Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;8:98. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00693-z

Table 2.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG binding antibody responses IgG serum antibody titers to vaccine (S-2P-WA-1 and Omicron B.1.1.529 strains) and reported as areas under the curve (AUC) via a 10-plex ECLIA assay.

Group 15 16 17

Primary EUA immunization

Vaccine

Janssen Moderna Pfizer/BioNTech
Ad26.COV2-S mRNA-1273 BNT162b2
5 × 1010 vp 100-mcg 30-mcg
Booster Novavax (NVX-CoV2373) 5-mcg plus 50-mcg Matrix M
Vaccine (S-2P-WA-1) Strain
Day 1 GMTa (95% CI)b 4123.0 18,310.7 14,083.8
(2352.67–7225.51) (11,647.69-28,785.21) (9270.68-21,395.63)
N = 20 N = 16 N = 31
Day 15 GMT (95% CI) 22,969.7 50,130.9 44,295.7
(15,905.3–33,171.7) (44,100.3–56,986.2) (39,894.3–49,182.7)
N = 19 N = 15 N = 29
Day 29 GMT (95% CI) 20,950.5 46,053.9 42,857.8
(13,923.5–31,524.0) (38,716.7–54,781.5) (38,031.1–48,297.0)
N = 18 N = 14 N = 29
Day 91 GMT (95% CI) 15,093.62 44,220.6 38,321.0
(9651.7–23,603.8) (35,889.0–54,486.3) (30,415.6–48,281.0)
N = 19 N = 13 N = 25
Percentage with twofold rise at Day 15 (95% CI) 84.2% 60.0% 62.1%
(60.4–96.6%) (32.3–83.7%) (42.3–79.3%)
Geometric mean fold rise at Day 15 (95% CI) 5.2 2.8 3.2
(3.3–8.3) (1.8–4.3) (2.2–4.8)
Omicron B.1.1.529
Day 1 GMT (95% CI) 535.5 3511.1 3269.6
(277.0–1035.0) (1750.2–7043.9) (1828.8–5845.6)
N = 20 N = 16 N = 31

Day 15 GMT (95% CI)

(n)

5968.6 21,524.8 16,656.8
(3459.4–10,297.6) (15,803.9–29,316.7) (13,114.4–21,156.1)
N = 19 N = 15 N = 29

Day 29 GMT (95% CI)

(n)

5164.3 17,202.8 15,484.3
(2788.6-9564.0) (1129.70–26,210.7) (11,969.5–20,031.4)
N = 18 N = 14 N = 29

Day 91 GMT (95% CI)

(n)

3184.4 14,911.9 13,089.4
(1790.0-5665.1) (8938.6–24,877.0) (8831.1–19,401.0)
N = 19 N = 13 N = 25
GM fold decrease relative to WA-1 at Day 15 (95% CI) 4.7 3.0 2.9
(3.8–5.9) (2.2–4.1) (2.4–3.5)
Day 15 geometric mean fold rise (95% CI) 11.8 6.0 5.4
(6.6–21.1) (3.1–11.4) (3.3–8.7)

Results are reported by primary immunization vaccine and timepoint relative to administration of the booster vaccine.

aGMT Geometric mean titers.

bCI Confidence intervals. The confidence intervals have not been adjusted for multiplicity, so the intervals should not be used to infer definitive treatment effects for secondary outcomes.