Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 14;7(12):2657–2669. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008240

Table 3.

Predictors of PFS on MVA

All patients receiving CAR-T therapy
Variable HR 95% CI P value
Age, at apheresis, y 1.0 0.98-1.02 .87
Female sex (yes/no) 1.06 0.66-1.70 .81
Histologic subtype (de novo DLBCL/all others) 0.94 0.79-1.12 .46
Non-GCB cell of origin (yes/no) 1.07 0.66-1.72 .79
LDH elevation, at apheresis (yes/no) 1.65 0.96-2.85 .07
IPI score, at apheresis 1.23 0.94-1.62 .13
Stage, at apheresis 0.91 0.68-1.21 .52
CNS disease, at apheresis (yes/no) 1.28 0.48-3.71 .63
Prior autologous HCT (yes/no) 1.29 0.74 - 2.26 .37
Number of lines pre–CAR-T 1.47 1.16-1.89 <.01
CAR-T construct (axi-cel/tisa-cel) 1.17 0.82-1.69 .38
Double hit/double expressor status (DH/DE/other) 0.85 0.63-1.14 .29
BT (yes/no) 1.72 1.05-2.82 .03
Days between apheresis and CAR-T 1.0 0.99-1.01 .98
Patients receiving BT
Variable (yes/no) HR 95% CI P value
Chemotherapy-based 5.15 1.55-18.25 <.01
RT§ 1.93 0.49-7.94 .35
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody 3.91 0.50-40.40 .21
Steroids alone 2.5 0.53-12.63 .25
IMiD-based 5.24 1.22-24.91 .03
Polatuzumab + bendamustine + rituximab 2.14 0.56-8.57 .27
BTK inhibitor +/− CD20 antibody 2.21 0.49-10.57 .31
Patients with CAR-T failure
Variable HR 95% CI P value
Age, y 1.02 0.97-1.06 .50
Female sex (yes/no) 0.63 0.19-1.9 .43
IPI > 1 (yes/no) 1.42 0.75-2.8 .29
Stage at diagnosis 1.25 0.72-2.2 .42
Non-GCB cell of origin (yes/no) 2.94 0.97-10.1 .07
Elevated LDH at apheresis (yes/no) 0.63 0.18-2.2 .47
>2 lines of therapy pre–CAR-T (yes/no) 1.89 1.1-3.5 .03
Double hit/double expressor status (DH/DE/other) 0.42 0.18-0.89 .03
CNS involvement (yes/no) 0.18 0.02-1.5 .11
Prior autologous HCT (yes/no) 0.70 0.2-2.6 .58
Extranodal disease at apheresis (yes/no) 0.68 0.17-2.5 .57
CAR-T construct (axi-cel/tisa-cel) 1.75 0.80-4.2 .18
Days between apheresis and CAR-T 1.02 0.99-1.06 .34
Patients receiving first-line therapy after CAR-T failure
Variable (yes/no) HR 95% CI P value
Chemotherapy 1.4 0.15-33.9 .78
Radiation +/− steroids 0.21 0.028-1.15 .11
Lenalidomide-based 0.15 0.026-0.76 .03
Polatuzumab + bendamustine + rituximab 0.097 0.013-0.57 .01
Checkpoint inhibitor-based 0.26 0.03-2.2 .20

Multivariate modeling using Cox regression was constructed using demographic and clinical variables to determine the impact of variables on survival outcomes. Significant P values are shown in boldface.

BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; DE, double expressor; DH, double hit.

Linear.

Ordinal.

Axi-cel vs tisa-cel only was included in the MVA owing to small sample size of liso-cel.

§

Two the 34 patients who received RT as bridging received steroids concurrently with their radiation.