Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;14:4113. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39889-1

Fig. 1. Provenance issues of feature correspondence in LC-MS metabolomics data processing.

Fig. 1

a On a dataset of 184 repeated samples analyzed on an Orbitrap ID-X mass spectrometer (HZV029), XCMS generated 10,901 features and MZmine generated 42,099 features (see Supplementary Methods for versions and parameters). Between the two results, 6186 features are uniquely matched. Additional comparisons are reported in Supplementary Tables 1, 2. b Many mismatched features are due to failure to resolve reciprocal best match. This example shows all 3 features in XCMS match to all 5 features in MZmine. Retention time (rtime) is in seconds. c Illustration of mSelectivity as a function of how distinct a m/z value is, regarding to its neighboring features and mass resolution. Each dot represents a m/z feature, and its mSelectivity value (Y axis) depends on the horizontal distance to neighbor features. The error in matching m/z values is modeled as a Gaussian distribution dependent on mass resolution, and mSelectivity is low when a feature has neighbors with close m/z values. d Distribution of mSelectivity in the features produced by three processing tools. Feature m/z values are rounded to the 3rd decimal place, so that minor variations are ignored and split peaks are not taken into account. Rounding has no impact on asari, because asari m/z values are linked to mass tracks. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.