Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 19;41:100627. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100627

Table 2.

Details of patients who underwent online adaptation for OAR constraint violation or to improve target coverage.

OAR Constraint Violation Hard Constraint Violation Frequency Violation %
Duodenum or small bowel < 0.5 cc at 36 Gy 94 / 495 19.0
Stomach < 0.5 cc at 36 Gy 51 / 495 10.3
Large bowel < 0.5 cc at 36 Gy 25 / 495 5.1
Heart < 15 cc at 32 Gy 9 / 495 1.8
Uninvolved liver < 700 cc at 20 Gy
< 33 % at 25 Gy
2 / 495 0.4
Esophagus < 0.5 cc at 36 Gy 1 / 495 0.2
Kidneys Mean < 18 Gy 1 / 495 0.2
Spinal cord < 0.5 cc at 25 Gy 0 / 495 0.0
Target Coverage N Statistic Pre-adaptation Post-adaptation Change in PTV Coverage (Δ) P-value
PTV ≥ 95 % at 50 Gy 39 Median (IQR) 87 (78 – 93) 92 (81 – 97) 3.8 (1.0 – 9.1) <0.01
Range 41 – 98 36 – 100 −4.6 – 20.8
PTV ≥ 95 % at 47.5 Gy 34 Median (IQR) 91 (82 – 96) 95 (87 – 99) 3.2 (1.3 – 5.2) <0.01
Range 56 – 100 68 – 100 −1.6 – 20.3
PTV Optimized ≥ 95 % 34 Median (IQR) 98 (95 – 100) 98 (97 – 100) 0.11 (-0.10 – 0.70) 0.04
at 47.5 Gy Range 56 – 100 53 – 100 −5.1 – 15.9

1Statistical test performed: Wilcoxon signed rank test.

PTV, Planning Target Volume.