Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):3935–3944. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01708

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Compressive modulus vs density for different lightweight materials families and comparison with the studied lattices (SC, BCC, and FCC). (b) Relative compressive elastic modulus (i.e., the measured compressive elastic modulus of the lattice divided by the compressive elastic modulus of the constituent solid) of the studied 10 × 10 × 10 lattices as a function of the relative density and comparison with foams and honeycombs. The two trendlines approximate the different behavior of honeycomb and foams. Data related to the lattices studied in this paper refer to numerical simulations. Data for foams, honeycombs, and bone are taken from the CES Edu Pack database.