Skip to main content
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
. 2023 Apr 5;102(7):843–853. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14568

Long‐term neurological morbidity among children delivered by vacuum extraction ‐ a national cohort study

Hanna Ulfsdottir 1,2,, Cecilia Ekéus 1, Kristina Tedroff 2, Katarina Åberg 3, Hans Järnbert‐Pettersson 4
PMCID: PMC10333668  PMID: 37017927

Abstract

Introduction

This is the first nationwide cohort study of vacuum extraction (VE) and long‐term neurological morbidity. We hypothesized that VE per se, and not only complicated labor, can cause intracranial bleedings, which could further cause neurological long‐term morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of neonatal mortality, cerebral palsy (CP), and epilepsy among children delivered by VE in a long‐term perspective.

Material and methods

The study population included 1 509 589 term singleton children planned for vaginal birth in Sweden (January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2017). We investigated the risk of neonatal death (ND), CP, and epilepsy among children delivered by VE (successful or failed) and compared their risks with those born by spontaneous vaginal birth and emergency cesarean section (ECS). We used logistic regression to study the adjusted associations with each outcome. The follow‐up time was from birth until December 31, 2019.

Results

The percentage and total number of children with the outcomes were ND (0.04%, n = 616), CP (0.12%, n = 1822), and epilepsy (0.74%, n = 11 190). Compared with children delivered by ECS, those born by VE had no increased risk of ND, but there was an increased risk for those born after failed VE (adj OR 2.23 [1.33–3.72]). The risk of CP was similar among children born by VE and those born spontaneously vaginally. Further, the risk of CP was similar among children born after failed VE compared with ECS. The risk of epilepsy was not increased among children born by VE (successful/failed), compared with those who had spontaneous vaginal birth or ECS.

Conclusions

The outcomes ND, CP, and epilepsy are rare. In this nationwide cohort study, children born after successful VE had no increased risk of ND, CP or epilepsy compared with those delivered by ECS, but there was an increased risk of ND among those born by failed VE. Concerning the studied outcomes, VE appears to be a safe obstetric intervention; however, it requires a thorough risk assessment and awareness of when to convert to ECS.

Keywords: cerebral palsy, emergency cesarean section, neonatal death, spontaneous vaginal birth, vacuum extraction


This national cohort study of 1.5 million children planned for a vaginal birth investigates the risk of neonatal mortality, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy among children delivered by vacuum extraction in a long‐term perspective.Our results indicate that VE is a safe obstetric intervention concerning the studied outcomes, however, it implies a thorough risk assessment.

graphic file with name AOGS-102-843-g001.jpg


Abbreviations

AGA

average for gestational age

CP

cerebral palsy

ECS

emergency cesarean section

LGA

large for gestational age

ND

neonatal death

SGA

small for gestational age

SVB

spontaneous vaginal birth

VE

vacuum extraction

Key message.

Children born after successful vacuum extraction had no increased risk of neonatal death, cerebral palsy or epilepsy compared with those delivered by emergency cesarean section. Vacuum extraction is an equivalent or preferable alternative when needed to expedite birth; however, it requires a thorough risk assessment.

1. INTRODUCTION

Vacuum extraction (VE) is a common obstetrical procedure in the Western world, and in many countries, it has replaced the use of forceps. 1 , 2 In Sweden, VE is used in approximately 6% of all births, 14% among primiparas, and 2.8% among multiparas. Approximately 18% of women undergo a cesarean section, of those, 9.5% are emergency cesarean sections (ECS). 3 Although VE is used to prevent neonatal complications, it has been associated with rare but serious iatrogenic morbidity, such as extra‐ and intracranial hemorrhage and skull fractures. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The prevalence of intracranial hemorrhage in term infants varies widely, from 8% to 26% due to differences in the study population, follow‐up time, and the sensitivity in diagnostics. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 Minor intracranial bleedings, detected by magnetic resonance in asymptomatic infants, have not been associated with adverse outcomes. 13 , 15 However, greater bleeding (symptomatic or asymptomatic) might have an association with neonatal mortality and long‐term neurological morbidities like cerebral palsy (CP) and epilepsy.

