Table 3.
Comparison of exercise NRS pain scores between the two groups
| PENG group, n = 29 | FICB group, n = 28 |
F
intergroup,
P |
F
time,
P |
F
Interaction,
P |
PENG group vs.FICB group median difference (95% CI), P |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 7 (6, 8) | 7 (6, 8) |
16.931, < 0.001 |
322.145, < 0.001 |
3.930, 0.002 |
0 (-1 to 0), 0.870 |
| T1 | 2 (1, 3) ab | 3 (2, 4) a | -1 (-1 to 0), 0.003 | |||
| T2 | 2 (2, 3) ab | 3 (3, 4) a | -1 (-2 to -1), < 0.001 | |||
| T3 | 3 (3, 4) ab | 4 (3, 5) a | -1 (-1 to 0), 0.001 | |||
| T4 | 3 (2, 3) ab | 4 (3, 4) a | -1 (-1 to -1), < 0.001 | |||
| T5 | 2 (2, 3) ab | 3 (3, 4) a | -1 (-1 to 0), < 0.001 |
Data are presented as median (IQR). Multiple time points were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. Comparison between the groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Fintergroup: F-value of the test statistic for inter-group comparison between groups; Ftime: F-value of the test statistic for multiple time points comparison between groups; FInteraction: F-value of the test statistic for interaction comparison between groups. a Denotes statistical significance compared to the T0 within the group. b Denotes statistical significance between the groups. PENG group: continuous pericapsular nerve group block; FICB group: continuous fascia iliac compartment block. NRS: numerical rating scale.CI: interquartile range