of Pebp1 (Fig 5K and L).
These data demonstrate that knockdown of Pebp1 prevents liver injury and hepatic necroptosis induced by rAAV injection in db/db mice.
Pebp1 mediates rAAV‐induced liver injury and hepatic necroptosis in HFD‐induced hyperglycemic and obese mice
To further confirm the role of Pebp1 in the development of liver injury and hepatic necroptosis after rAAV injection, HFD‐induced hyperglycemic and obese mice were injected with rAAV‐si‐NC or rAAV‐si‐Pebp1 (Fig 6A). As expected, after a single injection of rAAV for 2 months, all the mice showed similar body weight and blood glucose levels, while serum ALT and AST activities were significantly decreased in the mice injected with rAAV‐si‐Pebp1 compared with those injected with rAAV‐si‐NC (Fig 6B–E). The same mice with high ALT activity had high AST activity (Fig 6D and E), and 4 of the 5 mice with high ALT and AST activities showed hepatic necroptosis (Fig 6F). Both Pebp1 mRNA and protein levels were similar in the high ALT & AST subgroup and low ALT & AST subgroup (Fig EV4C and D). Hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that downregulation of Pebp1 significantly alleviates rAAV‐induced hepatic necroptosis in HFD‐induced hyperglycemic and obese mice (Fig 6F). In addition, the levels of p‐MLKL and some inflammatory factors increased in necroptotic area were dramatically decreased by downregulation of Pebp1 (Fig 6G and H).
The observations in db/db mice and HFD‐induced diabetic and obese mice show that Pebp1 mediates rAAV‐induced liver injury and hepatic necroptosis in hyperglycemic and obese mice.
Inhibition of Pebp1 pathway can attenuate inflammation and necroptosis
To investigate the role of Pebp1 in necroptosis pathway, we first analyzed the role of Pebp1 in inflammation. Poly(I:C) was used to mimic virus infection in cell model to induce inflammation as described previously (Liu et al, 2019). As shown in Fig 7A, the downregulation of Pebp1 in mouse primary macrophages by siRNA was confirmed by qPCR, and knockdown of Pebp1 almost completely inhibited the increase of some inflammatory factors induced by poly(I:C) (Fig 7B). Then, we directly analyzed the role of Pebp1 in a necroptosis cell model induced by poly(I:C) and zVAD‐fmk. Necroptosis of macrophages monitored by propidium iodide staining and p‐MLKL level was significantly alleviated by downregulation of Pebp1 (Fig 7C and D). It has been reported that Pebp1 is essential for Tbk1 activation (Lai et al, 2017). As shown in Fig 7E, knockdown of Pebp1 suppressed the elevation of p‐Tbk1 induced by poly(I:C). Knockdown of Tbk1 alleviated the increase of some inflammatory factors induced by poly(I:C) (Fig 7F and G). Similarly, necroptosis of macrophages was significantly attenuated by downregulation of Tbk1 (Fig 7H and I). In addition, the role of PEBP1 and TBK1 in necroptosis pathway can also be observed in THP‐1 human macrophages (Fig EV5).
To investigate whether Tbk1 mediates rAAV‐induced liver injury and hepatic necroptosis, db/db mice were injected with rAAV‐si‐NC or rAAV‐si‐Tbk1 (Fig 7J). As expected, after a single injection of rAAV for 11 weeks, all the db/db mice showed similar body weight, liver weight, and blood glucose levels, while serum ALT and AST activities were significantly decreased in the mice injected with rAAV‐si‐Tbk1 compared with those injected with rAAV‐si‐NC (Fig 7K–O). Hepatic morphological and histomorphological analysis showed that downregulation of Tbk1 significantly alleviates rAAV‐induced liver necroptosis in db/db mice (Fig 7P). The downregulation of Tbk1 by siRNA was confirmed by qPCR (Fig 7Q). In addition, the levels of p‐MLKL and some inflammatory factors increased in necroptotic area were dramatically decreased by downregulation of Tbk1 (Fig 7R and S).
These evidences demonstrate that inhibition of Pebp1 pathway can also attenuate inflammation and necroptosis both in vitro and in vivo.