Despite the risk of neonatal cerebral complications, few studies have investigated the association between VE on long‐term consequences, and there is a need for more evidence. 16 Previous studies on VE have limitations of small sample size and retrospective design, with no comparison made between complications in VE and ECS deliveries. Further, the use of VE has decreased in some countries in favor of ECS. 17 Since ECS in the second stage of labor is a difficult procedure with increased risk for adverse outcomes for the mother like post‐partum hemorrhage, sepsis, and uterine tear 18 , 19 , 20 it is important to clarify the risks and benefits of both VE and ECS.

Our hypothesis is that VE per se, can cause intracranial hemorrhage and that these in turn could lead to neurological damage. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of neonatal death and long‐term neurological morbidity, that is, CP and epilepsy among children delivered at term by VE (successful and failed), and to compare their risks with those born spontaneously and by ECS.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

This historical cohort study used data from nationwide Swedish registries which were linked using the unique personal identification number assigned to all Swedish residents at birth or on a residence permit. Information from the Medical Birth Register 21 was cross‐linked with data from the National Patient Registry. 22

The Swedish Medical Birth Register includes prospectively collected information on demographic data, reproductive history, and complications during pregnancy, childbirth, and the neonatal period for more than 98% of all births in Sweden. It also includes maternal characteristics which are obtained in a standardized manner from the woman's first antenatal visit, throughout pregnancy and birth. The National Patient Registry contains diagnostic codes on hospital inpatient care since 1987, and outpatient care from 2001 onwards, including dates for diagnoses. 22 , 23

The study population was retrieved from Swedish Medical Birth Register and included all singleton children born in Sweden from 1999 to 2017. Pre‐ and post‐term babies were excluded in order to obtain a study population in the normal range of gestational age, that is, week 37.0–41.6. All fetuses were alive when entering labor. The onset of labor was spontaneous or induced, and modes of delivery were divided into VE, ECS, and spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB). Births with VE followed by ECS were analyzed separately and were defined as “failed VE” (Flow chart, Figure 1). The follow‐up time was from birth until December 31, 2019, which implied a follow‐up time between 2 and 21 years depending on the date of birth. Breech presentation, elective cesarean section, multiple births, congenital malformations (see attached file with diagnoses), antepartum stillbirths, and births where forceps were used (both combined with VE or ECS and exclusively) were excluded (n = 217 789), see flow chart, Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow chart describing the study population and mode of birth.

Diagnoses were defined according to the Swedish version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐10) (Table S1). We investigated three main outcomes: Neonatal death, CP and epilepsy. Neonatal death was defined as death within 28 days after birth, CP was defined as any G80 after birth and epilepsy was defined as any G40 set after 28 days on two different occasions or an R56 code first, followed by a G40 at a later date. These outcomes were found by merging the registries described above, using the unique personal identification number assigned to all Swedish residents at birth.

Information on maternal characteristics, birth characteristics, and neonatal characteristics were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Parity was categorized into primipara or multipara. Measured weight and self‐reported height at the first antenatal visit were used to calculate early pregnancy body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). BMI was categorized according to WHO standards; underweight (below 18.5) normal (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), obese (≥30), or missing. 24 Self‐reported information from the first antenatal visit regarding smoking was categorized as smoker or non‐smoker. Gestational age (GA), based on routine ultrasound dating performed before 18 postmenstrual weeks in 97%–98% of all pregnant women, was categorized into 37.0–38.6, 39.0–40.6, 41.0–41.6. Birthweight for gestational age was categorized into small for gestational age (SGA) (< −2SDs), appropriate for gestational age (AGA) (−2 SD + 2 SD), and large for gestational age (LGA) (> +2SDs). 25 The fetal position at birth was divided into: occiput anterior, or positions other than occiput anterior. Fetal distress was defined by the diagnostic codes O680‐O683, O688, and O689. Intrauterine hypoxia, meaning hypoxia before the onset of labor, was defined as the diagnosis P200. For codes on further diagnoses, see Table S1.

2.1. Statistical analyses

We described the characteristics of the cohort according to the mode of birth with number (N) and percent (Table 1). We calculated the incidence risk for each outcome as the number of the outcome divided by the number of born children, presented as percentages.

TABLE 1.

. Characteristics of the study population and mode of birth.

