Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;14(2):165–174. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_28_23

Table 7.

Comparison of radiographic and perioperative outcomes between fluoroscopy group and “technique’n’ technology” group utilizing the Airo CT navigation technology patients

Fluoro (n=136) TNT (n=152) P
Female, n (%) 105 (77.2) 109 (71.7) 0.290
Total radiation dose (mGy) 2.9 (1.9–4.3) 4.2 (1.6–12.9) 0.040
Total radiation time (s) 23.0 (15.4–33.0) 17.0 (9.4–22.6) 0.001
Preoperative major curve (°) 56.0 (50.0–63.5) 58.0 (54.3–63.9) 0.180
Postoperative major curve (°) 17.0 (12.2–22.9) 18.1 (12.7–24.8) 0.610
Cobb correction (%) 69.7 (59.9–78.7) 69.2 (59.4–80.1) 0.620
Preoperative kyphosis (°) 25.5 (17.0–36.2) 26.5 (15.6–37.5) 0.800
Postoperative kyphosis (°) 24.6 (18.0–31.0) 27.9 (18.1–37.6) 0.001
EBL (mL) 600 (400–700) 450 (300–700) <0.001

Data are presented as median and IQRs or counts and percentages when applicable. Bold values indicate significance (P<0.05). Fluoro - Fluoroscopy group; TNT - “Technique’n’ technology” group utilizing the Airo CT navigation technology; IQRs - Interquartile ranges; EBL - Estimate blood loss