Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(4):1563–1575. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230093

Table 3.

Associations between 2-year change in second-generation DNAm markers and 2-year change in secondary cognitive outcome scores (n = 45)

2-year change in DNAm marker 2-year change in secondary cognitive outcomes
General cognitive score (3MS) Verbal memoryd Executive function/attentione
β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p
DNAmPhenoAge,a in years −0.11 (−0.62 to 0.40) 0.65 −0.07 (−0.13 to −0.01) 0.03 0.03 (0.003 to 0.06) 0.03
DNAmGrimAge,b in years −0.57 (−1.46 to 0.32) 0.20 −0.08 (−0.20 to 0.04) 0.17 −0.06 (−0.11 to −0.01) 0.03
DNAmTL,c per 100-base pair 0.93 (−0.68 to 2.54) 0.25 0.21 (0.01 to 0.41) 0.04 0.07 (−0.03 to 0.17) 0.15

DNAm, DNA methylation; 3MS, the Modified Mini-Mental State; CI, confidence interval. Results of secondary cognitive outcomes were not adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing; findings should be interpreted with caution.

a

DNAmPhenoAge is a validated novel epigenetic clock that predicts varying aging outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cancers, healthspan, physical functioning, and Alzheimer’s disease [4].

b

DNAmGrimAge is a validated novel DNAm biomarker which predicts lifespan and all-cause mortality [5].

c

DNAmTL is a DNA methylation measurement of telomere length (unit is per 100-base pair) [6].

d

Verbal memory score is a composite score for the mean of the z-scores of 4 tests: the immediate and delayed recalls of both the TICS 10-word list and the East Boston Memory Test.

e

Executive function/attention score is a composite score for the mean of the z-scores of 4 tests: trails making tests A and B, and category fluency tests (naming animals and vegetables).