Mode of birth
Vaginal VE Failed VE ECS
N % N % N % N %
Covariates known at onset of labor
Maternal age (year)
≤19 20 883 1.6 1628 1.5 53 1.1 995 1.0
20–34 1 029 360 79.4 89 319 80.8 3877 79.4 71 862 73.1
>34 245 717 19.0 19 556 17.7 952 19.5 25 387 25.8
Maternal height (cm)
<162 316 180 24.4 31 885 28.9 1657 33.9 37 474 38.1
≥162–172 698 548 53.9 57 425 52.0 2423 49.6 45 995 46.8
>172 214 911 16.6 15 344 13.9 584 12.0 9333 9.5
Missing 66 321 5.1 5849 5.3 218 4.5 5442 5.5
BMI
<18.50 30 758 2.4 2861 2.6 81 1.7 1301 1.3
18.5–24.9 731 260 56.4 64 697 58.5 2682 54.9 44 366 45.2
25.0–29.9 288 290 22.2 23 688 21.4 1208 24.7 26 335 26.8
≥30.0 129 940 10.0 9134 8.3 511 10.5 16 903 17.2
Missing 115 712 8.9 10 123 9.2 400 8.2 9339 9.5
Parity
Primipara 501 588 38.7 87 232 78.9 4024 82.4 60 722 61.8
Multipara 794 372 61.3 23 271 21.1 858 17.6 37 522 38.2
Smoking at enrolment in maternity health care
Non‐smoker 1 135 996 88.3 98 184 89.4 4452 91.9 85 795 88.0
Smoker 91 809 7.1 6547 6.0 200 4.1 6897 7.1
Missing 58 118 4.5 5155 4.7 193 4.0 4829 5.0
Maternal CP 21 0.0 3 0.0 0 0.0 11 0.0
Maternal epilepsy 2266 0.2 254 0.2 12 0.2 249 0.3
Maternal diabetes (type 1/2/GDM) 16 246 1.3 1873 1.7 122 2.5 3720 3.8
Hypertension or PE 27 768 2.1 4351 3.9 192 3.9 7847 8.0
SGA or LGA
AGA 1 234 950 95.3 104 614 94.7 4550 93.2 87 186 88.7
SGA 19 684 1.5 2841 2.6 50 1.0 4088 4.2
LGA 39 288 3.0 2835 2.6 266 5.4 6759 6.9
Missing 2038 0.2 213 0.2 16 0.3 211 0.2
Gestational week
37+0–38+6 223 921 17.3 14 488 13.1 504 10.3 20 039 20.4
39+0–40+6 797 269 61.5 63 285 57.3 2617 53.6 48 273 49.1
41+0–41+6 274 770 21.2 32 730 29.6 1761 36.1 29 932 30.5
Intrapartum covariates
Intrauterine hypoxia 18 0.0 20 0.0 1 0.0 43 0.0
Fever during labor 4411 0.3 1982 1.8 132 2.7 3177 3.2
Chorioamnionitis 579 0.0 273 0.2 30 0.6 1473 1.5
Signs of fetal distress 16 984 1.3 51 591 46.7 2142 43.9 35 564 36.2
Prolonged labor 80 589 6.2 49 063 44.4 2867 58.7 38 690 39.4
Maternal exhaustion 6085 0.5 6858 6.2 292 6.0 2014 2.0
Indication for VE or ECS
Signs of fetal distress 13 565 1.0 39 064 35.4 1287 26.4 27 336 27.8
Prolonged labor 77 320 6.0 37 397 33.8 2051 42.0 30 690 31.2
Both 3419 0.3 12 527 11.3 855 17.5 8228 8.4
None of these 1 201 656 92.7 21 515 19.5 689 14.1 31 990 32.6
Shoulder dystocia 2459 0.2 1130 1.0 0 0.0 4 0.0
Occiput anterior position
No 43 946 3.4 11 568 10.5 1881 38.5 26 543 27.0
Missing 25 100 1.9 1880 1.7 664 13.6 15 153 15.4
Covariates known after birth
Apgar <7 after 5 min
4928 0.4 2984 2.7 395 8.1 3350 3.4
Missing 7071 0.5 310 0.3 14 0.3 446 0.5
Sex
Girl 651 058 50.2 48 398 43.8 1931 39.6 44 301 45.1
Missing 2032 0.2 212 0.2 16 0.3 211 0.2
Infant birthweight (g)
<3000 130 465 10.1 12 047 10.9 269 5.5 12 585 12.8
3001–3500 445 879 34.4 37 274 33.7 1244 25.5 27 262 27.7
3501–4000 486 001 37.5 40 874 37.0 1972 40.4 32 483 33.1
4001–4500 192 503 14.9 16 844 15.2 1062 21.8 19 102 19.4
>4501 39 080 3.0 3252 2.9 319 6.5 6601 6.7
Meconium aspiration 1000 0.1 246 0.2 23 0.5 557 0.6
Intracranial bleeding 307 0.0 153 0.1 11 0.2 65 0.1
Neonatal convulsions 905 0.1 462 0.4 44 0.9 442 0.4
Disturbances of cerebral status/encephalopathy 613 0.0 551 0.5 63 1.3 524 0.5
Neonatal infections 4108 0.3 624 0.6 44 0.9 665 0.7
Jaundice 29 066 2.2 5868 5.3 326 6.7 2316 2.4
Hypoglycemia 18 441 1.4 2985 2.7 199 4.1 5855 6.0
Epilepsy 9254 0.7 921 0.8 47 1.0 968 1.0
CP 1276 0.1 219 0.2 19 0.4 308 0.3
Neonatal death 339 0.0 96 0.1 17 0.3 164 0.2
Year of birth
1999–2005 426 847 32.9 37 797 34.2 1314 26.9 31 148 31.7
2006–2010 347 772 26.8 33 318 30.2 1450 29.7 27 836 28.3
2011–2015 369 102 28.5 29 718 26.9 1529 31.3 28 188 28.7
2016–2017 152 239 11.7 9670 8.8 589 12.1 11 072 11.3

