Abstract
Accurate localization of the site(s) of active disease is key to informing decision-making in the management of refractory pituitary adenomas when autonomous hormone secretion and/or continued tumor growth challenge conventional therapeutic approaches. In this context, the use of non-standard MR sequences, alternative post-acquisition image processing, or molecular (functional) imaging may provide valuable additional information to inform patient management.
Keywords: Refractory pituitary adenoma, MRI, Molecular / functional imaging, PET, Radiomics
Introduction
Most pituitary adenomas (PA) respond to one or more conventional treatment options (e.g. medical therapy, surgery, radiotherapy) or can be managed with expectant surveillance [1]. However, some PA are refractory to standard treatment and require alternative therapeutic approaches. Refractory tumor behavior can be considered in two domains which may co-exist: (i) ‘biochemical refractoriness’ (i.e. persistent autonomous hormone production with associated clinical sequelae); (ii) ‘structural refractoriness’ [where there is continued growth (or failure to regress) with local mass effect].
Individual patient characteristics, comorbidities, genetic context, degree of endocrine dysfunction, and intraoperative and pathological findings all contribute to the decision-making process in such cases. However, in many patients imaging remains the major determinant of whether surgery and/or radiotherapy can be offered.
Standard MR sequences [coronal and sagittal T1-weighted (T1) spin echo (SE) pre- and post-gadolinium, and coronal T2-weighted (T2) fast/turbo spin echo (FSE/TSE)] provide sufficient information to guide treatment decisions in most patients [2]. However, in an important subgroup, including some refractory PA, conventional imaging is indeterminate and this may hinder optimal management.
Additional approaches to imaging in refractory disease
To address this shortfall, several groups have explored different anatomical and molecular imaging approaches.
Anatomical imaging
Residual tumor is most likely to localize to sites of known disease and subtle changes may only be appreciated retrospectively on review of serial imaging by a specialist multidisciplinary team.
Higher field strength MRI [3 or 7 Tesla (3T/7T)] and more advanced volumetric sequences such as 3D gradient echo (GE; e.g. spoiled and ultra-fast GE) and 3D FSE sequences may be useful for detecting small volume recurrence due to superior resolution and improved signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. Volumetric acquisition provides improved soft tissue contrast and aids discrimination between residual adenoma, postoperative tissue remodeling and normal gland, and allows high resolution formats in any plane to guide surgery or radiotherapy planning.
Depending on the clinical question at hand, other MR sequences can be considered: [3]
-
Enhanced visualization of cavernous sinus structures
- Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) uses gadolinium-based contrast agents and rapid 3D T1 spoiled GE sequences to provide enhanced delineation of intracavernous arterial anatomy.
- High contrast and resolution T2 GE sequences (e.g. CISS) provide improved delineation of cranial nerves and the normal structure of the cavernous sinus [4].
-
Improved delineation of visual pathways
- High contrast and resolution T2 GE sequences (e.g. FIESTA) aid localization of the anterior visual pathways within the suprasellar cistern; higher signal intensity may predict persistent visual deficit [5].
- Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which uses anisotropic diffusion to estimate axonal organization, may identify edema and microstructural damage within the anterior visual pathways.
-
Preoperative assessment of tumor consistency
- Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) uses the propagation of shear waves to generate quantitative maps of tissue stiffness.
- The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), may also predict tumor consistency.
-
Prediction of treatment outcome
- Although not widely employed, there is some evidence that metabolite peaks demonstrated on magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can predict the proliferative (and haemorrhagic) potential of pituitary adenomas and response to somatostatin receptor ligands in growth-hormone secreting adenomas.