Discussion
In this study, we found that rAAV injection induces liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in diabetic and obese mice, but neither in normal mice nor in mice with only hyperglycemia or obesity. Similarly, it has been reported that diabetes and obesity are considered as important risk factors for HCC (Gallagher & LeRoith, 2015; Lega & Lipscombe, 2020). Moreover, AAV infection is around 30–80% in human population (Erles et al, 1999; Halbert et al, 2006; Calcedo et al, 2009). Combined with our observations, these findings demonstrate that AAV infection is most likely a vital cause leading to HCC in patients with diabetes and obesity. Chronic infection with HBV together with exposure to aflatoxin B1 and infection with HCV together with alcohol use are considered as the dominant risk factors for HCC (Llovet et al, 2003). Our findings suggest that AAV infection together with diabetes and obesity is an additional key risk factor for HCC. Early detection of AAV infection and serum ALT/AST activities in patients with diabetes and obesity is highly encouraged to evaluate the risk of HCC, and it is also highly recommended to prevent HCC by keeping serum ALT/AST activities within normal levels in patients with diabetes and obesity infected with AAV.
Here, we show that rAAV injection leads to liver injury, hepatic necroptosis, and carcinoma in diabetic and obese mice, suggesting that AAV gene therapy should be limited to patients without hyperglycemia and obesity. Similarly, tumorigenesis after rAAV injection in mice with mucopolysaccharidosis type VII disease or with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency was observed (Donsante et al, 2001; Bell et al, 2006), which also suggest that AAV gene therapy needs to be applied in patients without some specific diseases. In our study, we found that the death of mice with severe liver injury and hepatic necroptosis after rAAV injection for 4–6 weeks in db/db mice. Similarly, it has been reported that high dose of rAAV led to liver dysfunction and death of four patients with heavier weight and evidence of pre‐existing hepatobiliary disease (Philippidis, 2020, 2021; Shieh et al, 2020; Wilson & Flotte, 2020). Since a lot of clinical trials are ongoing (Wang et al, 2019), and clinical applications even have been approved, it has been recommended that patients with liver or kidney dysfunction needs to be excluded as an eligibility criteria for gene therapy (Miesbach et al, 2019). According to our findings, whether AAV gene therapy is applicable to patients with hyperglycemia and obesity should be carefully considered.
AAV gene therapy frequently lead to impaired serum AST and/or ALT activities, and which can be resolved with prednisone treatment (Nathwani et al, 2014; George et al, 2017; Mendell et al, 2017). Consistently, we also observed that the prednisone treatment attenuated the increase of AST and ALT activities induced by rAAV injection in db/db mice. Moreover, we found that prednisone also alleviated hepatic necroptosis induced by rAAV in db/db mice. It has been reported that glucocorticoids are crucial to various physiological processes including inflammation, and prednisone is a synthetic glucocorticoid routinely used in the clinic today for their anti‐inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects (Spies et al, 2011; Cain & Cidlowski, 2017). Meanwhile, inflammatory factors can induce necroptosis (Newton & Manning, 2016). Combined with our observations, prednisone might block necroptosis by inhibiting inflammation. All these findings show that inhibiting inflammation and necroptosis by prednisone is a promising way to prevent liver dysfunction and subsequent related diseases during AAV gene therapy.
It has been reported that Pebp1 is involved in antiviral innate immunity, and Pebp1 deficiency or knockdown of Pebp1 attenuates inflammatory response (Gu et al, 2016; Lai et al, 2017). Consistently, we also observed that knockdown of Pebp1 alleviated inflammation both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we found that knockdown of Pebp1 prevents necroptosis both in vitro and in vivo, and the downregulation of Pebp1 is likely to block necroptosis through inhibition of inflammation. Pebp1 is essential for Tbk1 activation (Lai et al, 2017), and we also found that knockdown of Tbk1 attenuated inflammation and necroptosis both in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide strong evidence that Pebp1 pathway is essential to necroptosis and targeting Pebp1 pathway is a potential promising strategy to alleviate necroptosis and related diseases.
Taken together, our findings provide strong evidence to consider AAV infection as a critical risk factor for HCC, especially for patients with diabetes and obesity. It should be carefully weighed whether AAV gene therapy is applicable to patients with hyperglycemia and obesity, and treatment with prednisone to alleviate inflammation and necroptosis is a promising strategy to attenuate the side effects during AAV gene therapy. We also identified Pebp1 as a key component in necroptotic pathway and a potential drug target to alleviate necroptosis and related diseases including the side effects of AAV gene therapy.
