Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;25:e42641. doi: 10.2196/42641

Table 2.

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and generalized estimated equations (GEE) for self-efficacy and the secondary outcomes.

Outcome measure Range GEE (P value) ANCOVA-M0 ANCOVA-M6 P value



Sample, N Control, mean Intervention, mean Sample, N Control, mean Intervention, mean
Self-efficacy (GSEa)b 10-40 .98 198 27.62 28.69 42 29.64 29.45 .85
Anxiety (HADSc)d 0-21 .86 198 13.31 12.80 42 12.14 11.55 .60
Depression (HADS)e 0-21 .19 198 10.07 8.56 42 10.68 8.20 .29
Awareness (modified Contemplation Ladder) 0-10 .97 198 6.54 6.65 41 5.59 6.37 .87
Social support (MOS-SS5) 5-25 .13 198 15.88 15.82 38 14.89 17.58 .26
Fear of partner (VASf)d 0-10 .46 198 5.68 5.97 42 4.73 5.30 .71
Support by website (VAS)g 0-10 .88 N/A N/A N/A 42 4.09 5.00 .23

aGSE: General Self-Efficacy Scale.

bNo significant differences for the primary and secondary measures were found for M3 and M12. General population’s average on General Self-Efficacy Scale is 29, a higher score means a higher level of self-efficacy. No significant differences were found for self-efficacy in the complete case analysis either.

cHADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

dFor anxiety and fear of partner, we did find significant improvements over time for both groups, P=.006 and P=.02, respectively.

eA significant difference (P=.025) was found only between the study arms, not over time, from M0 on.

fVAS: Visual Analogue Scale.

gThis outcome was only measured in follow-up surveys, not at M0.