Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;14:1136878. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for 12 original Assessment Engagement Scale (AES) items.

AES item M SD Skewness Kurtosis
1. I have a good understanding of the assessment requirements, and how to do well 3.26 0.82 −0.42 0.53
2. I have a good understanding of how the assessment tasks I am doing now relate to the rest of my program 2.94 0.90 −0.29 0.24
3. I am clear about my role in assessment and how I can contribute, and what support I am entitled to 3.15 0.97 −0.30 −0.06
4. I am clear about the requirements of the discipline 3.40 0.85 −0.67 1.02
5. I know how to ask for feedback and use feedback effectively to enhance the quality of my work 3.41 0.84 −0.38 0.45
6. I value regular opportunities to test my knowledge, understanding and skills in class and online 3.15 0.93 −0.35 0.16
7. I make sure I have done the essential preparation work so I can contribute fully to discussions and give effective support to my peers 3.09 0.93 −0.14 0.20
8. I am able to accurately judge the quality of my own work 3.05 0.84 −0.32 0.54
9. I have a good understanding of assessment rules and processes (e.g., marking and moderation) 2.95 0.90 −0.32 0.19
10. I do my best to understand fundamental ideas and concepts so I can adapt and apply them to new contexts. I am keen to advance knowledge within my discipline 3.40 0.73 −0.60 1.46
11. I know how to use the learning environment well to support my needs (e.g., accessing resources; getting support; knowing who can best help me; developing strong networks) 3.32 0.83 −0.61 0.85
12. I give constructive feedback on how the course could be improved, and I have contributed to the development of resources through my engagement with the course 3.00 0.86 −0.20 0.37