Materials and Methods
Animals
All animals were maintained and used in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ethics committee approval no. SIBS‐2017‐ZQW‐1, SINH‐2021‐ZQW‐1, SINH‐2022‐ZQW‐1). Male wild‐type C57BL/6J, db/db and RHH mice were purchased from the Shanghai Laboratory Animals Center (SLAC). The animals were housed in individual cages with free access to a regular chow diet and water in a room at 22 ± 1°C on a 12‐h light/dark cycle. The animals presented a healthy status, and male mice were used for all experiments.
Recombinant adeno‐associated virus (rAAV) construction and injection
For rAAV2/9 construction, a random sequence TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTAA without any predicted target gene, and the sequence CAGCCTTCCACTATGATATCCTCAA, GAGACAACTCAAGACTCCCATCTTA, CCCAGAATTTGAGAATGACGTGGAA and AGACTATACTAACGAGTTA targeting Cyp4a14, Pebp1, Tat and Tbk1 were synthesized and cloned into pHBAAV‐U6‐ZsGreen (Hanbio) to obtain pAAV‐U6‐si‐NC‐ZsGreen, pAAV‐U6‐si‐Cyp4a14‐ZsGreen, pAAV‐U6‐si‐Pebp1‐ZsGreen, pAAV‐U6‐si‐Tat‐ZsGreen and pAAV‐U6‐si‐Tbk1‐ZsGreen. These constructed plasmids were co‐transfected with pAAV‐RC (Hanbio) and pHelper (Hanbio) respectively into HEK293T cells to generate rAAV‐si‐NC, rAAV‐si‐Cyp4a14, rAAV‐si‐Pebp1, rAAV‐si‐Tat and rAAV‐si‐Tbk1. Except indicated, rAAV‐si‐NC was mentioned as rAAV and used to study the effect of rAAV. For rAAV2/8 construction, the pAAV‐GFP plasmid (Cell Biolabs) was co‐transfected with packaging plasmid pHelper and pAAV‐8 (Cell Biolabs) into HEK293T cells to generate rAAV2/8. The virus was concentrated by density gradient centrifugation with iodixanol (Sigma, 1343517). Titers of the virus were measured by qPCR with vector‐specific primers GTGCACTGTGTTTGCTGACG and GAAAGGAGCTGACAGGTGGT. The viruses were diluted with PBS and administered at a dose of 1 × 1011 vg/mouse through tail vein injection with a volume of 200 μl.
Blood and serum analysis
Blood glucose levels were measured at the indicated time points using tail or heart blood using the FreeStyle blood glucose monitoring system (TheraSense). Serum aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase were determined using enzymatic assay kits (ShenSuo Unf Medical Diagnostics Articles Co.).
Histological analysis of liver
Liver tissues were excised and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 24 h and then dehydrated in PBS containing 30% sucrose for at least 16 h. Following paraffin embedding, the tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously with modifications (Wu et al, 2011). Briefly, sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated. Heat‐induced epitope retrieval was performed by placing slides immersed in sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 100°C for 20 min followed by endogenous peroxidase blocking with 3% H2O2 for 30 min. Blocking was performed with 2% (w/v) BSA, and then the sections were incubated with Ki67 antibody (CST, 9449, 1:400) at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)‐conjugated goat anti‐mouse antibody for 2 h at room temperature, and then stained by diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Gene Tech, GK500710). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Immunoblotting
Equal volume of cell or liver lysates at the same protein concentrations with a total amount of 20–40 μg protein were separated by SDS–PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck Millipore), blocked and detected with antibodies against mouse p‐MLKL (S345; Abcam, Ab196436, 1:1,000), mouse MLKL (CST, 37705, 1:1,000), human p‐MLKL (S358; Abcam, Ab187091, 1:1,000), human MLKL (Abcam, Ab184718, 1:1,000), PEBP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc‐376925, 1:2,000), p‐TBK1 (CST, 5483, 1:1,000), TBK1 (CST, 38066, 1:1,000), cleaved Caspase‐3 (CST, 9661, 1:1,000), Caspase‐3 (CST, 9662, 1:1,000), cleaved Caspase‐8 (CST, 9429, 1:1,000), Caspase‐8 (CST, 4927, 1:1,000), and GAPDH (CST, 2118, 1:5,000). The immune complexes were detected using a horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibody and visualized with a chemiluminescence reagent (Thermo). Protein quantification was analyzed by PhotoShop, and normalized to GAPDH.