Abbreviations: CP, cerebral palsy; ECS, emergency cesarean section; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; LGA, large for gestational age; PE, pre‐eclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age; VE, vacuum extraction.

To study the associations between the mode of birth and each of the outcomes, we first compared children delivered by ECS, VE, and Failed VE with spontaneous vaginal birth as reference (Figures 2, 3, 4). Second, to compare VE and Failed VE with ECS, we repeated the analysis with ECS as a reference (Figure 5).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Associations between neonatal death and mode of birth. Adjusted odds ratio (Adj OR) are adjusted for all covariates in Figure 2 known before birth. CP, cerebral palsy; ECS, emergency cesarean section; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; LGA, large for gestational age, PE, pre‐eclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age; VE, vacuum extraction.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Associations between cerebral palsy (CP) and mode of birth. Adjusted odds ratio (Adj OR) are adjusted for all covariates in Figure 3 known before birth. CP, cerebral palsy; ECS, emergency cesarean section; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; LGA, large for gestational age; PE, pre‐eclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age; VE, vacuum extraction.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Associations between epilepsy and mode of birth. Adjusted odds ratio (Adj OR) are adjusted for all covariates in Figure 4 known before birth. CP, cerebral palsy; ECS, emergency cesarean section; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; LGA, large for gestational age; PE, pre‐eclampsia; SGA, small for gestational age; VE, vacuum extraction.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Associations between the three outcomes, Neonatal death, cerebral palsy (CP), epilepsy and vacuum extraction (VE). The adjusted odds ratio (Adj OR) are adjusted for the same covariates as in the Figures 2, 3, 4.

We used logistic regression to estimate the associations. Two models were used for each outcome, one crude and one adjusted. For each outcome, we adjusted for covariates, known before birth, in Figures 2, 3, 4 as categorical variables presented in each table. We adjusted for covariates associated with both the mode of birth and the outcomes (age, maternal height, BMI, parity, diabetes, pre‐eclampsia or hypertension, SGA/LGA, fever during labor, signs of fetal distress, intrauterine hypoxia, other than occiput anterior position, maternal CP or epilepsy and year of birth). Maternal height was included since short maternal stature is associated with complications during labor and height may be considered when choosing between VE and ECS. SGA/LGA was included since ultrasound with weight estimations are done frequently if there are deviations in the babies´ size, hence this information is known during labor and may affect decision‐making when there is a need to expedite birth.

No imputation of data was done and missing data were entered as a separate category in the analysis. We used forest plots to summarize the associations between the covariates and each outcome and present the number of children and present the risk for each outcome. We present associations as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in forest plots. CI intervals that do not cover one were regarded as significant, at 5% significance level All analyses were done in IBM SPSS version 28 and R version 4.0.1.

