Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2023 Jan 17;209(5):971–980. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003183

Table 2.

Stone and operative factors

Variable Participants (n = 424)
Side of treatment: right 180 (47%)
Mean size of dominant treated renal stone, mm 7.2 (3.8)
Mean size of dominant treated ureteral stone, mm 7.4 (3.1)
Dominant stone location*
 Renal 212 (50%)
 Proximal ureter 100 (24%)
 Distal ureter 103 (24%)
Median number of renal stones treated (quartiles) 3 (2, 4)
Operative time, min 57 (30)
Ureteroscopy time, min 40 (25)
Ureteroscope type*
 Flexible 266 (68%)
 Semirigid 57 (15%)
 Both 71 (18%)
Ureteral access sheath use 197 (47%)
Basket extraction 287 (68%)
No. of scope/basket passes
 1–4 145 (39%)
 5–20 152 (41%)
 >20 72 (20%)
Irrigation method
 Manual 188 (45%)
 Constant pressure 205 (49%)
Ureteral stent diameter
 4.7 French 47 (12%)
 6 French 349 (87%)
Ureteral stent length, cm
 22 11 (3%)
 24 127 (32%)
 26 159 (40%)
 28 90 (22%)
 30 13 (3%)
Proximal stent curl: complete 348 (82%)
Proximal stent curl location
 Renal pelvis 249 (63%)
 Calyx 145 (37%)
Stent dwell time, days 9 (8)
 Median (quartiles) 7 (5, 11)
*

Note: percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

Data shown are n (%) or mean (SD), except where indicated.