RNA isolation and quantitative PCR
Total RNA extracted with TRIzol reagent was reverse transcribed using M‐MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) with random hexamer primers. Quantitative PCR was performed using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) on an ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System. The primers GTGCCGCCTGGAGAAACCT and TGAAGTCGCAGGAGACAACC were used to detect mouse Gapdh; CCCAACTGGTACATCAGCAC and TCTGCTCATTCACGAAAAGG for mouse Il‐1β; CCCACTCTGACCCCTTTACT and TTTGAGTCCTTGATGGTGGT for mouse Tnf‐α; CGGAGAGGAGACTTCACAGA and CCAGTTTGGTAGCATCCATC for mouse Il‐6; TTAAAAACCTGGATCGGAACCAA and GCATTAGCTTCAGATTTACGGGT for mouse Mcp‐1; TGAATTGCTGCCAGATCCCAC and GTTCAGTGGCTGGTCAGAGTT for mouse Cyp4a14; ATAGACCCACCAGCATTTCGT and GTAAACCAGCCAGACATAGCG for mouse Pebp1; ACCTTCAATCCCATCCGA and TCCCGACTGGATAGGTAG for mouse Tat; TATCTTTGTCACGAGCCGGG and AACCAGTTCAACCAGCCACC for mouse Tbk1. The gene expression levels were normalized to mouse Gapdh. The primers GCGAGAAGATGACCCAGATCAT and GCTCAGGAGGAGCAATGATCTT were used to detect human ACTB; AGATGATAAGCCCACTCTACAGC and CTTTAAGTGAGTAGGAGAGGTGAG for human IL‐1β; AGATGATCTGACTGCCTGGG and CTGCTGCACTTTGGAGTGAT for human TNF‐α; GGTACATCCTCGACGGCATCT and GTGCCTCTTTGCTGCTTTCAC for human IL‐6; CAGCCAGATGCAATCAATGCC and TGGAATCCTGAACCCACTTCT for human MCP‐1; CTACACCTTGGTCCTGACAGA and GAGCCCACATAATCGGAGAGG for human PEBP1; TTGCAGTCTTTCTCGGGGTC and ACTGGTCAAAACCCCAACACT for human TBK1. The gene expression levels were normalized to human ACTB.
Streptozotocin‐induced hyperglycemia mouse model
Male wild‐type mice were injected intraperitoneally with 40 mg/kg/day STZ (Sigma‐Aldrich) or an equivalent volume of vehicle for 5 consecutive days at the age of 9‐week‐old as described previously (Cheng et al, 2019). The mice with a blood glucose level > 13.8 mM were used for the following experiments.
Measurement of hepatic glycogen content
Hepatic glycogen content was measured using a glycogen content assay kit (Sangon Biotech).
HFD‐induced obesity mouse model
Five‐week‐old wild‐type mice were randomly assigned and fed with either normal chow diet containing 10 kcal% fat or high‐fat diet containing 40 kcal% fat and 40 kcal% sucrose (Research Diets D12327). Fat mass was measured in conscious animals by a minispec mq serial NMR spectrometer (Bruker). After fed with high‐fat diet for 12 weeks, the mice with a fat mass percentage > 30% and a blood glucose level > 13.8 mM were considered both hyperglycemia and obesity, and used for the following experiments. Injection with PBS, AAV‐si‐NC or AAV‐si‐Pebp1 was performed simultaneously in these hyperglycemic and obese mice. Five‐week‐old RHH mice were randomly assigned and fed with either normal chow containing 10 kcal% fat or high‐fat diet containing 60 kcal% fat (Research Diets). After fed for 12 weeks, the mice with a fat mass percentage > 30% were considered obesity.
Oral administration of prednisone
The chow diet was ground and mixed with the powder of prednisone at the indicated concentrations, and then was pelleted for the following studies. The db/db mice at the age of 9 weeks were injected with AAV at a dose of 1 × 1011 vg/mouse and randomly assigned to feed a chow diet without or with 4.3 mg/kg/day prednisone for 2 months. The liver function of the mice was monitored by measurement of serum aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase.