2.2. Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee in Stockholm, Dnr: 2013/1922–31/24 on November 27, 2013, amendment approved September 25, 2019.

3. RESULTS

During the 19 year study period, 1 509 589 births fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. The proportion of children delivered by VE was 7.3% (n = 110 503), failed VE constituted of 0.3% (n = 4882), ECS 6.5% (n = 98 244), and SVB 85.8% (n = 1 295 960).

Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Primiparas were more common among women giving birth by VE (both failed and successful) and ECS, while multiparas were more common among those giving birth spontaneously vaginally. In the ECS group, more women were overweight or obese as compared to women in the VE and SVB groups. The proportions of infants born SGA or LGA were overrepresented in the ECS group, and LGA infants were overrepresented in the group of failed VE.

The percent of neonates diagnosed with intracranial bleeding was highest in the group of failed VE (0.22%), followed by successful VE (0.14%), ECS (0.07%), and the group of SVB (0.02%). Further, percentages of jaundice, neonatal convulsions, and other disturbances of cerebral status/encephalopathy were highest in the failed VE group.

3.1. Neonatal death

In total, there were 616 neonatal deaths in our cohort, of those, 96 (15.6%) were born by VE, 17(2.8%) by failed VE, 164 (26.6%) by ECS, and 339 (55.0%) by SVB (Figure 2). Compared with children born spontaneously vaginally, the risk of neonatal death (ND) was higher among children born by failed VE, adj OR 6.17 (3.59–10.60), by ECS adj OR 2.77 (2.13–3.61) and successful VE adj OR 1.61 (1.20–2.15). Compared with children delivered with ECS, the risk was higher among failed VE but lower compared with VE (Figure 5). The strongest associations with ND were intrauterine hypoxia and signs of fetal distress.

3.2. Cerebral palsy (CP)

Among the 1822 children diagnosed with CP, 219 (12.0%) were delivered by VE, 19 (1.0%) by failed VE, 308 (16.9%) by ECS, and 1276 (70.0%) by SVB (Figure 3). Compared with children born SVB, children born by failed VE had the highest risks for CP, adj OR 2.39 (95% CI: 1.49–3.84), followed by ECS, adj OR 1.80 (95% CI: 1.52–2.13). After adjusting for covariates known before birth, there was no difference in the risk of CP between children born SVB and those born by VE. Further, there was no difference between failed VE and ECS (Figure 5). The covariates having the highest associations with CP were intrauterine hypoxia, SGA, and signs of fetal distress.

3.3. Epilepsy

Of the 11 190 children who were diagnosed with epilepsy, 921 (8.2%) were born by VE, 47 (4.2%) by failed VE, 968 (8.7%) by ECS, and 9254 (82.7%) by SVB (Figure 4). Compared with children born SVB, those born by successful VE, adj OR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.96–1.13) and failed VE, adj OR 1.29 (95% CI: 0.96–1.73) had no increased risk of epilepsy. However, children born by ECS had a slightly increased risk; adj OR 1.21 (1.12–1.32). The covariates intrauterine hypoxia, and maternal epilepsy diagnosis had the strongest associations with epilepsy in offspring.

There were 802 children who had both CP and epilepsy diagnoses. Thus, among children with CP, nearly half of them also had epilepsy.

4. DISCUSSION

We found that the risk of ND was higher among children born by failed VE but lower among those born by successful VE compared with children delivered with ECS. However, compared with SVB, all three interventions were associated with an increased risk of ND. Regarding CP, the risk was similar among children born by VE compared with those who had SVB and lower compared with those delivered by ESC. Among children born after failed VE, the risk of CP was similar to those born by ESC. Further, compared with children born spontaneously vaginally, the risk of epilepsy was similar among children born by VE (successful or failed). Compared with children delivered with ECS, the risk of epilepsy was slightly lower among those born by VE.

