Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;14(2):194–200. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_45_23

Table 5.

Fusion outcomes based on the presence of bone fibers and carrier material

No fibers (n=54), n (%) Fibers present (n=169), n (%) P a
Bone bridging fusion
 Yes 45 (83.3) 152 (89.9) 0.283
 No 9 (16.7) 17 (10.1)
Screw fusion
 Yes 50 (92.6) 152 (89.9) 0.754
 No 4 (7.41) 17 (10.1)
Cobb fusion
 Yes 51 (94.4) 147 (87.0) 0.206
 No 3 (5.56) 22 (13.0)
Combined fusion
 Yes 41 (75.9) 126 (74.6) 0.983
 No 13 (24.1) 43 (25.4)

No carrier (n=94), n (%) Carrier present (n=129), n (%) P a

Bone bridging fusion
 Yes 85 (90.4) 112 (86.8) 0.537
 No 9 (9.57) 17 (13.2)
Screw fusion
 Yes 82 (87.2) 120 (93.0) 0.219
 No 12 (12.8) 9 (6.98)
Cobb fusion
 Yes 80 (85.1) 118 (91.5) 0.203
 No 14 (14.9) 11 (8.53)
Combined fusion
 Yes 67 (71.3) 100 (77.5) 0.365
 No 27 (28.7) 29 (22.5)

aBone fusion - radiopacity uniting the transverse processes on AP radiograph; screw fusion - lack of >2 mm of osteolysis surrounding at least two screws or visible instrumentation failure; cobb fusion - segmental lordosis difference of <5° between flexion and extension; combined fusion - if any of bone bridging, screw fusion, cobb fusion criteria were not met