High‐throughput RNA‐Sequencing (RNA‐Seq)
Liver samples were used to extract total RNA for the following RNA‐Seq. Completed libraries were generated and sequenced with 150‐bp paired‐end reads on Illumina HiSeq 4000. The top 15 hepatic genes upregulated in 9‐week‐old db/db mice compared with wild‐type mice ranked by adjusted P‐value with fold change > 3 and rpm > 100 in wild‐type mice were selected for the following analysis. Genes having adjusted P‐value ≤ 0.05 and abs (log2 (fold change)) ≥ 1 were considered as differentially expressed. The differentially expressed genes were further analyzed by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis).
Mouse peritoneal macrophage isolation, culture, and treatment
Mouse peritoneal macrophages were obtained from male wild‐type mice at the age of 6–8 weeks as described previously (Zhao et al, 2017). Briefly, mice were intraperitoneally injected with 2–3 ml 5% dehydrated thioglycolate medium (BBL) in PBS. After 3–4 days, the mice were killed, and 3–4 ml of RPMI 1640 medium was injected intraperitoneally. The mice were gently rubbed on the abdomen to make the medium flow well in the abdomen, and then an incision was made on the abdomen, and the liquid was aspirated from the abdomen with a 5‐ml syringe. After precipitation by centrifugation, washing and counting, peritoneal macrophages were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS at 37°C with 5% CO2. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were treated by 20 μg/ml poly(I:C) (Sigma) with or without 20 μM z‐VAD‐fmk (MCE) for 8 h, then used for RNA isolation, propidium iodide staining or immunoblotting. For treatment with prednisone, cells were treated with 40 μM prednisone (MCE) for 1 h, then 20 μg/ml poly(I:C) with or without 20 μM z‐VAD‐fmk were added and incubated for 3 h. Subsequently, additional 40 μM prednisone was supplemented to compensate its degradation. The cells were harvested for immunoblotting after treatment with poly(I:C) and z‐VAD‐fmk for 6 h, and used for RNA isolation and propidium iodide staining after treatment with poly(I:C) with or without z‐VAD‐fmk for 8 h.
Human THP‐1 cell culture and treatment
THP‐1 human monocytes were obtained from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences and were tested about monthly for mycoplasma contamination. THP‐1 monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS and 50 μM β‐mercaptoethanol at 37°C with 5% CO2, and treated with 100 ng/ml phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (PMA; Sigma) for 24 h to induce the differentiation to macrophages. After culture in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS for another 24 h, the THP‐1 macrophages were transfected with the indicated siRNAs. After transfected with siRNAs for 48 h, the cells were treated with 40 μg/ml poly(I:C) for 8 h to isolate RNA or treated with 40 μg/ml poly(I:C) and 40 μM z‐VAD‐fmk for 24 h for propidium iodide staining or immunoblotting.
Transfection of siRNAs
Mouse peritoneal macrophages were transfected with si‐NC (sense: 5′‐UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUAAdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐UUACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT‐3′) or si‐Pebp1 (sense: 5′‐GAGACAACUCAAGACUCCCAUCUUAdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐UAAGAUGGGAGUCUUGAGUUGUCUCdTdT‐3′) or si‐Tbk1 (sense: 5′‐AGACUAUACUAACGAGUUAdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐UAACUCGUUAGUAUAGUAUdTdT‐3′) Human THP‐1 cells were transfected with si‐NC (sense: 5′‐UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUAAdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐UUACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT‐3′) or si‐PEBP1 (sense: 5′‐UGGUCAACAUGAAGGGUAAdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐UUACCCUUCAUGUUGACCAdTdT‐3′) or si‐TBK1 (sense: 5′‐CCUCUGAAUACCAUAGGAUdTdT‐3′, antisense: 5′‐AUCCUAUGGUAUUCAGAGGdTdT‐3′). All the siRNAs were transfected at a dose of 50 nM using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After transfection for 36 h for mouse macrophages or 48 h for human macrophages, cells were treated as indicated and harvested for RNA isolation. After transfection for 48 h, cells were treated as indicated for propidium iodide staining and immunoblotting.
Propidium iodide staining
Cells were stained with 5 μg/ml propidium iodide (Beyotime Biotech) in PBS for 5–10 min and visualized under a fluorescent microscope.