The access to high‐quality health‐registries made it possible to perform a nationwide cohort study including 1.5 million term births and to investigate associations of rare neurological outcomes and events with different modes of birth in a long‐term follow‐up. Data was based on medical birth records and registries with standardized variables coded in the same way, without involving the patients, thus minimizing various types of bias (i.e., selection and recall bias). Moreover, maternity care is free of charge in Sweden, management routines, as well as gestational age determination are standardized, and 99% of women give birth in public hospitals. This minimizes the risk of confounding by unmeasured sociodemographic factors. Adjustments for covariates that may affect the decision of birth mode were done, including the diagnoses signs of fetal distress and intrauterine hypoxia. 26 The latter, implicating hypoxia debuting before labor, were strongly associated with both CP, epilepsy and ND. The adjustments reduced the risk of confounding by indication, detected in the difference between the crude and adjusted models. Having missing values in some covariates was strongly associated with the outcomes, for example, missing birthweight and missing occiput position. The reasons are probably that the task of writing a complete birth record is not prioritized if the neonate is very compromised when born. The potential impact of the missing data on covariates is unknown. We did not perform any multiple imputations (MI) because the non‐testable assumption of missing completely at random that MI is based on is likely not fulfilled. 27

A major limitation was that the data on mode of birth included ECS in both the first and second stages of labor, and not only the second stage, which had been the optimal comparison group. Hence the groups of ECS and VE may differ in some respects; neonates in the ECS group may be a more fragile group, showing intolerance for labor in the first stage of labor, and children in the VE group have been exposed to a longer duration of labor than the ECS‐group. Another limitation is that we had no information on the duration of labor and the use of oxytocin, aspects that are also associated with the outcomes. 28 Further, the registries do not contain detailed information about important characteristics of the VE deliveries (i.e., type of VE instrument, station of the fetal head, the skill of the obstetrician, duration of VE, and cup detachment). Additionally, the risk of confounding by indication cannot be completely eliminated even if we adjusted for indications for VE and ECS such as fetal distress. Hence, the groups may still differ in aspects not possible to adjust for.

Several studies have reported severe neurological morbidity among children born by protracted or failed VE 4 , 29 , 30 , 31 but contradictive results exist. 32 VE converted to ECS is, per se, more complicated than successful VE. Complications include longer duration of extraction, number of pulls, or cup detachments. Converting to cesarean section also prolongs the time to birth which can worsen asphyxia. Additionally, when a subsequent ECS is conducted, the head of the fetus squeezes through the birth canal a second time, which might increase the trauma against the fetal head. 33 The similar risks when comparing VE and ECS, indicate that the complicated birth rather than the extraction itself impacts the outcomes. These results are in line with some previous studies. 14 , 34 The described characteristics related to the mode of birth, highlight the importance of assessing risk factors for failed VE (eg LGA, occiput posterior position, mid‐pelvic‐fetal station, short maternal stature, epidural anesthesia) and following clinical guidelines in the management of VE. 33 , 35

A review of guidelines for instrumental births in the Anglo‐Saxon world found a wide consensus regarding indication, contraindications, and prerequisites, 20 indicating that generalizability is possible in similar contexts. In Sweden, national advice for clinical guidelines has been developed over the years. 36

The chosen outcomes are rare but severe. CP is a lifelong disability that implies a decreased quality of life as well as high societal costs, while epilepsy has a more heterogeneous long‐term outcome, and remission among children is common. 37 , 38 This study contributes to knowledge of these outcomes which in some instances can have a preventable effect, that is, to carefully assess risk factors for failed VE, following guidelines for the management of VE, and converting to ECS in time. Furthermore, the increased risk for complications and adverse outcomes for the mother is not considered in this study. 17 , 18 , 39

5. CONCLUSION

The absolute risks of ND, CP, and epilepsy are very low; however, the number of children born globally is high, which implies that the outcomes affect many children. The present study shows an increased risk of ND after failed VE compared with ECS, but not after successful VE. For the outcome CP, children born by successful VE had similar risk compared with those who had SVB and after failed VE, the risk of CP was similar to those delivered by ECS. Regarding epilepsy, VE (failed or successful) was not associated with increased risks compared to SVB or ECS.

Our results indicate that VE is a safe obstetric intervention concerning the studied outcomes; however, it implies a thorough risk assessment. Causality could not be established in this cohort study and the higher OR in both VE and ECS groups compared with SVB indicate that the complicated labor rather than the mode of the birth per se is associated with the outcomes.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CE initiated the study and retrieved the data and all authors designed the study. The statistical analyses were made by HP and HU. The manuscript was written by HU who received continuous input from all authors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None.

