Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;2016(3):CD004179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004179.pub2

Summary of findings 6. DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair.

DOAC compared to heparin for people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
Patient or population: people requiring prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair
 Setting: hospital and outpatient setting
 Intervention: DOAC
 Comparison: heparin
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Number of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with heparin Risk with DOAC
Symptomatic VTE (DVT and PE)
 Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days Study population OR 0.70
 (0.28 to 1.70) 15977
 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1 2
4 per 1000 3 per 1000
 (1 to 8)
Symptomatic DVT (proximal or distal)
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days
Study population OR 0.60
 (0.11 to 3.27) 15977
 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 2 3
3 per 1000 2 per 1000
 (0 to 9)
Symptomatic PE
 Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days Study population OR 0.91
 (0.43 to 1.94) 14731
 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 MODERATE 2
2 per 1000 2 per 1000
 (1 to 4)
Bleeding ‐ major
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days
Study population OR 1.11
 (0.79 to 1.54) 16199
 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 HIGH
8 per 1000 9 per 1000
 (7 to 13)
Bleeding ‐ clinically relevant, non‐major
 Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days Study population OR 1.08
 (0.90 to 1.28) 15241
 (4 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 HIGH
33 per 1000 36 per 1000
 (30 to 42)
Bleeding ‐ minor
Treatment duration 28 ‐ 42 days
Study population OR 0.95
 (0.82 to 1.10) 11766
 (4 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕
 HIGH
66 per 1000 63 per 1000
 (55 to 72)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; DOAC: direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: deep vein thrombosis; OR: odds ratio; PE: pulmonary embolism; RCT: randomised controlled trial; VTE: venous thromboembolism
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded by one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 55%)
 2 Downgraded by one level for imprecision due to low number of events leading to wide CI
 3 Downgraded by one level for inconsistency (heterogeneity, I2 = 65%)