TABLE 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis adaptation to college life with associated factors (N = 247).

Variables	Step 1				Step 2
	B	S.E	ß	t(p)	B	S.E	ß	t(p)
Constant	3.388	0.097		34.762 (<0.001)	1.220	0.198		6.151 (<0.001)
Gender (ref: female)	0.177	0.085	0.126	2.089 (0.038)	0.060	0.064	0.043	0.935 (0.351)
Grade (ref: 1st)
2nd	−0.077	0.094	−0.061	−0.822 (0.412)	−0.045	0.070	−0.036	−0.649 (0.517)
3rd	0.041	0.108	0.027	0.377 (0.707)	0.035	0.080	0.023	0.439 (0.661)
4th	0.087	0.083	0.083	1.037 (0.301)	0.000	0.062	0.000	−0.007 (0.994)
Club activity (ref: No)	0.329	0.065	0.303	5.096 (<0.001)	0.191	0.049	0.176	3.912 (<0.001)
Socioeconomic status(ref: High)
Medium	−0.247	0.071	−0.239	−3.466 (0.001)	−0.070	0.055	−0.067	−1.274 (0.204)
Low	−0.376	0.088	−0.292	−4.254 (<0.001)	−0.139	0.068	−0.108	−2.036 (0.043)
Consultation (ref: ≤1)
2–3	0.042	0.065	0.039	0.649 (0.517)	−0.013	0.048	−0.012	−0.265 (0.792)
≥4	0.210	0.110	0.118	1.913 (0.057)	0.036	0.082	0.020	0.433 (0.666)
Learning types (ref: Diverger)
Assimilator	0.081	0.078	0.065	1.042 (0.299)	−0.032	0.058	−0.026	−0.554 (0.580)
Converger	0.158	0.154	0.060	1.025 (0.306)	0.055	0.115	0.021	0.482 (0.630)
Accommodator	0.193	0.070	0.176	2.765 (0.006)	0.100	0.053	0.091	1.889 (0.060)
Grit					−0.014	0.082	−0.011	−0.169 (0.866)
Learning commitment					0.234	0.031	0.392	7.514 (<0.001)
Self‐efficacy					0.434	0.066	0.402	6.616 (<0.001)
	R 2 = 0.251, Adj R 2 = 0.213 F(p) = 6.546 (<0.001)				R 2 = 0.596, Adj R 2 = 0.570 F(p) = 22.766 (<0.001)

Note: ref: each dummy variable's reference group. Club activity ‘Yes’ group have a greater influence on adaptation to college life than ‘No’ group, socioeconomic status ‘high’ have a greater influence on adaptation to college life than low group.