. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 10.

Published in final edited form as: Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jul 14;41(10):1206–1211. doi: 10.1177/1071100720937013

Table 2:

Association between patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction scores

Satisfaction Outcome	PROMIS Predictor	Score Ratio (95% CI)*	P-Value*
l00-Overall Satisfaction	PROMIS Physical Function	0.82 (0.68–0.99)	0.039
l00-Overall Satisfaction	PROMIS Pain Interference	1.15 (0.94–1.40)	0.18
100-Satisfaction with Care Provider	PROMIS Physical Function	0.60 (0.40–0.92)	0.019
100-Satisfaction with Care Provider	PROMIS Pain Interference	1.46 (0.96–2.19)	0.08

Results are presented from multivariate regression analyses comparing either overall satisfaction or satisfaction with care provider to either PROMIS outcome score, adjusting for age, sex, provider, and insurance status. Separate analyses were run for PROMIS physical function and PROMIS pain interference. Data are displayed as score ratios based on 10-point increases in each respective PROMIS score. To clarify for PROMIS physical function, lower scores mean greater functional impairment whereas with PROMIS pain interference, higher scores equate to more pain.