Statistics
Animals were randomized into different treatment groups. No mice were excluded from all the experiments. Propidium iodide positive cells were counted blindly.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Author contributions
Yalan Cheng: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; validation; investigation; visualization; methodology; writing – original draft; project administration; writing – review and editing. Zhentong Zhang: Data curation; formal analysis; validation; investigation; visualization; methodology; project administration; writing – review and editing. Peidong Gao: Formal analysis; investigation; writing – review and editing. Hejin Lai: Software; formal analysis; writing – review and editing. Wuling Zhong: Investigation; writing – review and editing. Ning Feng: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Yale Yang: Investigation; writing – review and editing. Huimin Yu: Investigation; writing – review and editing. Yali Zhang: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Yumo Han: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Jieya Dong: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Zhishui He: Formal analysis; investigation; writing – review and editing. Rui Huang: Investigation; methodology; writing – review and editing. Qiwei Zhai: Conceptualization; resources; formal analysis; supervision; funding acquisition; investigation; visualization; writing – review and editing.
Disclosure and competing interests statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0800603), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32200969, 31630037, 91740103, 91940306), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB19030103), Frontier Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Research Projects (QYZDJ‐SSW‐SMC022), Shanghai Leading Talents Program, Shanghai Post‐doctoral Excellence Program and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M661658). We would like to thank Yifan Bu, Zhonghui Weng and Aimin Huang from the Institutional Center for Shared Technologies and Facilities of SINH, CAS for technical assistance.
EMBO Mol Med (2023) 15: e17230
Data availability
The RNA‐sequencing data generated and/or analyzed during this study are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive repository (accession number PRJNA762256 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA762256), PRJNA867031 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA867031)).
References
- Bell P, Moscioni AD, McCarter RJ, Wu D, Gao GP, Hoang A, Sanmiguel JC, Sun X, Wivel NA, Raper SE et al (2006) Analysis of tumors arising in male B6C3F1 mice with and without AAV vector delivery to liver. Mol Ther 14: 34–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cain DW, Cidlowski JA (2017) Immune regulation by glucocorticoids. Nat Rev Immunol 17: 233–247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calcedo R, Vandenberghe LH, Gao G, Lin J, Wilson JM (2009) Worldwide epidemiology of neutralizing antibodies to adeno‐associated viruses. J Infect Dis 199: 381–390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandler RJ, LaFave MC, Varshney GK, Trivedi NS, Carrillo‐Carrasco N, Senac JS, Wu W, Hoffmann V, Elkahloun AG, Burgess SM et al (2015) Vector design influences hepatic genotoxicity after adeno‐associated virus gene therapy. J Clin Invest 125: 870–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen CL, Yang HI, Yang WS, Liu CJ, Chen PJ, You SL, Wang LY, Sun CA, Lu SN, Chen DS et al (2008) Metabolic factors and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by chronic hepatitis B/C infection: a follow‐up study in Taiwan. Gastroenterology 135: 111–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng Y, Liu J, Luan Y, Liu Z, Lai H, Zhong W, Yang Y, Yu H, Feng N, Wang H et al (2019) Sarm1 gene deficiency attenuates diabetic peripheral neuropathy in mice. Diabetes 68: 2120–2130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donsante A, Vogler C, Muzyczka N, Crawford JM, Barker J, Flotte T, Campbell‐Thompson M, Daly T, Sands MS (2001) Observed incidence of tumorigenesis in long‐term rodent studies of rAAV vectors. Gene Ther 8: 1343–1346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donsante A, Miller DG, Li Y, Vogler C, Brunt EM, Russell DW, Sands MS (2007) AAV vector integration sites in mouse hepatocellular carcinoma. Science 317: 477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El‐Serag HB (2012) Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 142: 1264–1273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erles K, Sebokova P, Schlehofer JR (1999) Update on the prevalence of serum antibodies (IgG and IgM) to adeno‐associated virus (AAV). J Med Virol 59: 406–411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu L, Dong SS, Xie YW, Tai LS, Chen L, Kong KL, Man K, Xie D, Li Y, Cheng Y et al (2010) Down‐regulation of tyrosine aminotransferase at a frequently deleted region 16q22 contributes to the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 51: 1624–1634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gabriela‐Freitas