Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;14:1238157. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238157

Table 2.

Alpha diversity metrics with their estimated marginal means and their 95% confidence interval for each treatment group.

Groups 1
CT WD DSS WD + DSS
Proximal
Chao1 533 (426–665)b 500 (399–625)ab 460 (360–588)ab 367 (296–462)a
Shannon 5.30 (5.0–5.66)b 5.20 (4.92–5.57)b 5.0 (4.63–5.30)ab 4.80 (4.05–5.09)a
Faith PD 35.4 (30.0–42.0)b 35.5 (30.0–42.0)b 29.4 (24.0–35.0)ab 27.4 (23.0–32.0)a
Distal
Chao1 535 (428–668)b 555 (443–695)b 397 (311–508)a 397 (315–501)a
Shannon 5.30 (4.94–5.59)b 5.30 (4.96–5.63)b 4.80 (4.46–5.12)a 4.90 (4.59–5.21)ab
Faith PD 36.4 (31.0–43.0)b 38.6 (32.0–46.0)b 26.9 (22.0–32.0)a 28.5 (24.0–34.0)a
Feces
Chao1 488 (387–615) 534 (426–668) 391 (301–506) 434 (347–542)
Shannon 5.20 (4.90–5.57) 5.30 (4.95–5.62) 5.0 (4.64–5.35) 5.0 (4.71–5.33)
Faith PD 34.3 (29–41)ab 37.9 (32–45)b 27.7 (23–34)a 30.6 (26–36)ab

1Treatment groups: control (CT; n = 17), WD (CT + ground beef; n = 18), CT + dextran sulfate sodium (DSS; n = 14), WD + dextran sulfate sodium (WD + DSS; n = 17). Pairwise comparison for differences in EMMS between groups was adjusted with BH and EMMs are superscripted with different letters at p < 0.05.