Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 23;5(14):3671–3683. doi: 10.1039/d3na00211j

Comparison of different photocatalysts reported for H2 production.

S. no. Photocatalyst Sacrificial agent Light source H2 production rate Ref.
1 TiO2/CuO Methanol Xe lamp 8.23 mmol h−1 g−1 37
2 AC–TiO2 Glycerol Solar light 20 383 μmol g−1 h−1 38
3 TiO2/ACS Glycerine Solar light 203 μmol g−1 h−1 39
4 PtCu–TiO2 Methanol LED irradiation 2383.9 μmol h−1 40
5 Pd–TiO2 Ethanol Near-UV light 113 cm3 STP 16
6 Pd–TiO2 Ethanol Visible light 29 cm3 STP 16
7 Ni/GO–TiO2 Methanol UV light 2171 μmol h−1 g−1 41
8 CuO/TiO2NT Methanol Mercury lamp 64.2–71.6 mmol h−1 g−1 42
9 SnS2/TiO2 Methanol Solar irradiation 195.55 μmol g−1 21
10 Pt–TiO2 Methanol UV mercury lamp 38.0 mmol g−1 h−1 43
11 TiO2NTs–AC Methanol Solar light 18 000 μmol−1 g−1 h−1 Present work