Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;14(2):165–174. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_28_23

Table 6.

Comparison of clinical variables between navigated patients from the NSQIP dataset, fluoroscopy group, and “technique’n’technology” group utilizing the Airo CT navigation technology groups

NAV (n=326) Fluoro (n=136) TNT (n=152) P a P b P 3 P d
Age (years) 13.8 (11.1–16.5) 14.7 (13.3–15.9) 14.8 (13.4–16.3) <0.001 0.010 <0.001 0.450
Operative time (min) 323 (240–434) 304 (259–345) 247 (219–288) <0.001 0.050 <0.001 <0.001
LOS (days) 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 3 (2–4) <0.001 0.190 <0.001 <0.001
Transfusion, n (%) 236 (72.4) 30 (22.2) 41 (27.2) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.335
Complications, n (%) 22 (6.8) 7 (5.2) 4 (2.6) 0.180 0.67 0.070 0.558

aP-value for overall group difference; bP-value for Fluoro to NAV; 3P-value for TNT to NAV; 4P-value for Fluoro to TNT. Data are presented as median and IQRs or counts and percentages when applicable. Bold values indicate significance (P<0.05). Fluoro - Fluoroscopy group; TNT - “Technique’n’technology” group utilizing the Airo CT navigation technology; NAV - Navigated patients from the NSQIP dataset; LOS - Length of stay; IQRs: Interquartile ranges