M, Pinheiro J, Raquel‐Cunha A, Cardoso‐Carneiro D, Martinho O (2019) RKIP as an inflammatory and immune system modulator: implications in cancer. Biomolecules 9: 769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D (2015) Obesity and diabetes: the increased risk of cancer and cancer‐related mortality. Physiol Rev 95: 727–748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George LA, Sullivan SK, Giermasz A, Rasko JEJ, Samelson‐Jones BJ, Ducore J, Cuker A, Sullivan LM, Majumdar S, Teitel J et al (2017) Hemophilia B gene therapy with a High‐specific‐activity factor IX variant. N Engl J Med 377: 2215–2227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu M, Liu Z, Lai R, Liu S, Lin W, Ouyang C, Ye S, Huang H, Wang X (2016) RKIP and TBK1 form a positive feedback loop to promote type I interferon production in innate immunity. EMBO J 35: 2553–2565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halbert CL, Miller AD, McNamara S, Emerson J, Gibson RL, Ramsey B, Aitken ML (2006) Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies against adeno‐associated virus (AAV) types 2, 5, and 6 in cystic fibrosis and normal populations: implications for gene therapy using AAV vectors. Hum Gene Ther 17: 440–447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang S, Park YM, Han KD, Yun JS, Ko SH, Ahn YB, Han JH (2021) Associations of general obesity and central obesity with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a Korean population: a national population‐based cohort study. Int J Cancer 148: 1144–1154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser J (2020) How safe is a popular gene therapy vector? Science 367: 131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeler AM, Flotte TR (2019) Recombinant adeno‐associated virus gene therapy in light of Luxturna (and Zolgensma and Glybera): where are we, and how did we get here? Annu Rev Virol 6: 601–621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koh WP, Wang R, Jin A, Yu MC, Yuan JM (2013) Diabetes mellitus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: findings from the Singapore Chinese health study. Br J Cancer 108: 1182–1188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- La Vecchia C, Negri E, Decarli A, Franceschi S (1997) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of primary liver cancer. Int J Cancer 73: 204–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lai R, Gu M, Jiang W, Lin W, Xu P, Liu Z, Huang H, An H, Wang X (2017) Raf kinase inhibitor protein preferentially promotes TLR3‐triggered signaling and inflammation. J Immunol 198: 4086–4095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lega IC, Lipscombe LL (2020) Review: diabetes, obesity, and cancer‐pathophysiology and clinical implications. Endocr Rev 41: 33–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li C, Samulski RJ (2020) Engineering adeno‐associated virus vectors for gene therapy. Nat Rev Genet 21: 255–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu CX, Li X, Nan F, Jiang S, Gao X, Guo SK, Xue W, Cui Y, Dong K, Ding H et al (2019) Structure and degradation of circular RNAs regulate PKR activation in innate immunity. Cell 177: 865–880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 362: 1907–1917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mantovani A, Targher G (2017) Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: spotlight on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Transl Med 5: 270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marengo A, Rosso C, Bugianesi E (2016) Liver cancer: connections with obesity, fatty liver, and cirrhosis. Annu Rev Med 67: 103–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mendell JR, Al‐Zaidy S, Shell R, Arnold WD, Rodino‐Klapac LR, Prior TW, Lowes L, Alfano L, Berry K, Church K et al (2017) Single‐dose gene‐replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med 377: 1713–1722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miesbach W, O'Mahony B, Key NS, Makris M (2019) How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective. Haemophilia 25: 545–557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nathwani AC, Reiss UM, Tuddenham EG, Rosales C, Chowdary P, McIntosh J, Della Peruta M, Lheriteau E, Patel N, Raj D et al (2014) Long‐term safety and efficacy of factor IX gene therapy in hemophilia B. N Engl J Med 371: 1994–2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nault JC, Datta S, Imbeaud S, Franconi A, Mallet M, Couchy G, Letouze E, Pilati C, Verret B, Blanc JF et al (2015) Recurrent AAV2‐related insertional mutagenesis in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Nat Genet 47: 1187–1193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton K, Manning G (2016) Necroptosis and inflammation. Annu Rev Biochem 85: 743–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen GN, Everett JK, Kafle S, Roche AM, Raymond HE, Leiby J, Wood C, Assenmacher CA, Merricks EP, Long CT et al (2021) A long‐term study of AAV gene therapy in dogs with hemophilia a identifies clonal expansions of transduced liver cells. Nat Biotechnol 39: 