MR-based radiomics
Radiomics is the post-acquisition extraction and analysis of quantitative features from imaging datasets by means of advanced mathematical processing. It has been proposed as an adjunctive tool for characterizing and predicting the behavior of PA. Radiomic signatures from MR sequences have been shown to correlate with tumor invasiveness, pathological features (e.g. granulation pattern, Ki-67 index, transcription factor expression) and treatment responsiveness in certain tumor subtypes [6]. It may also provide an indication of the likelihood of recurrence after surgical resection [7]. Together, these preliminary findings indicate that radiomics could play a role in the identification of likely refractory PA, thereby supporting decision-making by the pituitary multidisciplinary team.
Molecular (PET) imaging
Although an array of radiotracers have been used to image pituitary tumors, those targeting the amino acid transporter LAT1 [e.g. 11 C-methionine (11 C-Met); 18 F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18 F-FET)] or tumoral somatostatin receptor expression (e.g. 68Ga-DOTATATE) appear to have the greatest utility in clinical practice [8]. Coregistration of PET/CT with volumetric MRI (PET/MRCR), or use of hybrid PET/MR, enables precise localization of sites of abnormal tracer uptake.
Potential applications of molecular imaging in refractory PA
Tumor localization to facilitate targeted intervention in medically refractory disease.
MRI does not always confidently identify site(s) of small volume residual/recurrent PA, or distinguish active tumor from post-treatment remodeling. Molecular imaging can facilitate precise localization of functioning tumor to guide targeted neurosurgical resection and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (Fig. 1A–B) [9–11].
-
2)
Prediction of response to therapy.
Radiotracers targeting dopaminergic (D2) receptors (e.g. 11 C-raclopride; 18 F-fallypride) may predict future responsiveness of prolactinomas and non-functioning pituitary adenomas to dopamine agonists, thereby facilitating more timely identification of tumors that are likely to be refractory to medical therapy, and allowing other treatment modalities to be considered at an earlier stage [12, 13].
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), typically delivered using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands (e.g. 177Lu-DOTATATE), may be considered in the management of aggressive pituitary adenomas that have proved resistant to other treatment modalities; in this setting, molecular imaging using 68Ga-DOTATATE can be used to assess potential suitability for treatment [14, 15].
-
3)
Confirmation of boundaries/extent of anatomically complex disease.
PA may invade local structures and extend beyond the sella, with consequences for surgical resection and radiotherapy planning. Failure to appreciate the full extent of tumor extension/invasion can lead to unanticipated non-curative intervention, creating the erroneous impression of a tumor that is refractory to standard treatment. This is particularly challenging in patients with lateral (cavernous sinus) [16] and inferior (sphenoid/clival) [17] extension where MRI appearances may appear discordant with intraoperative findings, which can be further exacerbated in the post-surgical setting. Optimized imaging with PET may reveal the true extent of tumor, thereby improving the efficacy of targeted interventions (e.g. surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) and avoiding the misclassification of an adenoma as refractory. Equally, molecular imaging may suggest a role for treatment modalities that would otherwise have been discounted [9–11].
-
4)
Investigation of apparent discordant biochemical and radiological responses (‘pseudo-refractory tumors’).
It is well recognized that some medically treated tumors (e.g. macroprolactinomas receiving primary dopamine agonist therapy) demonstrate discordant biochemical and radiological responses, most commonly achieving endocrine remission but with little to no tumor shrinkage (Fig. 1E–F). Prolactinoma guidelines have traditionally recommended treatment goals that include both a normal serum prolactin level and a 50% reduction in tumor size [18]. However, whether failure to achieve this degree of tumor shrinkage constitutes true refractoriness is debated, and in some instances delayed shrinkage is recognized even without dopamine agonist dose escalation. Molecular imaging may offer an opportunity to identify such tumors at an early stage and potentially avoid unnecessary dose titration (Fig. 1G).
