Table 3.
Transgender health information resource user testing (T1 and T2) results of the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS).
| uMARS domain and subcategory | T1 (n=13), mean (SD) | T1 mean score assessmenta | T2 (n=13), mean (SD) | T2 mean score assessmenta | Mean score difference (T2 – T1) | ||||||
| Objective quality subscale scores | |||||||||||
|
|
Engagement | 3.80 (0.69) | Acceptable | 3.98 (0.69) | Acceptable | 0.18 | |||||
|
|
Functionality | 4.12 (0.19) | Good | 4.20 (0.11) | Good | 0.08 | |||||
|
|
Esthetics | 4.08 (0.20) | Good | 4.06 (0.14) | Good | −0.02 | |||||
|
|
Information | 4.50 (0.26) | Good | 4.75 (0.16) | Good-excellent | 0.25 | |||||
| Objective quality total mean scores | 4.13 (0.29) | Good | 4.25 (0.35) | Good | 0.12 | ||||||
| Subjective quality | 3.66 (0.75) | Acceptable | 3.75 (0.83) | Acceptable | 0.09 | ||||||
| Perceived impact | 4.31 (0.42) | Acceptable | 4.45 (0.40) | Good | 0.14 | ||||||
auMARS categories are assessed on a 5-point scale: 1=inadequate, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, and 5=excellent.