47–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- N'Kontchou G, Paries J, Htar MT, Ganne‐Carrie N, Costentin L, Grando‐Lemaire V, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M (2006) Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcoholic or viral C cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4: 1062–1068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozelo MC, Mahlangu J, Pasi KJ, Giermasz A, Leavitt AD, Laffan M, Symington E, Quon DV, Wang JD, Peerlinck K et al (2022) Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 386: 1013–1025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkin DM (2006) The global health burden of infection‐associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 118: 3030–3044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pasparakis M, Vandenabeele P (2015) Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature 517: 311–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson JS, Giogha C, Muhlen S, Nachbur U, Pham CL, Zhang Y, Hildebrand JM, Oates CV, Lung TW, Ingle D et al (2017) EspL is a bacterial cysteine protease effector that cleaves RHIM proteins to block necroptosis and inflammation. Nat Microbiol 2: 16258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philippidis A (2020) After third death, Audentes' AT132 remains on clinical hold. Hum Gene Ther 31: 908–910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philippidis A (2021) Fourth boy dies in clinical trial of Astellas' AT132. Hum Gene Ther 32: 1008–1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philippidis A (2022) After patient death, FDA places hold on Pfizer Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy trial. Hum Gene Ther 33: 111–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plaz Torres MC, Jaffe A, Perry R, Marabotto E, Strazzabosco M, Giannini EG (2022) Diabetes medications and risk of HCC. Hepatology 76: 1880–1897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell DW, Kay MA (1999) Adeno‐associated virus vectors and hematology. Blood 94: 864–874 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samanic C, Chow WH, Gridley G, Jarvholm B, Fraumeni JF Jr (2006) Relation of body mass index to cancer risk in 362,552 Swedish men. Cancer Causes Control 17: 901–909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlesinger S, Aleksandrova K, Pischon T, Fedirko V, Jenab M, Trepo E, Boffetta P, Dahm C, Overvad K, Tjønneland A et al (2013) Abdominal obesity, weight gain during adulthood and risk of liver and biliary tract cancer in a European cohort. Int J Cancer 132: 645–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shieh PB, Bonnemann CG, Muller‐Felber W, Blaschek A, Dowling JJ, Kuntz NL, Seferian AM (2020) Re: “moving forward after two deaths in a gene therapy trial of Myotubular myopathy” by Wilson and Flotte. Hum Gene Ther 31: 787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spies CM, Cutolo M, Straub RH, Burmester GR, Buttgereit F (2011) Prednisone chronotherapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 29: S42–S45 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun CA, Wu DM, Lin CC, Lu SN, You SL, Wang LY, Wu MH, Chen CJ (2003) Incidence and cofactors of hepatitis C virus‐related hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of 12,008 men in Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol 157: 674–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teng W, Liu YC, Jeng WJ, Su CW (2021) Tertiary prevention of HCC in chronic hepatitis B or C infected patients. Cancer 13: 1729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valdmanis PN, Lisowski L, Kay MA (2012) rAAV‐mediated tumorigenesis: still unresolved after an AAV assault. Mol Ther 20: 2014–2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasileva A, Jessberger R (2005) Precise hit: adeno‐associated virus in gene targeting. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 837–847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang D, Tai PWL, Gao GP (2019) Adeno‐associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18: 358–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson JM, Flotte TR (2020) Moving forward after two deaths in a gene therapy trial of Myotubular myopathy. Hum Gene Ther 31: 695–696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J, Zhang F, Yan M, Wu D, Yu Q, Zhang Y, Zhou B, McBurney MW, Zhai Q (2011) WldS enhances insulin transcription and secretion via a SIRT1‐dependent pathway and improves glucose homeostasis. Diabetes 60: 3197–3207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X, Li S, Zhou Y, Su W, Ruan X, Wang B, Zheng F, Warner M, Gustafsson JA, Guan Y (2017) Ablation of cytochrome P450 omega‐hydroxylase 4A14 gene attenuates hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114: 3181–3185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Q, Yu X, Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhang X, Wu X, Xie Q, Li M, Ying H, Zhang H (2017) RIPK3 mediates necroptosis during embryonic development and postnatal inflammation in Fadd‐deficient mice. Cell Rep 19: 798–808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]