. 2023 Jun 17;9(6):e17243. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17243

Table 2.

The statistical comparison of model results across China in 2010.

Classes	Feature Variables	Obs	M₁	M₂	M₃	M₄	M₅	M₆	M₇	M₈	M₉
cVeg	SD	32.12	31.66	34.48	40.70	41.51	24.82	23.55	41.28	28.76	27.18
	RMSD	0.00	41.66	45.44	53.21	54.19	36.39	36.32	63.76	41.87	11.40
	R	1.00	0.20	0.23	0.14	0.12	0.22	0.18	0.17	0.20	0.94
cSoil	SD	80.30	128.57	63.10	201.16	201.43	114.22	112.63	24.98	101.68	72.32
	RMSD	0.00	117.64	85.39	297.54	298.18	117.48	115.98	92.31	114.83	26.65
	R	1.00	0.44	0.50	0.31	0.31	0.48	0.47	0.35	0.47	0.94

Note: ‘Obs’ is field-investigated value. M₁–M₉ are BCC-CCSM2-MR, CESM2-WACCM, CMCC-CM2-SR5, CMCC-ESM2, EC-Earth3-CC, EC-Earth3-Veg, TaiESM1, MMEM and MMRFE model, respectively. MMEM stands for a multi-model ensemble average model. The SD and RMSE units are Mg C/ha.