Table 3.
The results of classification metrics obtained for the test dataset using deep transfer learning systems based on different architecture of pretrained convolutional neural networks and also proposed ensemble method
| Micro precision | Micro recall | Micro F1-score | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EfficientNetB0 | 84.74 | 84.61 | 84.16 | 85.92 |
| EfficientNetB1 | 68.75 | 71.17 | 69.34 | 74.29 |
| EfficientNetB2 | 87.19 | 86.66 | 86.76 | 88.5 |
| EfficientNetB3 | 86.06 | 85.64 | 85.67 | 86.84 |
| EfficientNetB4 | 88.11 | 88.51 | 88.27 | 89.42 |
| EfficientNetB5 | 73.52 | 73.1 | 72.73 | 77.43 |
| ResNet50 | 78.89 | 74.87 | 75.68 | 80.01 |
| NASNetLarge | 91.18 | 90.29 | 90.68 | 91.27 |
| NASNetMobile | 85.51 | 84.89 | 84.96 | 86.47 |
| DenseNet121 | 81.19 | 82.97 | 81.72 | 83.7 |
| Inception_resnet_v2 | 87.96 | 86.99 | 87.35 | 88.87 |
| InceptionV3 | 87.71 | 86.61 | 87.03 | 88.13 |
| Xception | 86.85 | 85.79 | 86.04 | 87.76 |
| ResNext50 | 83.58 | 82.17 | 82.41 | 85.36 |
| SeResnet50 | 85.84 | 87.67 | 86.61 | 87.58 |
| Proposed Ensemble model | 91.94 | 91.94 | 91.94 | 91.94 |