Table 2.
Comparison of the efficiency of routine on-site monitoring and hybrid monitoring model.
| Issue category per monitoring visit | Routine on-site monitoring, mean (SD) | Hybrid monitoring model, mean (SD) | P value |
| Number of patients | 9.10 (11.166) | 13.80 (19.967) | .004 |
| Time consumption (hours) | 11.63 (8.969) | 10.73 (8.883) | .13 |
| Number of AEa and concomitant medications | 43.51 (52.096) | 46.99 (55.718) | .45 |
| Time consumption for AE and concomitant medications (hours) | 7.23 (7.384) | 6.46 (6.436) | .56 |
| Number of CRFb pages | 145.48 (135.356) | 158.59 (151.562) | .66 |
| Time consumption for reviewing CRF pages (hours) | 10.27 (11.465) | 8.77 (6.484) | .91 |
| Total monitoring time (hours) | 28.61 (20.719) | 24.650 (20.950) | .03 |
| Total monitoring cost (CNY ¥; CNY ¥7.15=US $1) | 408.80 (688.131) | 220.06 (337.367) | <.001 |
aAE: adverse events.
bCRF: case report form.