Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;46(7):zsad053. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad053

Table 3.

Post-intervention feedback ratings at t1. P values are from Fisher’s exact tests comparing ratings between intervention arms

Feedback question (n, %) Study arm P value
Overall (n = 185) ST (n = 90) NW (n = 95)
Was the Unmind app and intervention easy to use? 0.6
 No 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Useable after a lot of time and effort 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Useable after some time and effort 9 (4.9) 5 (5.6) 4 (4.3)
 Easy to learn 56 (30.4) 30 (33.3) 26 (27.7)
 Able to use app immediately 119 (64.7) 55 (61.1) 64 (68.1)
Would you recommend the intervention to people who might benefit from it? 0.8
 Not at all 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Very few people 22 (12.0) 10 (11.1) 12 (12.8)
 Several people 67 (36.4) 36 (40.0) 31 (33.0)
 Many people 50 (27.2) 24 (26.7) 26 (27.7)
 Everyone 45 (24.5) 20 (22.2) 25 (26.6)
Do you agree that the intervention felt relevant to your personal situation and needs? 0.3
 Strongly agree 39 (21.2) 17 (18.9) 22 (23.4)
 Agree 102 (55.4) 47 (52.2) 55 (58.5)
 Neither 29 (15.8) 19 (21.1) 10 (10.6)
 Disagree 11 (6.0) 6 (6.7) 5 (5.3)
 Strongly disagree 3 (1.6) 1 (1.1) 2 (2.1)
Would you agree with the statement
“I experienced lasting bad effects from use of the intervention?”
0.8
 Strongly agree 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.1)
 Slightly agree 1 (0.5) 1 (1.1) 0 (0.0)
 Not sure 9 (4.9) 4 (4.4) 5 (5.3)
 Slightly disagree 10 (5.4) 6 (6.7) 4 (4.3)
 Strongly disagree 163 (88.6) 79 (87.8) 84 (89.4)
How satisfied are you with the intervention? 0.3
 Very satisfied 68 (37.0) 28 (31.1) 40 (42.6)
 Satisfied 83 (45.1) 43 (47.8) 40 (42.6)
 Neither 24 (13.0) 15 (16.7) 9 (9.6)
 Dissatisfied 9 (4.9) 4 (4.4) 5 (5.3)
How would you rate the quality of the intervention? 0.078
 Poor 1 (0.5) 1 (1.1) 0 (0.0)
 Okay 28 (15.2) 15 (16.7) 13 (13.8)
 Good 80 (43.5) 45 (50.0) 35 (37.2)
 Excellent 75 (40.8) 29 (32.2) 46 (48.9)