Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 23;24(7):2957–2981. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00098

Table 1. Comparison between Common Degumming Methods for SF.

degumming method reagents advantages drawbacks ref
alkaline degumming Na2CO3 strong and effective action possibility of fibroin damage (69,80)
NaHCO3 fast procedure decreasing fibers strength
Na2HPO4 more cost-effective β-sheet structure severely damaged
Na3PO4 lowering molecular weight time consuming
Na2[B4O5(OH)4]·8H2O a simple approach sericin degradation
acid degumming tartaric acid improvement in tensile strength slight decrease in dye uptake (69,81)
lactic acid
citric acid restricted hydrolysis
oxalic acid the degumming bath can be reused
malonic acid
succinic acid
trichloroacetic acid
dichloroacetic acid
monochloroacetic acid
glacial acetic acid
soap degumming marseille, sodium laurate, sodium myristate, sodium stearate whitening and brightening silk the degumming bath is not reusable (63,82)
excellent strength, elasticity effluent problems
avoids fiber coagulation metal ions in water can form insoluble metal soaps on silk
enzymatic degumming papain eliminates uneven dyeing simple enzyme deactivation (67,71)
trypsin
proteases enhances dye affinity (especially with reactive dyes) expensive
completely removes sericin risk of overreaction with fibers
environmentally friendly not suitable for large-scale commercial production
works at a moderate pH and temperature not efficient in removing hydrophobic impurities
amine degumming methylamine providing undamaged and uniform silk not easily applicable to industry (63,66)
ethylarnine fibers low degumming rate
diethylamine water does not affect degumming  
triethylamine whitening and brightening silk unpleasant odors
marseilles soap shorter processing times
lower temperature and less time required than soap degumming
carbon dioxide supercritical fluid degumming CO2 maintains the purity of sericin as well high costs and processing demand of high-tech equipment (70)
contamination-free
reduced amount of wastewater
low energy consumption
degumming by urea   high reproducibility undesirable degradation of SF (83)
SS produced by urea degumming has higher antityrosinase activity than SS produced by Na2CO3 degumming
high temperature and pressure (autoclaving)   highly efficient removing only the outer layer of sericin (68,71)
no contamination effects absorbency and whiteness
without contamination
cost-effective method
ultrasonication   environmentally friendly adding soap, alkali, acid, or enzyme is required (69,84)
improved energy efficiency
reduced chemical usage utilization of electrical energy for acoustic purposes
increasing productivity