Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 21;46(7):zsad119. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad119

Table 2.

2 × 2 ANOVA with interaction analysis between the HIIT and sleep conditions on memory performance

Variables Source SS df MS F P ηp2
Immediate retrieval dʹ HIIT/no-HIIT 0.036 1 0.036 0.015 0.903 0.001
Average/restricted sleep 1.430 1 1.430 0.602 0.440 0.007
Interaction 7.760 1 7.760 3.267 0.074 0.036
Error 209.028 88 2.375
Total 218.390 92
Delayed retrieval dʹ HIIT/no-HIIT 1.193 1 1.193 0.532 0.468 0.006
Average/restricted sleep 3.294 1 3.294 1.468 0.229 0.016
Interaction 6.745 1 6.745 3.006 0.050* 0.033
Error 197.459 88 2.244
Total 208.770 92
Difference in dʹ (delayed – immediate retrieval) HIIT/no-HIIT 2.814 1 2.814 1.631 0.205 0.018
Average/restricted sleep 1.784 1 1.784 1.035 0.312 0.012
Interaction 0.223 1 0.223 0.129 0.720 0.001
Error 151.773 88 1.725
Total 156.665 92

N = 92; *p ≤ 0.05.

Groups: S8: average sleep opportunity (n = 23); S5: sleep restriction (n = 24); HIITS8: HIIT plus average sleep opportunity (n = 21); HIITS5: HIIT plus sleep restriction (n = 24).

dʹ: discriminability index ηp2: partial eta-squared; SS: Type III sum of squares; df: degree of freedom; MS: mean square.