. 2023 Jul 11;13:11208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37624-w

Table 2.

Results.

	Effect	adj.R²	F	t	W	DF	Beta estimates	Std. error	p value
Rise time discrimination task
Group comparison without controlling	Group			3.43		41.82			0.001
Group comparison with controlling	Model performance	0.29	7.20			(3, 42)			< 0.001
	Group		13.45			1	− 0.53	0.25	< 0.001
	Hearing		4.82			1	0.009	0.007	0.033
	Cognition		3.31			1	− 0.02	0.01	0.075
Phonology ScreeLing (within-aphasia group)	Model performance	0.27	3.81			(3, 19)			0.052^b
	RTD task		11.37			1	− 2.70	0.87	0.006^b
	Hearing		0.08			1	0.01	0.04	0.778^b
	Cognition		0.005			1	0.004	0.06	0.942^b
Phonological word fluency (within-aphasia group)	Model performance	− 0.02	0.82			(3, 19)			0.498^b
	RTD task		0.86			1	− 2.18	1.58	0.362^b
	Hearing		0.95			1	0.04	0.08	0.682^b
	Cognition		0.64			1	− 0.08	0.11	0.864^b
Phoneme identification task
Group comparison without controlling^a	Group				81.5				0.006
Group comparison with controlling^a	Model performance	0.33
	Group		9.39			1	14.87	4.85	0.004
	Hearing		2.51			(2.67, 3.34)*			0.071
	Cognition		0.88			1	− 0.21	0.22	0.352
Phonology ScreeLing (within-aphasia group)	Model performance	0.35	4.07			(3, 14)			0.056^b
	Ph. id. task		2.54			1	− 0.08	0.04	0.265^b
	Hearing		7.68			1	− 0.06	0.05	0.030^b
	Cognition		1.99			1	0.06	0.04	0.36^b
Phonological word fluency (within-aphasia group)	Model performance	− 0.18	0.12			(3, 14)			0.944^b
	Ph. id. task		0.0002			1	0.04	0.13	0.989^b
	Hearing		0.31			1	0.10	0.18	0.583^b
	Cognition		0.05			1	0.03	0.14	0.811^b

adj.R²: adjusted R²; F: F-test value; t: t-test value; W: Wilcoxon test value; DF: degrees of freedom; Std. error: standard error; ^a: non-parametric tests applied; ^b: FDR-correction for multiple comparisons was applied (n = 2); *: effective DF and reference DF; significant effects are marked in bold.