Table 2.
Facilitators | FPP statusa | |
Planning and engaging | ||
|
Reputable implementing institution and provision of high-quality resources | Provided |
|
Active leadership support (including recognition of staff input) and school ownership | Encouraged |
|
Counselors involved in decisions about FPP adoption and planning | Encouraged |
|
In-school champion that engages staff and students | Encouraged |
|
Engagement strategy for students and parents to encourage buy-in | Provided |
|
Supportive school implementation team with clear responsibilities to share load | Encouraged |
|
Dedicated staff time for planning and reviewing | Encouraged |
|
Established community support for referrals of high-risk students that are outside the remit or resources of schools |
Ideal |
Executing | ||
|
Flexible delivery of FPP | Provided |
|
Integration into school curriculum as an adjunct program | Ideal |
|
Technology support from implementing institution | Provided |
|
Adequate school-level resources (eg, rooms, Wi-Fi, and laptops) | Encouraged |
|
Standardized risk follow-up and referral processes for counselors | Encouraged |
|
Availability of counselors and provision of adequate time to respond to risk follow-ups | Encouraged |
|
In-school reminders about SPARXb completion for students | Encouraged |
aFPP status indicates whether the named facilitators were provided by the future proofing team, were encouraged by the future proofing team (and therefore adaptable based on school resourcing and preferences), or were outside of scope because of feasibility (and therefore ideal for future implementation).
bSPARX: Smart, Positive, Active, Realistic, X-factor thoughts.