Comparison of the sensing performance of the developed sensors Sa-TN50/Cu-BTC/GCE and those reported in literaturea.
| Modified electrodes | Analytes | Linear range (μM) | Detection limit (μM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuFe2O4/1H3MBr/PE | DXEP | 0.3–300 | 0.09 | 58 |
| (CPE/CuO-NPs/HMIPF6 | 0.7–900 | 0.2 | 59 | |
| ZA/CPE | 0.5–70 | 0.2 | 60 | |
| ZX/CPE | 0.5–70 | 0.08 | 60 | |
| Sa-TN 50 /Cu-BTC/GCE | 1–138 | 0.4 | This work | |
| AuNPs/poly(trisamine)/GCE | AC | 1.9–188 | 0.1 | 61 |
| NiO/CNTs/DPID/CPE | 0.8–550 | 0.3 | 62 | |
| CoTPyPRu(bipy)2–Ba/GCE | 1–50 | 0.2 | 63 | |
| Au@Pd HNRs/BG/GCE | 130–1010 | 6.35 | 64 | |
| poly-L-Asp/GPE | 0.05–108.25 | 0.011 | 65 | |
| poly(Val)/CPE | 5– 60 | 0.29 | 66 | |
| AuNPs/MWCNT/GCE | 0.09–35.0 | 0.03 | 67 | |
| TCPP–Sa/CPE | 1 – 90 | 0.2 | 68 | |
| HKUST-1/GCE | 12.5–75 | 0.11 | 69 | |
| MWMOF-199/GCE | 0.1–5 | 1.3 | 70 | |
| ZA/CPE | 0.5–70 | 0.3 | 60 | |
| ZX/CPE | 0.5–70 | 0.2 | 60 | |
| Sa-TN 50 /Cu-BTC/GCE | 4–154.3 | 0.7 | This work | |
| AuNPs/poly(trisamine)/GCE | TYR | 3.9–61.8 | 0.9 | 61 |
| NiO/CNTs/DPID/CPE | 5.0–750.0 | 1 | 62 | |
| CoTPyPRu(bipy)2–Ba/GCE | 1–25 | 0.5 | 63 | |
| Au@Pd HNRs/BG/GCE | 30.00–360.00 | 3.71 | 64 | |
| poly-L-Asp/GPE | 0.1–93.9 | 0.31 | 65 | |
| AuNPs/MWCNT/GCE | 0.4–80 | 0.21 | 67 | |
| TCPP–Sa/CPE | 3–51 | 0.7 | 68 | |
| Sa-TN 50 /Cu-BTC/GCE | 1–21.6 | 0.2 | This work |
a
AuNP: gold nanoparticle, HNRs: hybrid nanorods; CPE: carbon paste electrode; HMIPF6: n-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate H3MBr: 1-hexyl 1-3 methylimidazolium bromide; ZIF zeolitic imiazole framework; Val: valine; MWMOF: microwave organic framework; DPID: 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenethyl) isoindoline-1,3-dione; H3MTFB: 1-hexyl 3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate; L-Asp: l-aspartic acid, ZX: zeolite X; ZA: zeolite A; SPE: screen printed electrode.