Conclusions
A small but important subgroup of PA is refractory to conventional treatment and presents a particular challenge with continued endocrine hyperfunction and/or failure of tumor regression despite multimodal therapy. Standard pituitary imaging does not always reliably identify residual tumor and this can further hinder optimal management when further treatment options are being considered. In this context, alternative MR sequences may offer additional insight regarding the extent of disease and other tumor characteristics relevant for treatment planning. The use of radiomics offers a potentially novel approach to identifying refractory tumors. Finally, we have discussed four clinical scenarios in which molecular imaging can significantly augment the effectiveness and timeliness of decision-making by accurately localizing sites of disease activity.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following clinicians for referring the patients discussed in this review for molecular imaging: Dr M Malik (case 1); Dr F Wernig, Professor K Meeran and Dr N Martin (case 2); and Professor R Banerjee (case 3).
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and approved the final version.
Funding
This work was supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. KA Huynh is supported by an ERASMUS + award. AG Kolias is supported by the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, University of Cambridge.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
No competing interests reported by any of the authors.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Melmed S (2020) Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N Engl J Med 382:937–950. 10.1056/NEJMRA1810772/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMRA1810772_DISCLOSURES.PDF [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.MacFarlane J, Bashari W, Gillett D et al (2021) Functional imaging. Pituit Tumors A Compr Interdiscip Approach 103–113. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819949-7.00048-2
- 3.Bonneville J-F (2016) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pituitary Tumors. In: Frontiers of hormone research. pp 97–120 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Lang M, Silva D, Dai L, et al. Superiority of constructive interference in steady-state MRI sequencing over T1-weighted MRI sequencing for evaluating cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary macroadenomas. J Neurosurg. 2018;130:352–359. doi: 10.3171/2017.9.JNS171699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Watanabe K, Kakeda S, Yamamoto J, et al. Delineation of optic nerves and chiasm in close proximity to large suprasellar tumors with contrast-enhanced FIESTA MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;264:852–858. doi: 10.1148/RADIOL.12111363/-/DC1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peng AJ, Dai HM, Duan HH et al (2020) A machine learning model to precisely immunohistochemically classify pituitary adenoma subtypes with radiomics based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 125. 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2020.108892 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Zhang Y, Luo Y, Kong X, et al. A preoperative MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinicopathological classifier to predict the recurrence of Pituitary Macroadenoma within 5 years. Front Neurol. 2022;12:780628. doi: 10.3389/FNEUR.2021.780628/FULL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bashari WA, Senanayake R, MacFarlane J, et al. Using Molecular Imaging to enhance decision making in the management of Pituitary Adenomas. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:57S–62S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Koulouri O, Steuwe A, Gillett D, et al. A role for 11 C-methionine PET imaging in ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:M107–M120. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O K, N K, AC H, et al. Successful treatment of residual pituitary adenoma in persistent acromegaly following localisation by 11 C-methionine PET co-registered with MRI. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016 doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bashari WA, Senanayake R, Koulouri O et al (2020) PET-guided repeat transsphenoidal surgery for previously deemed unresectable lateral disease in acromegaly. Neurosurg Focus 48. 10.3171/2020.3.FOCUS2052 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Damian A, Pineyro MM, Quagliata A, et al. 18F-fallypride and 11 C-methionine positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the study of prolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a case series. World J Nucl Med. 2021;20:286–293. doi: 10.4103/WJNM.WJNM_83_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tang H, Jiao S, Cheng Y et al (2022) DRD2 expression based on 18 F-fallypride PET/MR predicts the dopamine agonist resistance of prolactinomas: a pilot study. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2194619/v1 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Raverot G, Burman P, McCormack A, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:G1–G24. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaya G, Soydas Turan B, Dagdelen S, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Pituitary Carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:996–998. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Micko ASG, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:803–811. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu X, Ding H, Yang L, et al. Invasive Corridor of Clivus Extension in Pituitary Adenoma: Bony anatomic consideration, Surgical Outcome and Technical Nuances. Front Oncol. 2021;11:2297. doi: 10.3389/FONC.2021.689943/BIBTEX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Hyperprolactinemia: an endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:273–288. doi: 10.1210/JC.2010-1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.