Literature study of CsPbBr3 absorber layer49.
Typea | Device structure | V OC (V) | J SC (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | Year | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | m-TiO2/CsPbBr3/carbon | 1.24 | 7.4 | 73.0 | 6.70 | 2016 | 33 |
1 | m-TiO2/CQD/CsPbBr3 IO/spiro/Ag | 1.06 | 11.34 | 69.0 | 8.29 | 2017 | 88 |
1 | FTO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/MoS2 QDs | 1.31 | 6.55 | 79.4 | 6.80 | 2018 | 89 |
1 | FTO/c-TiO2/m-TiO2/CsPbBr3/NiOx/C | 1.40 | 6.84 | 76.1 | 7.29 | 2018 | 90 |
1 | TiO2/CsPbBr3/CuPc/carbon | 1.26 | 6.62 | 74.0 | 6.21 | 2018 | 91 |
1 | m-TiO2/GQDs/CsPbBr3/CISZ-QDs/C | 1.52 | 7.35 | 84.0 | 9.43 | 2018 | 92 |
1 | m-TiO2/GQDs/CsPbBr3/C | 1.46 | 8.12 | 82.0 | 9.72 | 2018 | 93 |
1 | FTO/GQDs/CsPbBr3/PQDs/carbon | 5.08 | 1.21 | 66.7 | 4.10 | 2018 | 94 |
2 | FTO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/NiO/Au | 1.11 | 8.65 | 42.0 | 4.04 | 2019 | 95 |
1 | FTO/TiO2/I-CsPbBr3/carbon | 1.29 | 7.07 | 59.0 | 5.38 | 2019 | 96 |
1 | FTO/a-Nb2O5/CsPbBr3/CuPc/carbon | 1.45 | 5.64 | 70.0 | 5.74 | 2019 | 97 |
1 | FTO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/spiro-MeOTAD/Ag | 1.12 | 7.04 | 68.1 | 5.36 | 2019 | 98 |
1 | m-TiO2/CsPbBr3/PTAA/Au | 1.28 | 6.24 | 74.0 | 5.95 | 2020 | 99 |
1 | FTO/mp-TiO2/CsPbBr3 | 1.27 | 6.13 | 56.7 | 4.43 | 2020 | 100 |
1 | FTO/TiO2/CsPbBr3 + 3% l-lysine/carbon | 1.56 | 7.64 | 81.0 | 9.68 | 2020 | 101 |
1 | FTO/c-TiO2/Sn doped CsPbBr3/carbon | 1.36 | 9.27 | 71.0 | 8.95 | 2021 | 102 |
2 | FTO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/spiro-MeOTAD | 1.68 | 8.17 | 84.4 | 11.58 | 2020 | 103 |
2 | ITO/GO/CsPbBr3/PEDOT:PSS/Au | 1.57 | 8.50 | 77.4 | 10.34 | 2021 | 104 |
2 | ITO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/CFTS/Ni | 0.89 | 17.98 | 87.0 | 13.86 | 2023 | 49 |
2 | ITO/TiO2/CsPbBr3/CFTS/Ni | 0.87 | 27.57 | 85.9 | 20.73 | 2023 | b |
1 - experimental, 2 - theoretical.
This work.