Supporting information

Table S1.

Ulfsdottir H, Ekéus C, Tedroff K, Åberg K, Järnbert‐Pettersson H. Long‐term neurological morbidity among children delivered by vacuum extraction ‐ a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102:843‐853. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14568

REFERENCES

  • 1. Edozien LC. Towards safe practice in instrumental vaginal delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:639‐655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68:1‐47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Welfare NBoHa . The Swedish medical birth register, statistics on pregnancies, births and newborn infants 2020. Socialstyreslen; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18:129‐134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Head trauma after instrumental births. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:69‐83. viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Swanson AE, Veldman A, Wallace EM, Malhotra A. Subgaleal hemorrhage: risk factors and outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:260‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Uchil D, Arulkumaran S. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:687‐693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ali UA, Norwitz ER. Vacuum‐assisted vaginal delivery. Rev. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:5‐17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, et al. Neonatal complications of vacuum‐assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:626‐633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ekéus C, Högberg U, Norman M. Vacuum assisted birth and risk for cerebral complications in term newborn infants: a population‐based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gupta SN, Kechli AM, Kanamalla US. Intracranial hemorrhage in term newborns: management and outcomes. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;40:1‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Rutter S, et al. Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factors. Lancet. 2004;363:846‐851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Looney CB, Smith JK, Merck LH, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in asymptomatic neonates: prevalence on MR images and relationship to obstetric and neonatal risk factors. Radiology. 2007;242:535‐541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby‐Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709‐1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Holden KR, Titus MO, Van Tassel P. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging examination of normal term neonates: a pilot study. J Child Neurol. 1999;14:708‐710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schot MJ, Halbertsma FJ, Katgert T, Bok LA. Development of children with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage born after vacuum extraction. J Child Neurol. 2013;28:520‐523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Corry EMA, Ramphul M, Rowan AM, Segurado R, Mahony RM, Keane DP. Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections‐a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:188‐191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. McKelvey A, Ashe R, McKenna D, Roberts R. Caesarean section in the second stage of labour: a retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30:264‐267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:1203‐1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tsakiridis I, Giouleka S, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Daniilidis A, Dagklis T. Operative vaginal delivery: a review of four national guidelines. J Perinat Med. 2020;48:189‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Källén B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1990;18:143‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Welfare SNBoHa . Quality and Content in the Swedish Patient Register 2018.
  • 24. WHO . Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2000. [PubMed]
  • 25. Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. Management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the international societies of pediatric endocrinology and the growth hormone research society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:804‐810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Persson M, Razaz N, Tedroff K, Joseph KS, Cnattingius S. Five and 10 minute Apgar scores and risks of cerebral palsy and epilepsy: population based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ. 2018;360:k207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Berglund S, Grunewald C, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for asphyxia associated with substandard care during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:39‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Åberg K, Norman M, Pettersson K, Järnbert‐Pettersson H, Ekéus C. Protracted vacuum extraction and neonatal intracranial hemorrhage among infants born at term: a nationwide case‐control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:523‐532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Lisonkova S, et al. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station. CMAJ. 2017;189:E764‐e72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Panelli DM, Leonard SA, Joudi N, et al. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3:100339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mastrolia SA, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Landau D, Sergienko R, Walfisch A. Failed vacuum and the long‐term neurological impact on the offspring. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34:1306‐1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ahlberg M, Norman M, Hjelmstedt A, Ekéus C. Risk factors for failed vacuum extraction and associated complications in term newborn infants: a population‐based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1646‐1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Walsh CA, Robson M, McAuliffe FM. Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:122‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vayssière C, Beucher G, Dupuis O, et al. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:43‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. LÖF Stjernholm YWM, Ahlberg M, Amer‐Wåhlin I. Instrumental delivery with VE/Instrumentell förlossning med sugklocka Swedish Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. https://lof.se/patientsakerhet/vara‐projekt/saker‐forlossningsvard/: LÖF Säker förlossningsvård 2017.
  • 37. Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, et al. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:15082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Guerrini R. Epilepsy in children. Lancet. 2006;367:499‐524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Muraca GM, Boutin A, Razaz N, et al. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery. CMAJ. 2022;194:E1‐e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1.


Articles from Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

RESOURCES