Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;14:71–78. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S419395

Table 2.

Comparison of Investigator-Assessed PFS Among Randomized Pivotal Trials of Brigatinib, Alectinib, and Lorlatinib

ALTA 1-L (Asian Subgroup) ALEX (Asian Subgroup) ALESIA (5 Year Follow-Up) CROWN (Asian Subgroup)*
Brigatinib Crizotinib Alectinib Crizotinib Alectinib Crizotinib Lorlatinib Crizotinib
N 59 49 69 69 125 62 59 61
Dose 180 mg QD 250 mg BID 600 mg BID 250 mg BID 600 mg BID 250 mg BID 100 mg QD 250 mg BID
Median Follow-up time (months) 40.7 (range: 0.7–49.9) 13.6 (range: 0.1–47.0) 27.8 (range: 0.5–38.7) 22.8 (range: 0.3–36.7) 61 51 36.7 (IQR: 31.3–41.9) 29.3 (IQR: 10.8–35.0)
mPFS (months) (95% CI) 26.7 (18.4 – not reached) 11.0 (9.2–18.6) 34.8 9.6 41.6 (33.1–58.9) 11.1 (9.1–18.4) NR (32.9 – NR) 9.2 (7.2–12.7)
HR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25–0.73; p = 0.0024) 0.43 (95% CI: 0.27–0.67) 0.33 (95% CI: 0.23–0.49) 0.24 (95% CI: 0.14–0.41)

Notes: *Asians from Japan, South Korea, Greater China (China, Hong Kong Taiwan), Singapore (N = 120). This analysis is different from the overall CROWN “Asian” subgroup analysis which included 131 “Asians” with a BIRC-assessed HR of 0.44 (0.26–0.75).

Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, inter-quartile range; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NR, not reached; QD, once daily.