Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;8(7):1389–1398. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.04.024

Table 3.

Association of occupation, gender, years worked, program size, and country income status with clinicians’ perceptions toward exercise and physical activity in patients on peritoneal dialysis

Participant characteristics It is important for PD patients to be physically active
OR (95% CI)
P-value I promote participation in exercise or physical activity to PD patients
OR (95% CI)
P-value I am confident in prescribing exercise for my PD patients
OR (95% CI)
P-value PD patients can benefit from a structured exercise program
OR (95% CI)
P-value
Gender 0.643 0.002 0.989 0.830
 Female Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Male 0.91 (0.66, 1.25) 0.43 (0.26, 0.73) 1.00 (0.68, 1.47) 1.07 (0.58, 1.99)
Occupation n/a n/a <0.001 n/a
 Nephrologist Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Dietician -- 0.91 (0.50, 1.67) 0.33 (0.19, 0.55) 0.94 (0.52, 1.69)
 Exercise professional -- 1.62 (0.35, 7.40) 9.96 (1.96, 50.5) --
 Nurse 0.94 (0.74, 1.20) 0.70 (0.46, 1.08) 1.14 (0.76, 1.70) 1.08 (0.51, 2.27)
 Social worker -- -- 0.46 (0.23, 0.90) --
 Other -- 0.28 (0.11, 0.73) 0.93 (0.42, 2.06) --
Work experience 0.039 0.301 0.006 0.322
 <2 yr Ref Ref Ref Ref
 2–5 yr 1.37 (0.98, 1.92) 1.44 (0.87, 2.39) 1.37 (0.93, 2.03) 2.00 (0.79, 5.06)
 >5 yr 1.45 (1.00, 2.10) 1.68 (0.85, 3.33) 2.04 (1.30, 3.20) 1.77 (0.81, 3.87)
Size of center 0.885 <0.001 <0.001 0.017
 <20 patients Ref Ref Ref Ref
 20–50 patients 1.17 (0.71,1.93) 2.54 (1.42, 4.55) 1.95 (1.50, 2.53) 1.03 (0.52, 2.03)
 51–100 patients 0.95 (0.63,1.43) 1.46 (0.93, 2.29) 1.51 (1.05, 2.18) 2.18 (0.93, 5.12)
 >100 patients 0.99 (0.68, 1.42) 2.44 (1.57, 3.78) 1.56 (1.06, 2.30) 2.03 (1.04, 3.96)
Income status n/a 0.024 0.003 0.119
 High-income Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Upper middle-income 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) 1.20 (0.50, 2.89) 2.14 (1.34, 3.41) 1.58 (0.75, 3.33)
 Lower middle-income -- 5.57 (1.64, 18.9) 1.95 (0.81, 4.79) 4.01 (0.93, 17.2)
Participant characteristics Abdominal strengthening exercises can be safely performed by peritoneal dialysis patients
OR (95% CI)
P-value The majority of peritoneal dialysis patients are physically active
OR (95% CI)
P-value The majority of peritoneal dialysis patients could perform more exercise
OR (95% CI)
P-value The majority of patients would benefit from an exercise professional in my peritoneal dialysis program
OR (95% CI)
P-value
Gender 0.473 0.847 0.718 0.027
 Female Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Male 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) 1.02 (0.80, 1.31) 1.07 (0.74, 1.55) 0.60 (0.39, 0.94)
Occupation <0.001 0.021 0.002 0.188
 Nephrologist Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Dietician 0.32 (0.18, 0.56) 0.34 (0.13, 0.90) 0.67 (0.42, 1.08) 1.07 (0.45, 2.57)
 Exercise professional 1.44 (0.69, 3.02) 0.96 (0.38, 2.42) 2.51 (0.49, 13.0) 1.29 (0.47, 3.59)
 Nurse 0.57 (0.40, 0.83) 0.88 (0.60, 1.30) 0.70 (0.49, 1.01) 0.77 (0.49, 1.20)
 Social worker 0.32 (0.13, 0.79) 1.60 (1.11, 2.31) 1.32 (0.73, 2.38) 1.68 (0.87, 3.23)
 Other 0.50 (0.20, 1.27) 0.59 (0.21, 1.64) 0.83 (0.28, 2.47) 1.06 (0.26, 4.30)
Work experience 0.742 0.162 0.828 0.102
 <2 years Ref Ref Ref Ref
 2 to 5 years 1.24 (0.71, 2.15) 0.78 (0.40, 1.53) 0.87 (0.52, 1.45) 1.37 (0.90, 2.08)
 >5 years 1.19 (0.73, 1.96) 1.01 (0.50, 2.03) 0.94 (0.54, 1.62) 0.96 (0.53, 1.71)
Size of center 0.609 0.908 0.079 0.861
 <20 patients Ref Ref Ref Ref
 20−50 patients 1.10 (0.76, 1.60) 0.88 (0.60, 1.29) 1.62 (1.04, 2.52) 0.89 (0.57, 1.38)
 51−100 patients 1.12 (0.74, 1.71) 0.90 (0.61, 1.33) 1.65 (1.06, 2.58) 1.09 (0.67, 1.79)
 >100 patients 1.22 (0.90, 1.65) 0.87 (0.58, 1.31) 1.81 (1.04, 3.15) 0.91 (0.52, 1.60)
Income status 0.036 0.162 0.313 0.05
 High-income Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Upper middle-income 2.07 (1.19, 3.59) 0.80 (0.39, 1.63) 0.82 (0.42, 1.59) 1.08 (0.65, 1.80)
 Lower middle-income 1.12 (0.63, 1.98) 2.12 (0.85, 5.27) 0.59 (0.30, 1.16) 2.22 (1.15, 4.28)

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ref, x.