Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 19;14(4):652–670. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.04.003

TABLE 5.

Study design details, population characteristics, and key findings from case-control studies describing the associations between whole-grain intake and cognition, mood, anxiety, and depression outcomes

Author, year Country Cases Controls Mean age [range], y % Male Racial or ethnic background (%) Health status for controls Dietary whole-grain assessment method (foods) Outcome assessment method Outcome analyzed Key findings1
Mood, anxiety, and depression
Davison, 2012 [47] Canada 97 1823 NR [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70]] 46.7 NR Generally healthy FFQ and 3-d food record (whole grains) Members of the Mood Disorders Association of British Columbia (MDABC) were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), the Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D), and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) by a trained clinical interviewer Mood disorders Whole-grain intake was greater in controls vs. cases: ++
Stefanska, 2014 [48] Poland 75 75 43.2 [[18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64]] 26.7 NR 100% healthy FFQ (groats and rye bread) Identification of a 5-y, recurrent depressive disorder by a psychiatry specialist according to ICD-10 Depression Groats intake was greater in female controls vs. cases: ++
Groats intake between male cases and controls: 0
Rye bread intake between male and female cases and controls: 0

Abbreviations: DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition; NR, not reported.

1

Key findings’ symbols: ++ significant associations (P ≤ 0.05); + marginally significant associations (0.05 < P < 0.1); 0 no associations.