Comparison of different photocatalysts reported for H2 production.
| S. no. | Photocatalyst | Sacrificial agent | Light source | H2 production rate | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TiO2/CuO | Methanol | Xe lamp | 8.23 mmol h−1 g−1 | 37 |
| 2 | AC–TiO2 | Glycerol | Solar light | 20 383 μmol g−1 h−1 | 38 |
| 3 | TiO2/ACS | Glycerine | Solar light | 203 μmol g−1 h−1 | 39 |
| 4 | PtCu–TiO2 | Methanol | LED irradiation | 2383.9 μmol h−1 | 40 |
| 5 | Pd–TiO2 | Ethanol | Near-UV light | 113 cm3 STP | 16 |
| 6 | Pd–TiO2 | Ethanol | Visible light | 29 cm3 STP | 16 |
| 7 | Ni/GO–TiO2 | Methanol | UV light | 2171 μmol h−1 g−1 | 41 |
| 8 | CuO/TiO2NT | Methanol | Mercury lamp | 64.2–71.6 mmol h−1 g−1 | 42 |
| 9 | SnS2/TiO2 | Methanol | Solar irradiation | 195.55 μmol g−1 | 21 |
| 10 | Pt–TiO2 | Methanol | UV mercury lamp | 38.0 mmol g−1 h−1 | 43 |
| 11 | TiO2NTs–AC | Methanol | Solar light | 18 000 μmol−1 g−1 h−1 | Present work |