Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 28;15(3):155–170. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155

Table 9. Means and standard deviations of axial internal gap (Comparison of processing devices by design software, µm, n = 40).

Processing Devices
Aegis HM Trione Z Motion 2
Design Software EZIS 100.31 ± 65.03a,b 97.20 ± 66.79d,e 99.49 ± 69.05f,g
3Shape 53.12 ± 43.84a,c 54.13 ± 45.69d 51.12 ± 49.58f
Exocad 41.26 ± 33.81b,c 54.61 ± 45.64e 48.49 ± 52.28g

a, b, c, d, e, f, gSame lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P < .017 in a column.