Table 4.

Summary of hierarchical regression models explaining ED severity and ED related psychological symptoms by parental RF with and without daughters' RF

Predictors	EAT-26		IC		IPC		APC		OC
	β	R2change	β	R2change	β	R2change	β	R2change	β	R2change
Step 1		10*		.17*		.17*		.18*		.06
M-RF	− .18		− .25†		− .14		− .29*		.02
P-RF	− .17		− .16		− .31*		− .19		− .26†
Step 2		10*		.11*		.09*		.02		.00
M-RF	− .08		− .14		− .05		− .25		.04
P-RF	− .05		− .09		− .20		− .15		− .25
D-RF	− .37**		− .39*		− .34*		− .15		− .05
ΔR2		.15*		.24***		.22**		.16*		.02

D-RF daughters' Reflective-Functioning, M-RF maternal Reflective-Functioning, P-RF paternal Reflective-Functioning, EAT-26 Eating Attitude Test 26, EDI-3 Eating Disorder Inventory 3, IC Ineffectiveness Composite, IPC Interpersonal Problems Composite, APC Affective Problems Composite, OC Overcontrol Composite

^†p = .08; *p < .05; **p < .001

^aR² in step 1, ^bR² in step 2